One way to distinguish is to research the background of the story. If it's based on a real event, the core elements related to that event are likely truth. Fiction elements often are added to make the story more interesting. In 'The Lost King', if there are elements like a character having extraordinary powers that have no basis in historical records, that's fiction. We can also look at the language used. If it's too flowery or seems to be creating an unrealistic scenario, it might be part of the fictional aspect.
Look at the historical details. If they match with known facts, it's likely truth. If not, it's probably fiction. For example, if the story mentions a building that didn't exist at that time, it's fiction.
Look for evidence. Truth usually has some form of evidence to back it up, whether it's physical evidence, eyewitness accounts, or data. Fiction often lacks such solid support. For instance, in a historical study, we can find artifacts as evidence.
One way is to compare the movie with historical records. If something seems too dramatic or out of place, it might be fiction. For example, if a character makes a heroic move that doesn't seem to be based on any real account, it's likely fictional.
One way is to do research on the real - life drug cartels in Mexico. Compare the facts about their activities, leadership, and territorial control with what's shown in the show. For instance, if a cartel in the show is depicted as having a certain stronghold that doesn't match historical records, that's likely a fictional element.
We can look at reliable historical sources. Primary sources like official documents from that time are a good start.
Consistency is key. The truth should be consistent within itself and with other known facts. Fiction, on the other hand, might have contradictions. For example, in a mystery novel, the author might create red herrings that don't fit with the real solution, but in a true crime account, all the details should be in harmony.
One way is to analyze the evidence presented. Check if it's consistent, logical, and can be verified. Also, consider the credibility of the person or source providing the information.
Well, it often comes down to looking for reliable sources and cross-checking information. If multiple trustworthy sources confirm something, it's more likely to be true.
Another way is to analyze the overall narrative. If a part of the Oppenheimer story seems to serve only the purpose of entertainment like creating an overly dramatic moment, it might be fictional. The truth usually has a more complex and nuanced nature. For example, the real political implications of Oppenheimer's work were far - reaching and complex, and if the movie simplifies it too much for the sake of a clear - cut good - vs - bad narrative, that's where the line between truth and fiction blurs.
One way is to compare the show with real - life news reports about Theranos. If something seems too outlandish in the show, it might be fiction.
One way is to look at the source. If it comes from a reliable, well - researched source, it's more likely to be truth. For example, scientific research papers are often a good source of truth. Fiction, on the other hand, often has elements that are not based on real facts, like magic in fantasy novels.