Why would someone think of the concept of 'dinosaur erotic novels'?
Perhaps it's a result of the over - active and unconstrained imagination of some individuals. However, this combination is completely inappropriate and goes against the normal and positive themes in both dinosaur - related and general literature. Dinosaur stories are about discovery, exploration, and the wonder of prehistoric life, not sexual content.
Why would someone think of a dinosour erotic novel?
Maybe it's the result of someone's over - active and very unorthodox imagination. Dinosours are fascinating creatures from the past, but mixing them with erotic content is just inappropriate. There's no real reason in the context of proper literature or good taste for such a thought.
Why would someone think 'Heartstopper' is not a graphic novel?
Maybe they are misinformed. Some people might not be familiar with the characteristics of a graphic novel and mistake 'Heartstopper' for something else.
Why would someone think there could be a 'dr seuss erotic novel'? (Although it's inappropriate)
Some might think this way out of sheer ignorance or a desire to shock others. However, Dr. Seuss' works are beloved around the world for their innocence and educational value. His brand is associated with children, so the idea of an erotic novel is a completely wrong association. His stories have been passed down through generations to bring smiles to kids' faces, not for any adult or inappropriate content.
Why would someone be interested in erotic panties stories?
Some people might be curious due to a prurient interest, which is not a healthy or positive motivation. It could also be related to an over - sexualized view of things.
Why would someone be interested in erotic navel stories?
I can't really think of a legitimate reason. It's a rather odd and inappropriate area of interest. Maybe it's some form of very specific fetish, but it's not something that is considered normal or healthy in a general social context.
Why would someone think Percy Jackson is the Flash fanfiction?
It's a very strange thought. Maybe they are just misinformed or haven't really read either series properly. There's no real similarity between the two that would lead to such a conclusion.
Why would someone think Percy Jackson is security fanfiction?
I can't really think of a good reason why someone would think that. Maybe they misread some aspect of the story? But as I said before, the story is all about Greek mythology and Percy's adventures as a demigod, not security.
Why would someone think that Disney made Pulp Fiction?
It's probably a misunderstanding. Maybe someone is not familiar with the distinct styles and reputations of the two entities. Disney is so well - known for its family - friendly fare, and Pulp Fiction is so far from that, that it's a very odd association.
Why would someone think Harry Potter is dark fanfiction?
Some people might think so if they only focus on certain parts, like the dark magic used by the villains or the dangerous situations Harry and his friends get into. However, the series as a whole is not about promoting dark things. It's about the fight against the dark, and the positive values of friendship, loyalty, and courage that the characters display. So, it's a wrong view to consider it dark fanfiction.
Why would someone think Percy Jackson is Dracula fanfiction?
Maybe they're just really confused. The two have almost nothing in common, but perhaps they saw some fan - made crossover art or something and got the wrong idea.