Mostly not. While literature can deal with themes of desire, when it devolves into just 'lust stories' it becomes more about prurient interests rather than any meaningful exploration of human nature. Good literature aims to enlighten, educate or at least engage in a deeper understanding of the human condition, not just focus on lust.
Definitely not. Such stories are inappropriate and go against the values that literature should convey. Literature should be a medium for positive ideas and emotions, not for such improper content.
The acceptability of real erotica stories in literature is a complex matter. On one hand, in a free - speech context, some might argue that there is room for all forms of expression, including erotica. But on the other hand, from a moral and social - values perspective, it can be seen as degrading or inappropriate. Libraries and schools, for example, usually do not include erotica in their collections as they are meant to serve a wide range of audiences, including children and families.
No, they are not. Erotic content, especially related to such specific and inappropriate themes, goes against the standards of decent literature.
No. Mainstream literature typically adheres to certain moral and ethical standards, and erotic stories with explicit sexual content are not considered acceptable in this context.
In a civilized society, we should promote positive and respectful communication. Discussing sexual content in public is not proper behavior.
Beastialty stories are completely unacceptable in literature. Literature is meant to inspire, educate, and entertain in a positive and moral way. Allowing such inappropriate content would be a violation of the principles of good literature. Instead, we should encourage stories that promote kindness, compassion, and respect for all living beings.
Mostly not. While there may be some forms of adult - oriented literature that might be considered on the fringes, in general, literature is a medium for communication, art, and knowledge. Erotic stories that focus mainly on sexual content don't contribute much in terms of these broader values. For example, great works of literature like 'Moby - Dick' are about much more profound themes such as man's struggle against nature and the human condition, not sexual content.
No. Erodic stories are not acceptable in literature. Literature should aim to enlighten, educate and inspire. Erodic content is not in line with these values.
There are some works that may contain some sexual undertones but are still considered great literature because they use such elements in a very subtle and symbolic way, not for the mere sake of arousal like erot stories. For example, James Joyce's 'Ulysses' has some sexual references but it is a complex exploration of modern life, consciousness, and human relationships. However, pure erot stories are not in the same category as they lack the depth and broader significance of real literature.
In general, erotical stories are not widely accepted in mainstream literature. Mainstream literature usually focuses on themes like human nature, society, and moral values.