If the king wants the minister to die, the minister must die.
A similar sentence was," From my ancestors to my descendants, I have accumulated credit for the three generations of Qin. Now I have more than 300,000 troops. Although I am imprisoned, my power is enough to betray the court. However, those who know that they will die and stick to righteousness dare not insult the teachings of their ancestors, so as not to forget the first lord."" The monarch sends me with courtesy, and I serve the monarch with loyalty."" The river does not wash away the hatred of ancient and modern times, and heaven and earth can know the loyalty of the heart."" The wind knows the strength of the grass, and the swing knows the sincerity of the minister." To a certain extent, these sentences reflected the relationship between the monarch and his subjects or the concept of loyalty in ancient feudal ethics. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
The king wants the minister to die, the minister has to die
" If the ruler wants the subject to die, the subject must die " was not from the Confucian classics. Confucius did not express this statement. It came from the "Pipa Story" at the end of the Yuan Dynasty, and the plays of the Ming and Qing Dynasties also had its shadow. Some people also said that it came from the fourth volume of "Six Du Ji Jing","Fa Shi Prince Ben Sheng", but there were doubts. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the monarch wants the minister to die, the minister must die. Who is it that you are talking about?
" If the monarch wants the subject to die, the subject must die " was not directed at a particular person, but rather reflected the concept of the relationship between monarch and subject in the ancient feudal autocratic society. Under the feudal dynasty system, the emperor had supreme power. When the emperor asked his subjects to die, they were often thought to have to obey. For example, after the death of Qin Shihuang, Zhao Gao, Li Si, and Hu Hai colluded to tamper with the imperial edict and ordered Fusu to die. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty executed Yan Yi for the crime of "silent criticism" because he disagreed with the imperial edict. These examples all reflected the supreme power of the emperor and the weakness of the courtiers under the imperial power, but this concept did not refer to a specific person. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the monarch doubts the minister, the minister will die. If the minister doubts the monarch, the minister will die
If the monarch suspects the minister, the minister will die. If the minister suspects the monarch, the minister will rebel. In the relationship between the feudal emperor and his courtiers, the emperor's suspicion would often cause the courtiers to fall into a desperate situation, because the emperor held the power of life and death. Once he had doubts about his courtiers, the courtiers might suffer a fatal disaster. When a subject had doubts about the emperor, it was often because they felt that their own safety was threatened. Under such circumstances, the subject might walk the path of rebellion. For example, many generals in history would be worried about their safety if they were suspected by the emperor when they had a large number of troops. If they felt the emperor's unfair treatment or sensed danger, they might also have the mentality of rebellion. From the perspective of 'if the sovereign suspects a subject, then the subject must die', a subject like Hou Junji, who had made illustrious military achievements, was now in danger after his actions were suspected by the sovereign. From the perspective of " if a minister suspects the monarch, the minister will rebel ", some ministers may rebel when they feel that the monarch's treatment is unfair or their lives are in danger. Of course, whether this rebellion succeeds or not is another matter. In many cases, even if the minister has a large number of troops, it is difficult to rebel successfully. This involves the emperor's power, the loyalty of the minister, feudal ethics and morality, and many other factors. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the monarch doubts the minister, the minister will die
If the monarch trusts the minister, the minister will be loyal; If the monarch loves the minister, the minister will respect him; If the monarch values the minister, the minister will repay him. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
The meaning of the monarch doubting the minister, the minister must die
If the monarch doubted the subject, the subject would die. This meant that if the monarch doubted the subject, the subject would definitely face death. This expression reflected a typical characteristic of the relationship between the monarch and his subjects under the feudal autocratic system. The monarch had supreme power, and the life and death of the courtiers often depended on the attitude and trust of the monarch. Once the monarch had doubts about the loyalty or motives of his subjects, his subjects would be in an extremely dangerous situation and might be persecuted or even executed. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the king wants me to die, I have to die.
