I don't think so. Throughout the story, we only know her as Mrs Shears. There's no indication of her full name at all. We can only guess what her first name might be, but the author didn't provide it in the story.
I'm quite sure it wasn't. Mrs. Shears is always called just that in the story. It's possible that the focus of the story was on other aspects such as the actions, relationships, or emotions of the characters rather than on providing every character's full name. Maybe the lack of her full name is a narrative choice to keep the story flowing and not get bogged down in too much detail about a character who may not be the central focus but still an important part of the plot.
No. When we read the story, we get to know her as Mrs Shears. There's no part of the story where her full name is brought up. It could be that the author wanted to keep her identity somewhat veiled or simply that her full name was not relevant to the story's main events. Maybe the story is more about the relationships and events that surround her without the need for a full name.
Well, in the phrase 'Becca and Wyatt tell my story', Becca and Wyatt are likely characters or real people. It's possible they are storytellers. Maybe they are part of a project where they are tasked with narrating someone's experiences, could be for a documentary, a book, or even a personal blog. Without further information, it's hard to say more about them.
The story of Aubrey Wyatt could involve overcoming challenges, achieving dreams, or experiencing unexpected turns of fate. It all depends on the details and the author's imagination.
The story of Wyatt Earp has elements of truth, but it's also been romanticized over time. Some of the key events and characters are real, but the details might have been embellished in the retelling.