Under normal circumstances, programmers couldn't directly search or obtain other people's privacy. This was to protect privacy and security. Take the password-related operations in programming as an example. Passwords were mostly stored in encrypted form. When the programmer verified the password and other operations, he could not directly check the password plaintexts. Instead, he could perform related operations through encryption comparison and other methods. On Zhihu's platform, there were protective measures for user privacy rights, and it adhered to a " zero tolerance " attitude to govern online copyright violation content, including the handling of privacy violation reports. This also meant that Zhihu would not allow programmers to check user privacy at will. However, if there was illegal hacking, it would be a different story. However, such behavior violated laws, regulations, and ethics. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
The programmer could not check other people's privacy. Under normal circumstances, everyone's personal information was considered private and could not be casually checked. Even programmers were more familiar with computer programs than ordinary people, but they were not omnipotent. If a programmer wanted to investigate someone else's personal information, they could only use hacking to steal the other party's personal website to obtain information. However, this kind of behavior was morally and legally unacceptable. In our country, only the personnel of state agencies can access other people's personal information under certain circumstances (such as when someone makes a mistake), or they can bring a valid ID to check their own information. Usually, other people's personal information cannot be viewed privately. Therefore, in Zhihu or other situations, the programmers could not check their privacy either. "When a programmer meets a psychologist" is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
Just from the information provided, it was impossible to determine whether the programmer could see the privacy. If a programmer was involved in developing an application or system that involved private data and did not follow strict privacy protection rules, then there was a possibility of seeing privacy. However, if the development process followed privacy protection related regulations, ethics, and technical means to ensure data security and privacy protection, then under normal circumstances, privacy should not be seen. For example, it was mentioned in document 6 that the programmer found a loophole in the link to the physical examination report and could view other people's reports. This was a special case. Under normal circumstances, they should not be allowed to view other people's private data. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
It might involve looking into how personal information is handled or protected within the manhwa's storylines.
Under normal circumstances, programmers could not casually check other people's WeChat records. The chat history of WeChat was a user's private content and was strictly protected. However, there were some illegal methods that claimed to be able to recover or view WeChat chat records, such as some technicians who claimed to be professional in cracking WeChat passwords and recovering chat records (this was a violation of laws, regulations, and ethics). At the same time, users could try to restore their accidentally deleted chat records through the repair tools that came with WeChat (such as finding the settings in WeChat, clicking on Help and feedback, then clicking on the repair tools in the upper right corner, selecting the chat record option in the fault repair, etc.). This was within the scope of the user's own authority, which was fundamentally different from the programmer illegally checking other people's records. "When a programmer meets a psychologist" is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
If it was to check whether the ID number entered by the user was legal, the programmer could write a program to check it. For example, using regular expressions, it might only take five minutes to complete the design of the ID number checking program. However, this was only to check the validity of the number, not to conduct a comprehensive inquiry on the information related to the ID card. In actual application scenarios, inquiries related to ID cards needed to follow laws and regulations as well as relevant authority regulations. Generally, one could not casually inquire about ID card information. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
From a technical and legal perspective, programmers generally couldn't easily find WeChat records. First of all, WeChat's information was encrypted. Even if the programmer intercepted the data stream, the possibility of cracking the information contained was very small. Moreover, privately checking other people's WeChat records was an invasion of privacy. Although in theory, the WeChat back-end staff could see the chat history, they would not casually check the user's chat history. If it was a hacker or other malicious programmer, although they might have the technical means to try to steal WeChat records, this kind of behavior was illegal and immoral. Moreover, WeChat itself was constantly strengthening security measures to protect user privacy and prevent such illegal access to information. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
If the programmer used legal and compliant methods, such as using the help and feedback in the WeChat settings under the user's own operation, clicking on the repair tool in the upper right corner, selecting the chat record recovery in the fault repair, or connecting the phone and computer to the same Wi-Fi and then performing backup and recovery of chat records on the computer, it could perform a certain degree of chat record recovery and other operations, but this was also within the scope of the user's own authority. However, if the programmer tried to obtain WeChat friend records through unofficial or illegal means (such as privately cracking, using an unauthorized interface, etc.), it was a violation of privacy policies, laws and regulations, and WeChat terms of use. It was not allowed. "When a programmer meets a psychologist" is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
Without legal authorization and legitimate business needs, programmers couldn't find other people's information. Modern society placed great emphasis on privacy protection, and personal information was protected by strict laws and regulations. In an enterprise or organization, access to other people's information was usually subject to strict permission control. For example, in the database system, there was a role-based access control mechanism. If the programmer was not granted specific permission, he could not query other people's information. Even in the process of software development and data management, programmers must follow relevant privacy policies, security regulations, and ethical guidelines. They must not invade the privacy of others at will. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
There were cases where programmers monitored other people's phones. Some programmers might use technology to monitor other people's phones, but this kind of behavior without the consent of others was immoral and could be illegal. For example, by inducing the other party to click on a link sent by a text message, social software, or a fake APP, a trojans program could be implanted to monitor the phone. However, under normal circumstances, most programmers would not do such illegal things. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!
From a technical point of view, it was possible for programmers to hack into other people's phones. Hackers often hid their tracks and used complex techniques to cover up their attacks, and many of the hackers were programmers with advanced computer skills. They could use malicious software or network attacks to obtain calls, text messages, social media, and other information on the phone to monitor it. For example, they might use loopholes or malicious code in game software to invade and control mobile phones because game software is usually connected to the Internet and may have security loopholes. They could also set up fake hot spots on public Wi-Fi, let the victims connect, and then obtain information through network sniffing tools. However, hacking into other people's phones was immoral and usually illegal. " When a programmer meets a psychologist " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click to read it!