" If the monarch wants his subjects to die, his subjects have to die." This phrase originated from the " Story of the Pipa " at the end of the Yuan Dynasty. There were similar expressions in the dramas of the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Some people say that it comes from the fourth volume of the Six Degrees Collection Sutra, but there are doubts. It did not come from Confucianism. Although many people mistakenly thought that it was the content of feudal ethics advocated by Confucius, in fact, the relationship between monarch and minister advocated by Confucius was that "the monarch sends his subjects with courtesy, and the subjects serve the monarch with loyalty". Mencius said,"If the monarch treats his subjects as his own hands and feet, then the subjects treat the monarch as their confidants; Xunzi proposed the idea of following the Tao and not the monarch. The relationship between the monarch and his subjects in the Pre-Qin Confucianism was a kind of equal relationship. The pursuit of loyalty between the upper and lower levels was not this kind of blind loyalty. In addition, many people thought that it was a way for the emperor to restrain his subjects in the feudal rule of "eliminating all schools of thought and only respecting Confucianism", but this was a misunderstanding. Some people mistakenly thought that Zhu Bajie said it in Journey to the West, but this was just a joke. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the king wants his subjects to die, they have to die
In ancient China, there were expressions such as " a horse without two saddles, a loyal minister does not serve two masters " to show the loyalty of the courtiers to the monarch. However, there were also words such as " the monarch wants the courtiers to die, and the courtiers have to die " to express the courtiers 'absolute obedience to the will of the monarch. In the traditional Confucian concept of monarch and minister, the monarch was in a noble and dominant position, and the courtiers had to absolutely obey the monarch. However, this concept had been challenged and evolved in different historical periods, such as the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period, the discussion of the rationality of the behavior of " courtiers killing the monarch ", and the impact of the Western concept of equality on the traditional concept of monarch and minister in modern times. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the king wants me to die, I dare not not die
" If the monarch wants the subject to die, the subject would not dare to not die." This concept was a manifestation of the ideology of the feudal era. From the source, although it was commonly seen in novels such as Romance of the Gods and Journey to the West, it did not originate from the orthodox ideas of Confucian classics. In the early days of Confucianism, Confucius advocated that " the monarch should treat his subjects with courtesy, and the subjects should serve the monarch with loyalty." Mencius even believed that if the monarch treated his subjects as his own hands and feet, the subjects would treat the monarch as his confidant. If the monarch treated his subjects as dogs and horses, the subjects would treat the monarch as their countrymen. If the monarch treated his subjects as dirt, the subjects would treat the monarch as their enemy. It could be seen that the loyalty of the early Confucians was conditioned. In the actual situation of the feudal dynasty, the emperor had supreme power. If a courtier disobeyed the emperor's orders, it was often regarded as disloyalty and could face severe punishment or even implicate the family. However, there were also cases in history where courtiers tried to save their lives by special means when the monarch asked them to die, such as using their achievements, connections, or the emotions of the monarch to defend themselves. However, this was often accompanied by great risks, and it was closely related to the political environment at that time, the personality of the monarch, and other factors. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the king wants me to die, I have to die.
" If the ruler wants the subject to die, the subject must die." There was no fixed next sentence to correspond to it. However, there were similar expressions such as " If the father wants the son to die, the son has to die." This expression reflected the supreme authority of the feudal era, such as monarchical power and paternal power. However, from a modern point of view, these ideas were feudal. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
If the king wants his subjects to die, they have to die. What's the second half of the sentence?
The second half of the sentence," If the ruler wants the subject to die, the subject has to die ", was a common saying," If the father wants the son to die, the son has to die." This statement reflected the relationship between monarch and minister and father and son under the traditional feudal ethics. However, in fact, Confucianism did not completely agree with the extreme concept of " if the monarch wants the subject to die, the subject must die ". Later generations more regarded it as a strengthened ideology under the feudal autocracy. The novel " Half Conspiracy for the Court and Half Conspiracy for the Monarch " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!