Wild Child's Psychology

Answer 1

Wild Child had a unique psychological aspect that was worth exploring.

From the perspective of character creation and plot design, the film tells the story of the "thief" brother Ma Liang and the "orphan" brother Xuan Xuan. On the psychological level, they were " distressed children " struggling on the edge of society. This kind of growing environment must have a profound impact on their psychology. Their mutual support in the wandering life could be seen as a way to seek psychological comfort and a sense of belonging in adversity. The elder brother took on the responsibility of taking care of his younger brother. Perhaps there was an instinctive understanding of the role of the family behind this. Although they were in the predicament of wandering, this relationship gave each other psychological support and was an important spiritual pillar for them to survive in a difficult environment.

However, from the perspective of the audience's feedback, the film was lacking in the depth of the character's psychology. For example, in the description of brotherhood, the film wanted to show deep brotherhood, but the emotional description was too stiff, lacking depth and layering, making people feel that the character was not realistic. This might be due to the fact that the complex psychological activities such as hesitation and entanglement in the character's heart were not fully explored during the construction of the plot, making it difficult for the audience to resonate with the emotions of the character. Some of the dialogue designs in the film were too straightforward and simple, which did not reflect the deep friendship between the characters. This reflected the lack of detail in the psychological description of the characters.

From the perspective of the influence of an actor's performance on psychological portrayals, although the image of Wang Junkai's character was clean, it was difficult for the audience to fully believe in the character's poor life. The actor gave people a deliberate and mechanical feeling when performing, and failed to present the psychological state that the character should have, thus affecting the audience's understanding and empathy for the character's inner world. This also indirectly reflected that the movie did not do a good job in conveying the psychological level of the characters through the actors.

On the whole, although " Wild Child " tried to dig into some deep emotional issues, it seemed to be unable to describe the psychological part of the subtle feelings between the brothers. As a result, the emotional connection in the hearts of the characters that the audience expected to see was not well presented, affecting the overall viewing experience of the film and the audience's experience.

Watching " Wild Child " wasn't enough. Everyone, please click to read the novel!