I'd say Jurassic Park leans more towards hard science fiction. It incorporates a lot of real scientific concepts and theories related to genetics and paleontology.
In the 'Jurassic Park' novel, it represents hard science fiction through its detailed exploration of cloning. The idea of bringing dinosaurs back to life using DNA from ancient sources is firmly rooted in scientific concepts, though fictionalized. It shows how science could potentially manipulate genetics in extreme ways, with all the consequences that come with it.
The scientific concepts in 'Jurassic Park' are what make it notable in hard science fiction. The cloning idea was quite revolutionary at the time of writing. It made readers think about the possibilities and ethical implications of such scientific feats.
Sure is. Jurassic Park falls under the science fiction genre because it explores scientific ideas and possibilities, like genetic engineering and the recreation of extinct species, in a fictional setting.
Jurassic Park is science fiction because it involves concepts like genetic engineering and cloning to bring dinosaurs back to life, which are based on scientific theories and imagination.
I think Jurassic Park is more science fiction. It introduced the revolutionary idea of bringing dinosaurs back to life, which was a huge sci-fi concept at the time. Jurassic World expanded on that but didn't introduce as radical new ideas.
The reason Jurassic Park is science fiction is that it imagines a future where science has unlocked the ability to bring back dinosaurs. It involves complex scientific theories and cutting-edge technology that don't exist in our current reality.
Jurassic World and Jurassic Park have some similarities and differences. Both feature dinosaurs and a theme of humans interacting with them. But Jurassic World has more advanced technology and larger-scale park operations.