He likely meant that by reading great fiction, writers can gain inspiration. Great works of fiction expose writers to different writing styles, characters, and story structures. It's like a master class in writing. For example, reading Dickens can teach about vivid character descriptions, and reading Kafka might inspire unique ways of creating a sense of unease in a story.
It means that great fiction serves as a wellspring of knowledge and creativity for writers. Reading the works of other greats helps in understanding various literary techniques, such as how to build suspense or develop complex characters. Great writers can learn from the successes and even the mistakes of those who came before them in the realm of great fiction.
Hemingway was suggesting that great fiction is a source of learning for writers. When a writer reads great fiction, they can observe how other authors handle elements like dialogue, pacing, and plot twists. It's a way to soak up the best practices in the field. For instance, reading Jane Austen can show how to write sharp and witty dialogue that also reveals character traits.
Well, it's hard to pinpoint exactly who made that statement. It might have been someone influential in the literary world, but without more context, it's tough to say for sure.
I'm not sure who exactly said it. But it might be a common belief among literary experts that reading great fiction helps writers learn and grow.
Great writers on the art of fiction contribute by creating new literary styles. For example, James Joyce's use of stream - of - consciousness in 'Ulysses' introduced a whole new way of presenting a character's thoughts. They also contribute by exploring deep human emotions. Take Tolstoy in 'Anna Karenina', he delved into love, jealousy, and social pressure.
It helps in developing style. Reading different great fictions exposes a writer to diverse writing styles, and they can pick elements they like. For example, reading Faulkner's long, complex sentences might inspire a writer to experiment with sentence structure.
Some of the great writers on the art of fiction include Henry James. His works often delved deeply into the psychological aspects of his characters. Another is E.M. Forster, who explored themes like class, culture, and human relationships in his novels. Virginia Woolf was also a significant figure, known for her stream - of - consciousness writing technique which revolutionized the way fiction was written.
Some excellent Irish fiction books include 'The Commitments' by Roddy Doyle. It's a fun and engaging read that gives insights into Irish culture. 'At Swim - Two - Birds' by Flann O'Brien is also a great choice. It's a very imaginative and somewhat surreal piece of fiction. And 'The Gathering' by Anne Enright, which is a powerful exploration of family and Irish identity in the context of a fictional story.
The statement 'government is that great fiction' perhaps suggests that government is an elaborate and man - made idea. It's not a tangible, natural thing like a tree or a river. Governments are formed through social contracts and agreements among people. They exist in the realm of ideas and institutions. We give them power and legitimacy, which makes it seem like a sort of fictional entity that has real - world consequences. For example, the way a government's currency system works or its laws on property are all constructs that are part of this 'fiction' that we as a society uphold.
This statement might suggest that the state is a fictional entity in that it is often idealized. For example, states are often presented as unified and harmonious entities, but in reality, they are made up of diverse groups with different interests, and the idea of a monolithic 'state' is a sort of fiction. It also could mean that the power and authority we attribute to the state are not as absolute as they seem, as they are often based on social contracts that are more fluid and changeable than we sometimes assume.
This statement might suggest that the idea of government is a sort of grand illusion. Governments are made up of various institutions, laws, and people in power. But in a sense, it's a human - created concept that we've come to accept as real and powerful. It often functions based on the collective belief and cooperation of the citizens. If people stop believing in its authority or following its rules, it loses much of its power.
This phrase suggests that the state is a construct that doesn't have an absolute or essential existence. The state is defined by our collective beliefs and actions. We give it power, functions, and a sense of identity. For instance, the state's authority to tax, make laws, and enforce regulations is based on the general acceptance of the people. It's like a fictional story that we all believe in and act according to, but it doesn't exist in the same way as natural physical entities.