One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
The NY Times Mexico immigration story likely covers various aspects such as the reasons for immigration from Mexico. It could be due to economic factors, like seeking better job opportunities in the United States. Maybe there are also issues related to family reunification. Another aspect could be the challenges immigrants face during the journey, including border crossings and dealing with immigration policies.
Another might be 'Where the Crawdads Sing' by Delia Owens. This book is set in the marshlands. It has a mystery element as the main character, Kya, is suspected of murder. It also beautifully portrays nature and a girl's journey of survival and love.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
I don't have enough information to know who specifically wrote the 'ny times fat story'. There are many journalists at the New York Times, and it could be written by anyone who was assigned to cover the topic related to fat.
I'm not sure specifically what the 'ny times fat story' is without more context. It could be about various aspects related to the topic of fat, such as health issues associated with excess body fat, cultural views on fat, or perhaps a story about a particular person's experience with being overweight or dealing with fat - related matters.
I'm not sure specifically which 'ny times trump story' you're referring to. The New York Times has covered many stories related to Trump. It could be about his political campaigns, his policies, or various events during his time in office.
Some of the books on the list might include 'The Underground Railroad' by Colson Whitehead. It's a powerful novel that uses a fictionalized version of the Underground Railroad as a framework to explore themes of slavery, race, and freedom in America.
No, the New York Times has not retracted the Sicknick story. The reporting on Sicknick was part of a broader narrative about events that took place. While there may be different viewpoints and some争议 around the details, the NY Times has stood by its reporting. There have been no official statements or actions from the newspaper to suggest that they are taking back what they initially reported regarding Sicknick.