Definitely not. This kind of so - called 'fiction' goes against the basic principles of human - centered values. We should focus on literature that reflects real human emotions, relationships, and positive life experiences, not something with abnormal and inappropriate themes like this.
Definitely not. It's a form of exploitation. People with amputations are real individuals with their own identities and experiences, not objects for sexualized stories. This type of 'fiction' perpetuates harmful stereotypes and disrespects the disabled community.
No. Erotic fiction in general often contains inappropriate sexual content, and 'furry' adds a non - human or anthropomorphic element which can make it even more strange and not suitable for general acceptance in the realm of proper literature.
Definitely not. 'Erotic school girl fiction' is inappropriate for several reasons. Firstly, it can be seen as a form of sexual exploitation of a particular group. Secondly, it doesn't conform to the standards of good taste and decency that are expected in literature. We should be promoting literature that is respectful, educational, and inspiring, not something that objectifies and sexualizes school - girls.
No. 'Forced exercise' in an erotic context often involves non - consensual or inappropriate themes which are not acceptable in literature. Literature should promote positive values and healthy relationships, not such potentially harmful and unethical content.
No. Such stories are not acceptable as they often involve abnormal and unethical relationships that violate moral and ethical norms.
In general, it's not acceptable. While there may be some niche communities that might tolerate it to a certain extent, from a broader perspective, it violates the norms of decency. It objectifies people and reduces the art of writing to just sexual fantasies, which is not what good literature is about.
No. Erotic stories often involve inappropriate sexual content, and the idea of being 'brainwashed' in this context is also unethical. Literature should promote positive values, healthy relationships, and good moral concepts rather than such improper and potentially harmful content.
No. It's completely unacceptable. Female castration is a form of violence against women, and fictionalizing it is not only unethical but also promotes a harmful view towards women.
Self harm fiction can be acceptable in certain contexts. If it's used as a tool to educate about the seriousness of self - harm, mental health, and the importance of getting help, then it has value. But if it's just for shock value or to seem edgy without any real purpose, then it's not acceptable. For example, a story that realistically portrays a character's journey through self - harm to recovery can be acceptable, but one that seems to promote self - harm is not.
Definitely not. Pedophilia is a heinous act, and creating fiction around it is wrong. Society should condemn such content as it can have a negative impact on people's values and may even encourage inappropriate behavior towards children.