How to fill in the feedback form of the technical training meeting

Answer 1

The following is an example of a technical training meeting feedback form:

** 1. Basic Information **
1. ** Training topic **: Enter the topic of the technical training conference, such as "Information Technology Ability Enhancement Project 2.0 Training".
2. ** Instructor **: Write the name of the instructor.
3. ** Training time **: specify the specific date and time of the training, for example,"October 1-October 3, 2024, 9:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m.".
4. ** Trainee **: Enter the name of the employee participating in the training.
5. ** Trained Department **: Write the name of the department the employee belongs to.

** II. Training Evaluation **

**(I) Training Organization **
1. ** Prompt and accurate early notice **
- Excellent: If the notice is sent out in advance and contains all the key information of the training (such as time, location, training content, requirements, etc.), it can be rated as excellent.
- Good: The notice is basically on time and contains the main information, but some details may be missing or unclear.
- Medium: Notification delayed or missing important information.
- Poor: Notification is very late or critical information is missing.
2. ** The training was carried out in an orderly manner **
- Excellent: The training process was smooth, and the transition between each segment (opening, explanation, interaction, rest, ending, etc.) was natural. There was no confusion or long waiting.
- Good: The overall process is relatively smooth, but there may be slight delays or loose connections in one or two small links.
- Medium: There are some minor problems in the process, such as a short interruption caused by equipment testing, a chaotic link conversion, etc.
- "Poor: Disorder often occurs during the training process, which seriously affects the training progress."
3. ** Fully prepared (equipment, information)**
- Excellent: The equipment will operate without fault during the training period. The information is complete, accurate, and closely related to the training content. Each person has a copy or is easily accessible.
- Good: The equipment is basically normal, but there may be small faults that will be resolved quickly. The information is relatively complete, but there may be a small amount of inaccurate content.
- Medium: Some equipment malfunction affects the training, and some information is missing or not relevant to the training content.
- Poor: frequent equipment malfunction, severely insufficient information or does not match the training content.

**(2) Training courses **
1. ** Form suitable for learning needs **
- Excellent: The training format (such as lectures, case studies, practical exercises, group discussions, etc.) is very suitable for the training content and the learning habits of the students, which can promote the absorption of knowledge.
- Good: The format is suitable, but there may be some parts that can be optimized to better meet the needs.
- Medium: The form can basically meet the requirements, but there are some unreasonable aspects, such as too much theoretical explanation and too little practical operation.
- [Poor: The format is completely unsuitable for learning, seriously affecting the learning effect.]
2. ** The content is reasonable and helpful **
- Excellent: The content structure is clear, from simple to deep, with prominent key points, which is of great help to practical work or learning.
- Good: The content arrangement is reasonable. Most of the content is helpful, but there may be a small part that is redundant or not in-depth enough.
- Medium: The content structure is a bit messy. Some of the content is not related to the main topic. It will be of some help to me but limited.
- Poor: The content arrangement is unreasonable, out of touch with the training objectives, and hardly helpful to oneself.
3. ** Training time is controlled reasonably **
- Excellent: The training schedule is just right. It won't be too tight and cause too much pressure to study, nor will it be too long and cause fatigue.
- Good: The time is basically reasonable, but there may be some parts (such as break time or the length of a certain segment) that can be adjusted.
- Medium: The time arrangement is somewhat unreasonable. For example, a certain knowledge point is explained too long or the overall training time is too long or too short.
- Poor: The time control is very bad, seriously affecting the training effect.

**(3) Instructor training **
1. ** Teaching attitude (energetic and enthusiastic)**
- Excellent: The instructor is energetic and actively involved in the training process, and can infect the students with enthusiasm.
- Good: The lecturer is more enthusiastic, but there may be occasional situations where he is not focused.
- Medium: The lecturer's attitude is relatively flat and lacks enough enthusiasm to motivate the students.
- Poor: The lecturer's attitude is negative and does not show the necessary enthusiasm for teaching.
2. ** Lecturing Skills (Vivid and infectious)**
- Excellent: The lecturer can use a variety of teaching methods (such as stories, examples, interactions, etc.) to make the class lively and interesting, and easily attract the attention of the students.
- Good: The lecture is more lively, but it may be a little monotonous in some parts.
- Medium: The lecture method is relatively ordinary and lacks appeal.
- Poor: The lecture method is very boring, making it difficult for the students to concentrate.
3. ** Rich in knowledge, organized and logical **
- Excellent: The lecturer is very proficient in the relevant knowledge of the training content. The explanation is logical, clear and easy to understand.
- Good: The lecturer is knowledgeable and organized, but may be slightly lacking in logic on some complex knowledge points.
- Medium: The lecturer has a certain amount of knowledge, but the explanation is not very clear and the logic is a little chaotic.
- "Poor: The lecturer's knowledge reserves are insufficient, and the explanation lacks logic and order."
4. ** Control and interaction of classroom atmosphere **
- Excellent: The lecturer is able to mobilize the classroom atmosphere well, the arrangement of the interaction is reasonable, and the student participation is high.
- Good: The atmosphere in the classroom is good, and there is an interaction segment, but the depth or breadth of the interaction can be further improved.
- Medium: The classroom atmosphere is dull, and there is little interaction or poor interaction.
- Poor: There was almost no interaction, and the classroom atmosphere was dead silent.

**(4) Training summary **
1. ** Satisfied with this training **
- [Very Satisfied: If you perform well in the training organization, courses, instructors, and other aspects, and you have gained a lot from the training, you can choose Very Satisfied.]
- [Satisfied: Overall good. Although there are some minor shortcomings, it does not affect the overall training effect.]
- Average: There are some obvious problems, but there are also some gains.
- Dissatisfied: The training had serious problems in many aspects and did not achieve the expected learning effect.

** 3. Gains from this course (Multiple choices available)**
1. ** Acquired practical knowledge **: This option can be selected if you have acquired knowledge that is directly related to work or study and can be applied immediately, such as new technical operation processes, theoretical knowledge, etc.
2. ** Good communication with colleagues **: If there are more opportunities to interact with colleagues, exchange experiences, share opinions, etc. during the training process, choose this option.
3. [Obtained operational work skills: Learn specific skills that can be implemented in actual work, such as operating skills of certain software.]
4. ** Changed one's work attitude **: If the training content or the instructor's guidance has caused a positive change in one's work attitude, such as being more proactive and paying attention to details.
5. [I got some new ideas and concepts, I came into contact with new ideas and ways of thinking, and broadened my horizons.]
6. ** Help with daily work **: The training content has a direct or indirect positive impact on daily work, whether it is to improve efficiency, improve quality, or solve problems.

** 4. What are the shortcomings of this training? Did you learn anything you want to learn? **
1. ** Training deficiency **:
- If there were problems with the training organization, they could point out specific situations such as delayed notifications, chaotic processes, and equipment failures.
- In terms of course content, the content was too simple or complicated, lacked practicality, and was out of touch with practical work.
- As for lecturers, for example, their teaching attitude was not positive, their lectures were boring, and their knowledge reserves were insufficient.
2. ** Learn what you want to learn **:
- If the expected knowledge and skills were completely learned, it could be indicated as yes. If the expected knowledge and skills were partially learned or not learned at all, the corresponding situation could be explained, such as which content was not covered, or although it was covered, the explanation was not deep enough, etc.
Read more exciting novels for free