Well, it's a bit of a gray area. Fantasy fiction often has its own made - up worlds and cultures. If the world in the story has a rougher or more gritty setting, these words might fit in. But publishers and readers vary in their tolerance. Some might see it as unprofessional or too vulgar, while others might embrace it as part of a unique voice for the story.
It depends. In some cases, it can add a sense of realism or edginess to the story. However, it might also turn off some readers who prefer cleaner language. If the target audience is more mature and the use of such words serves a purpose in character development or creating a particular atmosphere, it could be okay.
Using'shit', 'damn', 'hell' in fantasy fiction can be a double - edged sword. On one hand, it can make the dialogue more natural and reflect the emotions of the characters more vividly. For example, if a character is frustrated or angry, these words can come out in the heat of the moment. On the other hand, it can limit the audience. Younger readers or those who are sensitive to such language may be put off. Also, from a creative perspective, there are often other ways to convey the same intensity without using these potentially offensive words.
Using these words in fantasy fiction has several implications. Firstly, it can create a sense of authenticity in the characters' speech. However, it may also face criticism from some readers who expect a more refined language in the genre. Secondly, it can be a way to break the traditional, often more formal language of fantasy. But it could also lead to the work being labeled as inappropriate. Overall, the author needs to weigh the benefits against the potential drawbacks carefully.
No. Using such offensive language is never appropriate in civilized communication. There are better ways to critique or discuss works of pulp fiction without resorting to such vulgarity.
A dingbat fiction can be used when you aim for a humorous or unconventional approach. It's suitable when you want to stand out and offer something fresh and unexpected. However, it might not be the best choice for serious or straightforward storylines.
Using passive voice in fiction isn't always a bad thing. It can be useful for emphasizing certain elements or creating a specific tone. But overusing it might make the writing seem less dynamic.
You might use exposition when you need to explain complex concepts or characters' backstories that are crucial for understanding the story. But be careful not to overdo it and bog down the pace. A little at a time, when it makes sense within the context of the story, is usually best.
I wouldn't recommend it too often. 'Shit' is a vulgar word and could make your novel seem less refined. But if it's crucial for a specific character or moment and you handle it appropriately, it might work. Just be aware of the potential reactions and make sure it doesn't overshadow the quality of your writing.
When you want to offer a comprehensive view of the fictional world and its various elements, the third person is suitable. It allows you to describe things from an outsider's viewpoint and paint a bigger picture.
Definitely not. Fanfic should generally focus on positive, respectful and ethical content. This kind of description violates basic moral and ethical norms. Gay teens should be respected and not be associated with such strange and unseemly elements like 'cow shit'.
Well, first you need to have a compelling plot that keeps the readers engaged. Also, create vivid and relatable characters that people care about.
Read a lot of great fiction works to understand different styles and techniques. Also, practice regularly and get feedback from others.