Well, a 'list of fact or fiction' might be reliable in some cases. For example, if it's created by a trusted authority in a particular field, like a scientific institution for a list related to scientific facts or fictions. However, there could be biases or inaccuracies. Maybe the person or group making the list has an agenda. So, it's not always a sure - fire reliable source.
It depends. If it's a well - researched and verified list, it can be reliable. But if it's just some random compilation without proper fact - checking, it may not be.
Yes. 'Fargo Fact or Fiction' can be a reliable source. It likely has a process of fact - checking. If it's a well - known and respected platform, it should be reliable.
Well, without knowing more about 'Frakes Fact or Fiction', it's hard to say. Generally, for a source to be reliable, it should have clear editorial standards, cite its sources, and be free from bias. If 'Frakes Fact or Fiction' meets these criteria, it could be considered reliable. However, if it's just some random website or publication with no such quality control, then it probably isn't.
Yes, it can be. 'Food Fact or Fiction' often does research and presents evidence - based information. However, like any source, it's always good to cross - check facts.
Yes. 'mtg fact or fiction' can be a reliable source. It often presents accurate facts about Magic: The Gathering, like card mechanics and tournament rules. However, it's always good to cross - check with official Wizards of the Coast resources.
It depends. Some parts of it might be based on scientific facts while others could be fictional for the sake of entertainment. For example, the general appearance of some dinosaurs might be based on fossil evidence, but their behaviors in the show could be exaggerated.
Well, it depends. Some parts of it might be reliable, but some could be just speculation. There are many shows or books with this title, and not all are based on solid scientific evidence.
It could be either. Some sources claiming 'diabetes free' might be based on facts like proper diet and exercise can help manage and potentially prevent diabetes in some cases. But it might also be fiction if it makes exaggerated claims. For example, if it says a single magic pill can make you diabetes - free without any lifestyle changes, that's likely fiction.
Truth is usually a reliable source as it's based on facts. Fiction, on the other hand, isn't reliable for factual information since it's made-up.
Since I don't know the contents of the 'fact or fiction green book', I can't say for sure if it's reliable.
It depends. Some books labeled as such might be full of conspiracy theories and lack solid evidence, so not very reliable. However, if it's a well - researched academic or journalistic work, it could be more trustworthy.