Another way could be if it's about a character in a story who is coming to terms with their mother's stories, like understanding the family history that the mother has been telling for years, and how that impacts the character's self - discovery and growth.
If we really want to find a non - offensive take, we could think of stories where there is a struggle against a 'demonic' force that has nothing to do with sex. For example, in some religious or mythological stories, heroes fight against demons which is about good versus evil, not any form of sexual relations.
Another non - offensive interpretation could be in the context of some alternative milks. For instance, almond milk or soy milk production. There could be stories about the adults involved in the production process, like how they grow the almonds or soybeans, harvest them, and then turn them into milk - like products. This can involve stories about innovation in the food industry and sustainable farming practices.
As 'erotic dogging' is an inappropriate concept, if we want to reinterpret it in a non - offensive way, we could think of it as 'stories about dogs in unexpected situations'. For example, stories where dogs accidentally end up in strange places and how they adapt.
Given the nature of 'erotic mummification stories', which are likely to violate moral and ethical norms, it's not possible to have a non - offensive interpretation. We should focus on positive and ethical forms of art and literature.
If we assume this is a misnomer and you might actually mean stories about moms in general, there are many. For example, stories of moms being strong single parents, moms who overcome great challenges to raise their children well.
Another example could be a story about a mom's influence on her child's career choice. Maybe she encourages her child to pursue a passion in art, even though it might not be the most conventional choice. She provides support and guidance throughout the process, which is a beautiful and positive mom - related story.
One could potentially see it as a play on words or a very odd way to describe an unexpected or large - scale event in a doctor - related story. Maybe there was a big commotion or a large medical device that was misconstrued in some strange way. But realistically, the phrase is so easily misinterpreted as something vulgar that it's hard to come up with a truly clean - cut non - offensive interpretation.
One possible interpretation could be in the context of very young children. In some cultures, when a child is very young, a mother may assist or be present during potty training. But this is a normal part of child - rearing and not something 'taboo' in the sense of improper. It's about teaching the child basic hygiene and bodily functions.
One possible interpretation could be that in a story, a mother is helping her son get dressed in a hurry, like when they are late for an important event. So she quickly gets him into his pants.
The phrase itself contains vulgar language. However, if we were to re - interpret it in a non - offensive way, we could perhaps think of it as a very strange or made - up phrase that has no real meaning in the context of proper storytelling. So, no, there are no real non - offensive interpretations in the literal sense.