The evaluation could be based on multiple factors. Character development is one. In Japanese crime novels, the characters are often complex and multi - faceted. If the NY Times Book Review sees that the author has done a great job in creating believable and interesting characters, it would be a plus. Also, the way the mystery is crafted. Does it keep the reader guessing until the very end? And finally, the cultural authenticity. If the novel can transport the Western reader into the heart of Japanese culture while telling a crime story, it would likely be well - received.
They also consider the literary merit. This includes the quality of the writing, such as the prose style, the use of imagery, and the pacing. A historical novel with beautiful, evocative language that draws the reader in and keeps them engaged will be rated more highly. For instance, a novel that uses vivid descriptions to bring a long - ago city to life is likely to get a good review.
I'm not sure specifically which Japanese crime novels have been reviewed in the NY Times Book Review recently. However, some well - known Japanese crime novelists include Keigo Higashino. His works often feature intricate plots and psychological depth. You could check the NY Times Book Review archives to find more.
I'm not entirely sure, but probably they look at the popularity of the author. If an author has a big following in the romance genre, they might be more likely to be reviewed. Also, new and upcoming trends in romance might catch their eye.
The review might look at how Grisham structures his novels. Does he start with an interesting hook? Does he develop the plot in a logical and engaging manner? In terms of his writing style, it could consider his use of description. Does he vividly describe the settings, the courtroom scenes, and the characters' appearances? Also, the review could analyze his use of foreshadowing. If he can subtly hint at future events, it adds to the suspense of the story. His ability to handle different points of view, if he switches between characters' perspectives smoothly, would also be a factor in evaluating his writing.
It might give a positive evaluation, highlighting the engaging plot and well - developed characters.
The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.
The NY Times Book Review of romance novels can be quite interesting. They consider not only the romantic elements but also the overall quality of the book. Sometimes, a romance novel might be lauded for its exploration of social issues within the context of the love story. For instance, a novel that deals with class differences or cultural clashes while still maintaining a strong romantic plot would be positively reviewed.
Another could be 'All the Light We Cannot See' by Anthony Doerr. This novel set during World War II has been highly regarded. It weaves together the stories of a blind French girl and a German boy, exploring themes of war, survival, and human connection against the backdrop of a major historical event.
The book review may say that the plots of Feluda stories are full of twists and turns. Each mystery has its own set of clues and red herrings that keep the reader guessing until the very end.
The review might say the acting in 'Marriage Story' is superb. The actors likely brought the characters to life in a very believable way.