The review may point out that the actors' chemistry is palpable. They are able to show the love that once was between the characters as well as the growing animosity during the divorce process. Their ability to switch between different emotions seamlessly is a key factor in the movie's success.
Well, the NYT could mention that the acting in 'Marriage Story' is what really drives the film. The actors are not only able to show the big, emotional outbursts but also the small, subtle moments of doubt, regret, and hope. Their performances are nuanced and help the audience understand the complex nature of the characters' relationship.
The review might say the acting in 'Marriage Story' is superb. The actors likely brought the characters to life in a very believable way.
The review could also mention the theme of self - discovery within the context of a marriage. As the characters go through the divorce process, they also learn more about themselves. The New York Times might discuss how the film presents this journey of self - discovery as an important part of the overall story.
Maybe the review in the New York Times praised the actors for their ability to convey the intense emotions in West Side Story. Their performances in the love scenes and the fight scenes could have been highlighted.
The New York Times review of Marriage Story probably delves into the characters' relationships with each other. It could examine how the main couple interacts with their families and friends during this difficult time. It may also analyze the emotional states of the characters, like the moments of anger, sadness, and hope, and how well the actors bring these emotions to life on screen. This helps the audience understand the characters better and see the full picture of the marriage story.
The New York Times review of 'Marriage Story' may have focused on several aspects. Firstly, it could have talked about how the movie delved deep into the characters' psyches. The lead actors' portrayals were so nuanced that it made the story feel very real. Secondly, the review might have mentioned the film's pacing. It didn't seem rushed, allowing the audience to fully experience each stage of the marriage's dissolution. Additionally, the movie's use of dialogue was probably praised. The conversations between the characters were so raw and honest, which added to the overall authenticity of the story. It's a movie that doesn't shy away from showing the ugly as well as the beautiful parts of a relationship, and the review may have highlighted this aspect as well.
The New York Times review might state that the movie's impact lies in its ability to start conversations. It can get people talking about marriage, divorce, and the importance of communication in relationships. This could lead to a greater understanding among the audience about these complex topics.
Popularity among early readers and the buzz in the literary community can play a role. If a novel is generating a lot of talk on social media or among booksellers, The New York Times might choose to review it to add to the conversation.
They probably look at the popularity of the book among readers. If a lot of people are talking about a particular novel, it might catch their attention.
The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.
The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.