The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.
Popularity among early readers and the buzz in the literary community can play a role. If a novel is generating a lot of talk on social media or among booksellers, The New York Times might choose to review it to add to the conversation.
They probably look at the popularity of the book among readers. If a lot of people are talking about a particular novel, it might catch their attention.
The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.
The New York Times likely considers factors such as the quality of the art. If the illustrations are unique, detailed, and enhance the story, it's more likely to be noticed. For example, in a graphic novel like 'Fun Home', the detailed and evocative drawings play a huge role in bringing the story to life.
Well, it could be a combination of factors. They might take into account the reputation of the author. If it's an established author with a following, their new book is likely to be considered. Also, books that are winning awards or getting a lot of pre - publication hype are probably more likely to be selected. They may also receive submissions from publishers, and then their editors decide which ones seem the most interesting and relevant to their readership. And perhaps they have a team that scouts for unique or under - the - radar books that deserve more attention.
The review could also mention the theme of self - discovery within the context of a marriage. As the characters go through the divorce process, they also learn more about themselves. The New York Times might discuss how the film presents this journey of self - discovery as an important part of the overall story.
The NYT reviews often focus on the historical accuracy of the work. If the story is set in a particular era, they check if the details like clothing, language, and social norms are correct.
The review may point out that the actors' chemistry is palpable. They are able to show the love that once was between the characters as well as the growing animosity during the divorce process. Their ability to switch between different emotions seamlessly is a key factor in the movie's success.
I'm not entirely sure about the exact selection process. But it probably depends on the relevance and importance of the topics. Maybe they choose stories that are of high interest to a wide range of readers, like reviews of blockbuster movies or best - selling books.
The New York Times could praise the music in 'West Side Story' for its emotional depth. The songs are not just there for entertainment but also to drive the story forward. For example, the love songs between the main characters are very powerful. They may also mention how the music is arranged to build tension during the conflict scenes between the two gangs.