Well, Roger Ebert was very good at dissecting a movie's themes. For 'Solo', he might have explored themes like heroism and self - discovery which are often present in Star Wars movies. He would have looked at how Han Solo's journey in this movie was about becoming the character we know from the later movies. He would also have commented on the movie's ability to appeal to both long - time Star Wars fans and new audiences. His reviews were always about more than just whether a movie was good or bad, but why it was that way. And for 'Solo', he would have delved deep into all these elements to give a comprehensive assessment.
I'm not sure exactly what Roger Ebert thought as he passed away before this movie was released. But he was known for his in - depth analysis of movies. If he were alive, he might have focused on aspects like the character development of Han Solo, the visual effects which are a big part of Star Wars movies, and how the story fits into the overall Star Wars universe.
Since Roger Ebert was known for his in - depth reviews, he probably analyzed 'A Christmas Story' quite thoroughly. He may have started by talking about how the film immediately draws the viewer in with its relatable premise of a child's desire for a special Christmas present. He would likely have commended the acting, especially the performances of the young actors who brought the story to life. Ebert might also have pointed out how the movie manages to be both funny and heartwarming at the same time, with its comical situations like the leg lamp and the more tender moments between family members. And he would most likely have recognized its status as a beloved Christmas classic that has stood the test of time.
In his review, Roger Ebert lauded Pulp Fiction for being a game - changer. He pointed out that it had a fresh take on the crime genre. The non - linear storytelling made the audience pay closer attention and get more involved. He also liked the fact that the movie had a great deal of replay value as new things could be noticed with each viewing.
He reviewed it positively. He might have been impressed by the movie's creativity.
It was an interesting addition to the Star Wars universe. The movie did a great job of exploring Han Solo's backstory. The action scenes were exciting, especially the space battles. However, some fans thought it didn't quite capture the essence of the original trilogy as well as it could have.
It was a great addition to the Star Wars franchise. The movie really delved into Han Solo's backstory in an interesting way. The action scenes were exciting, especially the space battles and the heist sequences. Alden Ehrenreich did a decent job of portraying the young Han Solo, capturing some of the charm and roguishness that we expect from the character.
Well, 'Solo: A Star Wars Story' was a mixed bag. On one hand, the movie's set design and special effects were top - notch. It really brought the seedy underbelly of the Star Wars universe to life. But the plot had some problems. It seemed to be trying too hard to fill in the backstory of Han Solo. I liked the character development of Qi'ra, but overall, the movie didn't have the same emotional depth as other Star Wars films.
Solo: A Star Wars Story is an exciting addition to the Star Wars franchise. The movie does a great job of exploring Han Solo's backstory. The action scenes are top - notch, especially the space chases. The characters are well - developed, with Alden Ehrenreich bringing a fresh take on Han Solo. However, some might find the plot a bit convoluted at times.
He might have said the plot's non - linearity was both engaging and confusing in a good way. It made the audience pay close attention.
I don't have the exact review to summarize. But it could be that he summarized it as a heartwarming Christmas tale with great characters.