It could be due to a change in the original plan. Maybe the author realizes that the character doesn't fit well into the long - term vision of the story. So, they kill off the character early to avoid future plot holes or contradictions. Like in some cases where an author starts with a large cast but later decides to simplify it.
To set a dark or tragic tone. If an author wants to show that the world of the novel is a harsh place from the start, killing off a character early can be an effective way. For instance, in '1984', the way the Party eliminates people early on gives a sense of the totalitarian and dangerous world.
One effect could be shock value. It can jolt the readers and make them more engaged as they try to figure out how the story will progress without that character. For example, in 'Game of Thrones', Ned Stark's early death completely changed the direction of the story and made readers more eager to see how the power struggle would unfold without his influence.
One reason could be to create a sense of extreme tragedy or futility. By eliminating all the characters, the author might be trying to show that in the world of the novel, there is no hope and all are doomed. It could also be a very extreme form of making a statement about the futility of life or the overwhelming power of certain forces, like a cruel and inescapable fate or a devastating event such as a global catastrophe that no one can survive.
One reason could be to create a sense of shock or surprise. It makes the story more unpredictable. For example, in 'Game of Thrones', the sudden death of Ned Stark shocked readers and viewers alike, completely changing the direction of the story.
One pro is that it can create a huge shock value. It can jolt the readers and make them more engaged as they try to figure out how the story will progress without that character. A con could be that readers might get too attached to the character and become very disappointed or even stop reading. Another con is that it might disrupt the planned character arcs and plotlines that were centered around that character.
It would shock them. Readers usually expect some characters to survive, at least the main ones. So, when every character is killed off, it goes against their expectations and leaves them with a sense of disbelief.
Sometimes, it's a way to show the harsh reality of the story's setting. If it's a war - themed novel, killing many characters can depict the horror and destruction of war. Like in 'All Quiet on the Western Front', the large number of deaths among soldiers effectively conveyed the brutality of World War I.
One ethical consideration is respecting the original creator's vision. If the character is important to the source material's overall narrative, killing them off might be seen as undermining the original work. Another aspect is the impact on the fan community. Some fans may have strong emotional attachments to the character, and killing them off could upset or disappoint those fans.
One effect is that it can create a huge shock for the readers. It completely changes the expected narrative direction. For example, in 'Game of Thrones', the death of Ned Stark was a turning point that made the story more unpredictable and full of high - stakes drama.
One possible reason could be a lack of trust. If one of the engaged parties discovers that the other has been lying about something important, it might lead to calling off the engagement. For example, if there are hidden financial problems or a secret relationship in the past.
It could also be due to the fanfic's poor writing quality. If the grammar and spelling are atrocious and it's hard to follow the story. When it comes to Naruto, fans have high expectations. So, if they can't even understand what's going on with Naruto in the fanfic because of bad writing, it can lead to a 'pissed off' reaction.