Destroying cultural relics will be dealt with according to law
Our country's laws have clear regulations on the destruction of cultural relics. Those who intentionally destroy precious cultural relics protected by the state or cultural relics designated as key cultural relics protection sites at the national level or provincial level shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; if the circumstances are serious, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years, and shall also be fined. Those who deliberately destroy places of interest and historical sites protected by the state, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention, and shall also, or shall only, be fined. Those who damage precious cultural relics protected by the state or cultural relics that have been designated as key cultural relics protection sites at the national level or cultural relics protection sites at the provincial level by negligence, causing serious consequences, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. In addition, if a staff member of a state organ is seriously irresponsible and causes the damage or loss of precious cultural relics, the consequences will be serious. He will be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. If it causes the damage or loss of national first, second and third-class cultural relics, or causes the damage of national key cultural relics protection units or provincial cultural relics protection units, a case will be filed. Read more exciting novels for free
Inherit cultural relics according to law
In China, citizens could inherit cultural relics according to the law. The Inheritance Law clearly stipulated that a citizen's cultural relics belonged to the category of inheritance and could be inherited. At the same time, the Cultural Relics Protection Law also allowed citizens to obtain cultural relics through legal inheritance and other methods. Ancestral cultural relics could be obtained through inheritance, and the private property rights of ancestral cultural relics were protected by law. However, the owners of cultural relics must abide by the laws and regulations of the state regarding the protection of cultural relics. For example, in the process of inheritance, if it involved cultural relics left in the underground, inland waters, and territorial waters, they generally belonged to the state. However, if it was clearly a cultural relic passed down from one's ancestors, it could be legally inherited by the legal heir under the circumstances of compliance with relevant regulations. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Destroying cultural relics and filming
During the filming process, there were cases of destroying cultural relics. For example, Zhang Danfeng's first work after his comeback, Tiger Roaring Forest, was filmed in Yunshantun, Anshun City, Guizhou Province. Without approval from the cultural relics department, he arbitrarily painted the cultural relics and other destructive acts. The cultural relics department intervened in the investigation and ordered it to be rectified. This kind of destruction of cultural relics not only damaged the historical and cultural value of the cultural relics themselves, but also violated the relevant cultural relics protection regulations, and would cause public dissatisfaction and boycott. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Sentence for destroying cultural relics
Whoever intentionally destroys precious cultural relics protected by the state or cultural relics designated as key cultural relics protection sites at the national level or provincial level shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years, and shall also be fined. Those who intentionally destroy scenic spots and historical sites protected by the state, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention, and shall also, or shall only, be fined. Whoever negligently destroys precious cultural relics protected by the state or cultural relics designated as key cultural relics protection sites at the national level or provincial level, causing serious consequences, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. Grave robbing and selling cultural relics of the Tang Dynasty were sentenced to ten years in prison. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Destroying cultural relics during filming
The phenomenon of destroying cultural relics during filming often occurred. On the one hand, with the development of the film and television industry, the phenomenon of shooting movies and television shows about cultural relics and historical sites, as well as using cultural relics and historical sites as scenes to shoot feature films and television dramas, was increasing day by day. However, some of the crew lacked knowledge about cultural relics protection. When filming in cultural relics and historical sites, they would cause damage to cultural relics. For example, in May 2004, in order to shoot "The Promise," the film crew built roads and temporary buildings in Bigu Heavenly Lake, and even destroyed the mountain azalea. In order to ensure the safety of cultural relics and historical sites, the Ministry of Culture issued the "Temporary Regulations on Cultural Relics in Film and Television Filming" on April 19, 1985. It clearly stipulated that the interior of the ancient buildings of the national key cultural relics protection units shall not be used as shooting scenes; The key cultural relics protection units of provinces, autonomous regions and cities directly under the Central Government may be relaxed appropriately, but the ancient buildings with specific important cultural relics shall not be provided for shooting interior scenes; The supply of key cultural relics protection units at the city and county levels and ancient buildings that have not been announced as cultural relics protection units shall be decided by the cultural relics administrative departments of provinces, autonomous regions and cities directly under the Central Government according to relevant principles. The introduction of these regulations was aimed at regulating film and television shooting behavior, reducing the damage to cultural relics during filming, and protecting the rights and interests of the country. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Cultural Relics Law
The revised draft of the Cultural Relics Protection Law had been reviewed many times and publicly consulted. On June 25,2024, the 10th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress reviewed the Cultural Relics Protection Law (revised draft) for the second time and published the Cultural Relics Protection Law (second review draft of the revised draft) for public comments (deadline: July 27,2024). In the revised draft, there were many changes to the relevant provisions of folk collections and cultural relics auctions. For example, in the aspect of folk collection transactions, some cultural relics were not allowed to be bought or sold before the revision, but after the revision, it was clarified that no unit or individual was allowed to buy or sell state-owned cultural relics (except those permitted by the state), cultural relics collected by cultural relics collection units, stolen and smuggled cultural relics, etc. As for folk donation of cultural relics, the main body and method of reward for the donor were adjusted before and after the revision, and it was emphasized that cultural relics collection units should respect the wishes of the donor, etc. In