No. Being a 'wicked woman' in a novel often means she is the antagonist. And antagonists usually end up with a bad fate, like losing everything in the end. So it's not better.
Yes, in a sense it can be. In certain novels, a 'wicked woman' character often has more interesting storylines. She is not confined by the usual moral constraints. She can be more adventurous, like in some historical novels where a 'wicked' female character might scheme her way into power, which is much more exciting than a typical submissive female role.
It depends on your perspective. Some might think it's better as it offers more freedom and power, while others might disagree due to moral or ethical reasons.
In a novel, being a wicked woman can be more interesting in terms of the story. She can be the catalyst for a lot of drama and conflict. However, if we look at it from a character - growth perspective, it's not necessarily better. A 'good' character might have a more profound transformation journey, while a wicked woman may just continue in her ways. So, it's not straightforwardly better.
Well, it's a matter of personal taste. Some people find the complexity and unconventional nature of a wicked woman's character more interesting and engaging. However, others might prefer more positive and virtuous representations.
It depends on your taste. Some people love it for its unique world-building and complex themes. But if you prefer straightforward stories, it might not be for you.
It's about a re - imagining of the land of Oz. It shows the Wicked Witch of the West in a different light, exploring her backstory, her motives, and how she became the so - called 'wicked' character we thought we knew from the classic Oz stories.