Well, it's a matter of personal taste. Some people find the complexity and unconventional nature of a wicked woman's character more interesting and engaging. However, others might prefer more positive and virtuous representations.
It depends on your perspective. Some might think it's better as it offers more freedom and power, while others might disagree due to moral or ethical reasons.
No. Being a 'wicked woman' in a novel often means she is the antagonist. And antagonists usually end up with a bad fate, like losing everything in the end. So it's not better.
Yes, in a sense it can be. In certain novels, a 'wicked woman' character often has more interesting storylines. She is not confined by the usual moral constraints. She can be more adventurous, like in some historical novels where a 'wicked' female character might scheme her way into power, which is much more exciting than a typical submissive female role.
In a novel, being a wicked woman can be more interesting in terms of the story. She can be the catalyst for a lot of drama and conflict. However, if we look at it from a character - growth perspective, it's not necessarily better. A 'good' character might have a more profound transformation journey, while a wicked woman may just continue in her ways. So, it's not straightforwardly better.
One possible theme could be the consequences of evil deeds. Since it's about a wicked woman, the story might show how her actions lead to negative outcomes for herself or others.
I haven't read the specific 'a wicked woman short story', so I can't summarize it directly. But generally, it might be about a woman who behaves in a malicious or unethical way, perhaps causing trouble for others, manipulating situations, or having bad intentions in her actions and relationships.