terms of auction management methods, it was clear that cultural relics purchase and sale enterprises and cultural relics auction enterprises should obtain corresponding qualifications respectively and should not cross operations. In addition, some of the suggestions put forward by the Law Working Committee of the Green Association were also adopted, such as adding "including immovable cultural relics and movable cultural relics" in the definition of cultural relics, increasing the content of public participation, carrying out the evaluation of mobile cultural relics protection, increasing the participation of social groups in cultural relics protection, etc. The second review draft of the revised draft also reflected the new requirements for the protection of cultural relics in the new era, such as writing the 22-word working policy of "protection first, strengthening management, excavating value, effective utilization and making cultural relics live" into the law, and making changes in many aspects such as cultural relics protection management, value excavation interpretation, resource investigation, talent team construction, social force participation, etc. The 12th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress will be held in Beijing from November 4 to 8. The chairman's meeting suggested that the meeting review the revised draft of the Cultural Relics Protection Law and other contents. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Be wary of hype in the name of destroying cultural relics
In the field of cultural relics protection, it was indeed necessary to be wary of the act of creating hype in the name of destroying cultural relics. For example, there was a netizen named " Thousand Mountains " who claimed to have taken stones from the Nine Dragon Wall and Yuanmingyuan Palace as " family heirlooms " on Weibo. He claimed that the yellow stone was bitten off from the dragon head of the Nine Dragon Wall in the Forbidden City. This remark caused a lot of criticism from netizens, but the netizen later clarified that it was a joke. The Palace Museum confirmed on the spot that there was no man-made damage to the Nine Dragon Wall. It was not advisable to use the public's attention to the protection of cultural relics to create hype. On the one hand, it would mislead the public and cause unnecessary panic and misunderstanding. On the other hand, such false hype would interfere with the normal protection of cultural relics and divert the attention of society from the real protection of cultural relics. The real protection of cultural relics required people to uphold a serious and responsible attitude, not to use cultural relics for improper hype. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Criminal law destroys cultural relics
In China's criminal law, the relevant provisions concerning the destruction of cultural relics were as follows: - ** Destruction of precious cultural relics, scenic spots and historical sites **: This was a crime that disrupted social management order. The object of the violation was the state's management of cultural relics and scenic spots and historic sites, and the target of the crime was precious cultural relics and scenic spots and historic sites. The objective aspect was the act of damaging or destroying precious cultural relics, places of interest, and the subjective aspect was intentional, that is, deliberately destroying precious cultural relics or places of interest. - ** Intentionally damaging precious cultural relics protected by the state or cultural relics that have been identified as national key cultural relics protection sites or provincial cultural relics protection sites **: Those who have caused the damage of more than five Grade 3 cultural relics, the damage of Grade 2 cultural relics, the serious damage or loss of the main body of the national key cultural relics protection unit or the provincial cultural relics protection unit, or the repeated damage or damage of the main body of multiple national key cultural relics protection units or provincial cultural relics protection units shall be deemed as "serious circumstances". Those who deliberately destroy cultural relics that have been identified as national key cultural relics protection units or provincial cultural relics protection units in scenic spots shall be convicted and sentenced according to relevant regulations. - ** Intentionally damaging state-protected scenic spots and historical sites **: Serious damage or loss of scenic spots and historical sites, multiple damage or damage of multiple scenic spots and historical sites, etc. are identified as "serious circumstances". Those who carry out relevant acts and refuse to implement the administrative decisions or orders made by the competent administrative departments of the state to stop the encroachment on cultural relics shall be severely punished according to the circumstances. - <strong>**</strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong> - ** Crime of dereliction of duty causing the destruction or loss of precious cultural relics **: If a staff member of a state organ is seriously irresponsible and causes the destruction or loss of precious cultural relics, the consequences will be serious. He will be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. - ** Smuggling cultural relics that are prohibited from being exported by the state **: If the circumstances are particularly serious, the offender shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than ten years or life imprisonment, and his property shall be confiscated. In addition, those who deliberately destroy the cultural relics of provincial cultural relics protection units shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and shall also be fined, or shall only be fined; if the circumstances are serious, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years, and shall also be fined. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The content of the law on the crime of reselling cultural relics
According to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, anyone who resells cultural relics prohibited by the state for profit, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention, and shall also be fined; if the circumstances are especially serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than ten years, and shall also be fined. If a unit commits this crime, the unit shall be fined, and the person in charge and other directly responsible personnel shall be punished in accordance with the above-mentioned provisions. Reselling referred to the act of selling or buying cultural relics that were prohibited by the state for profit. The object of reselling could only be cultural relics that were prohibited by the state. To constitute the crime of reselling cultural relics, it was also required to have serious elements. For example, reselling Class III cultural relics, if the amount of illegal profits was large, if the amount of illegal business was large, or reselling cultural relics below Class III for many times, reselling many cultural relics below Class III, etc., were serious circumstances; Reselling Class II cultural relics, reselling Class I cultural relics, if the amount of illegal profits was huge, if the amount of illegal business was huge, or reselling rare national treasures, etc. were especially serious circumstances. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
What are the advantages of the Cultural Relics Protection Law?
