Well, 'fan fiction based on fan fiction' means creating a new piece of fan - created writing that uses the elements from another fan - made story. This can happen in various fandoms. Say in a book - based fandom, one fan writes a story about a side character, and then another fan reads that and gets inspired to write a story that continues or reimagines the story of that side character from the first fan fiction. It's a way to expand the fan - created universe even further.
No, it's not. Fan fiction can be a creative and engaging form of expression for people of all ages.
This kind of fan fiction concept is quite controversial. In the original 'Harry Potter' series, Severus Snape and Hermione Granger have a significant age gap and different personalities. However, in fan fiction, it might explore a different kind of relationship. It could be a way for authors to break the boundaries of the original story and create unique scenarios. But it also challenges the traditional view of the characters. Some might see it as an interesting exploration of 'what if' scenarios, while others might be put off by the deviation from the original character dynamics.
No, it's not entirely new. Fan fiction has always been a way for fans to play with and expand on existing fictional universes. The concept of thoughtcrimes has also been explored in literature and media for a long time. When these two ideas combine in the form of 'thoughtcrimes fan fiction', it's just a new way of looking at an old practice of fan - based creativity. For instance, in classic dystopian novels, there were elements similar to thoughtcrimes, and fans may have been writing related fan fiction for years without using this exact term.
Yes. One challenge is getting permission. Since it's based on someone else's fan work, you need to make sure the original fan fiction author is okay with it. Another is consistency. You have to be true to the concepts and characters from the original fan fiction while also adding your own twist. For example, if the first fan fiction established a certain character trait, you can't just change it randomly in your new fan fiction based on it.
Twilight originated as an original concept by the author and not from a fan fiction. The story and characters were developed specifically for this work without drawing inspiration from fan-created content.
Fan fiction typically builds upon popular franchises. This could be anything from classic novels to contemporary blockbusters. It gives fans the chance to explore what might have happened differently or to focus on minor characters and their backstories.
Yes, it is quite popular in some corners of the fan fiction community. The idea of Harry and Voldemort being soulmates offers a very unique and complex take on their relationship. It goes against the traditional view of them as arch - enemies and explores a much deeper, more psychological connection between them.
Well, 'inheritance slash fan fiction' combines two elements. 'Inheritance' could be about inheriting something like a power, a throne, or a legacy in a story. Fan fiction writers then add the 'slash' aspect. For example, if 'Inheritance' has characters A and B, in the slash fan fiction, there could be a story where A and B have a romantic relationship that wasn't in the original 'Inheritance' story. It's a way for fans to explore different relationships and scenarios within the 'Inheritance' universe.
No, Wallbanger wasn't based on Twilight fan fiction. It has its own unique plot and story elements.
Hard to say. It depends on various factors and the creator's inspiration. Maybe some elements could be similar to fan fiction, but it's not definite.