Well, it's a matter of personal taste. Some people find the complexity and unconventional nature of a wicked woman's character more interesting and engaging. However, others might prefer more positive and virtuous representations.
It depends on your perspective. Some might think it's better as it offers more freedom and power, while others might disagree due to moral or ethical reasons.
No. Being a 'wicked woman' in a novel often means she is the antagonist. And antagonists usually end up with a bad fate, like losing everything in the end. So it's not better.
Well, it could be better for some. A wicked woman in a novel often brings more drama. She can create complex plots by her devious actions, which makes the story more exciting.
Sure. In a novel, a wicked woman can be a more alluring character. Her actions that go against the grain can be fascinating to read about. She can be a symbol of resistance against a repressive society or a catalyst for change within the story world. For instance, in some feminist novels, the 'wicked' woman might be fighting against patriarchal norms in her own unorthodox way.
Well, one characteristic is her audacity. She has the nerve to do things that others might shy away from. She might be involved in schemes and plots that are morally wrong but fascinating from a storytelling perspective. Another aspect is her allure. Often, she has a certain charm that draws people in, even as they know she's up to no good. This charm can be physical or in her personality, like her confidence and boldness. And she can be very resourceful, using whatever means she has at her disposal, be it her beauty, intelligence or social connections, to further her own ends.
Well, whether it's good or not really varies. It might have an engaging plot, well-developed characters, and nice art that make it good for some. But for others, maybe the genre or style doesn't appeal to them.