The Cultural Relics Protection Law has the following advantages: 1. ** Protecting cultural relics **: To provide specifications for the original site protection of cultural relics protection units, protect cultural relics, an important non-regenerative cultural resource, effectively prevent construction units from evading legal supervision, and strengthen the protection of cultural relics. 2. ** Promotion of basic work **: Under its strong protection, various basic work such as the investigation and filing of cultural relics resources can be consolidated. 3. ** Assist in key work **: To promote significant results in key work such as the protection of large sites. 4. ** Normalizing administrative work **: Make the nationwide special supervision of administrative law enforcement effective, continuously improve the level of administration of cultural relics departments at all levels according to law, gradually integrate the work of cultural relics protection into the system and standardized track, and help raise the awareness of the whole society to protect cultural heritage according to law. 5. ** To improve the approval process **: For example, in the work related to the protection of the original site of a cultural relic protection site, the revision of the Cultural Relics Protection Law changed the approval of cultural relic protection measures from the pre-approval of project approval to parallel approval. The approval could be completed before the project started, which improved the approval efficiency. At the same time, by adding prohibitions on cultural relics protection measures, construction could not be started without approval, effectively making up for possible supervision problems. 6. ** Stimulate the vitality of the market and society **: Revising the Law on the Protection of Cultural Relics can promote the reform of simple administration and delegation of power, the combination of deregulation and management, and the optimization of service reform. It can stimulate the innovation and vitality of the market and society to a greater extent, and remove the obstacles in the system for the reform of "deregulation". <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Administrative Law Enforcement System of the Cultural Relics Bureau
The State Administration of Cultural Relics issued the "three systems" for the administrative enforcement of cultural relics, including the "Regulations on the Public Announcement of the Administrative Enforcement of Cultural Relics (Trial)","Regulations on the Recording of the Whole Course of the Administrative Enforcement of Cultural Relics (Trial)" and "Regulations on the Review of the Administrative Enforcement of Major Cultural Relics (Trial)". Regarding the publicity of cultural relics administrative law enforcement, in accordance with the principle of "whoever enforces the law shall publicize", it clearly stipulated the contents of the administrative law enforcement agencies of cultural relics to actively publicize the administrative law enforcement information from three aspects: strengthening the prior publicity, regulating the publicity during the event, and strengthening the publicity after the event. In terms of the record of the whole process of cultural relics administrative law enforcement, it is stipulated that the administrative law enforcement agencies of cultural relics should record the whole process of law enforcement and archive and preserve it in a comprehensive and systematic way from four aspects: perfecting written records, regulating audio and video records, strictly recording and filing, and giving full play to the role of records. Regarding the legal review of major cultural relics administrative law enforcement decisions, the specific procedures and requirements for the legal review of major cultural relics administrative law enforcement decisions by the cultural relics administrative law enforcement agencies were stipulated in four aspects: the clear review organization, the scope of the review, the content of the review, and the responsibility for the review. In addition, the Taiyuan City Relics Bureau also had three administrative law enforcement systems, including the law enforcement publicity system, the administrative law enforcement process record system, the major administrative law enforcement decision legal review system, as well as the "double random, one public" work implementation rules, the administrative law enforcement audio and video recording equipment use management regulations, the administrative law enforcement file management system, and so on. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>