It goes against the principle of full disclosure. When we tell a story, we should strive to provide all the relevant information. A name is often a relevant piece of information. It can influence how we perceive the actions and motives in the story. If it's withheld, it's like presenting an incomplete picture to the audience.
One argument is that withholding a name can create a sense of mystery that may be misinterpreted as dishonesty. Readers might feel like they're being deprived of important information. For example, in a news story, if a key person's name is withheld, it can make the public question the credibility of the whole report.
Some people argue that graphic novels are a passing fad. They don't think they'll stand the test of time like traditional books. However, the popularity of graphic novels has been growing steadily over the years and they've become an important part of the literary world.
Yes, one strong argument is that it can be a distraction from real - life issues. For instance, if someone is constantly immersed in fictional worlds, they might neglect important things like personal relationships or career - building.
One reason against science fiction could be that it's often seen as too far - fetched. Some people think that the concepts like time travel or alien invasions are completely unrealistic and have no basis in real life, so they consider it a waste of time to engage with such stories.
One argument against reading fiction is that it's seen as a waste of time. Some people think that time could be better spent on non - fictional works like self - help books or educational textbooks that directly contribute to knowledge acquisition or career development.
One argument against graphic novels is that some people consider them to be less literary. They think that the heavy use of pictures detracts from the written word and the development of complex language skills. For example, in a traditional novel, readers have to visualize the scenes and characters solely based on the text, which is seen as a more 'intellectual' exercise.
Some people might be against graphic novels because they think they are not 'true literature'. However, this view is quite narrow. Graphic novels can tell complex stories with a combination of images and text, often reaching audiences who may not be drawn to traditional novels.
The fact that animals have their own rights is a significant argument against animal testing. Just like humans, they should not be used as mere tools for scientific experiments. Also, alternative methods such as in - vitro testing and computer simulations are becoming more advanced and can potentially replace animal testing.
Authors against fanfiction may argue that it can interfere with their ability to monetize their work. If a lot of fanfiction is out there for free, it could potentially reduce the market for official spin - offs or sequels. Also, they might worry about the quality control. Fanfiction varies widely in quality and an association with low - quality fan works could potentially harm an author's reputation.
Others might say that the idea of Jesus as a divine being is a human construct used for social and political control. They look at how the early Christian church developed and spread, and see the elevation of Jesus to a God - like status as a way to gain power and influence. For instance, by making Jesus the central figure of a new religion, the church leaders could impose certain moral and social codes on people.