Well, Roger Ebert likely pointed out how Quentin Tarantino's writing in Pulp Fiction was so sharp and full of dark humor. The dialogue was so well - crafted that it made the characters come alive in a very vivid way. He may have commented on how the movie was a game - changer in terms of independent filmmaking at the time, with its edgy style and mix of different genres. It was a movie that didn't follow the traditional Hollywood formula and yet managed to capture a huge audience. The way it played with time and told different stories that all connected in the end was a big part of what made it so special, and Ebert would surely have had something to say about that.
Roger Ebert might have focused on the cultural impact of Pulp Fiction. He could have noted how it influenced other filmmakers and became a cult classic. He may have also talked about the cinematography, how the visuals added to the overall mood of the film, whether it was the seedy underbelly of Los Angeles or the more stylized scenes. And he might have analyzed the characters' moral ambiguity, which was one of the things that made the movie so thought - provoking.
Ebert probably praised the unique non - linear narrative structure of 'Pulp Fiction'. It made the movie engaging and different from traditional storytelling.
Ebert might have praised the non - linear storytelling in Pulp Fiction. He could have mentioned how the movie's unique plot structure keeps the audience engaged throughout.
Roger Ebert thought that Pulp Fiction was a brilliant and innovative film. He praised its non - linear storytelling which added a unique and engaging element to the movie.
In his review, Roger Ebert lauded Pulp Fiction for being a game - changer. He pointed out that it had a fresh take on the crime genre. The non - linear storytelling made the audience pay closer attention and get more involved. He also liked the fact that the movie had a great deal of replay value as new things could be noticed with each viewing.
He reviewed it positively. He might have been impressed by the movie's creativity.
He might have said the plot's non - linearity was both engaging and confusing in a good way. It made the audience pay close attention.
I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read his exact review. But generally, he might have talked about the charm of the story, the characters like Ralphie, and how it captures the essence of Christmas for a young boy.
He might have praised the actors. The performances in Pulp Fiction are top - notch. The actors really brought the characters to life.
Roger Ebert thought highly of Pulp Fiction. He praised its unique narrative structure, which was non - linear and engaging. The movie's blend of different storylines and characters was something he found very interesting.
He might have said that the characters are very well - developed.