Ian Bogost believes 'Games are better without stories'. Do you agree? Why or why not?
I don't agree. Stories add depth and emotional connection to games. For example, in 'The Last of Us', the story of Joel and Ellie's journey through a post - apocalyptic world makes the gameplay more meaningful. It gives players a reason to keep going, to protect Ellie, and to face the various challenges. The story enriches the overall experience and makes it more than just a series of tasks.
I'm on the fence. While in some cases, like in many arcade - style games, a lack of story can enhance the pure gameplay experience. However, in role - playing games, stories are crucial. In 'Final Fantasy' series, the complex and engaging stories are what draw players in. They create a world that players want to explore and be a part of. So it really depends on the type of game and the target audience.
I agree. Some games can be better without stories. Take 'Flappy Bird' for instance. It's a simple game where you just try to keep the bird flying through the pipes. There's no story, but it's highly addictive. The focus is solely on the gameplay mechanics, and it doesn't need a story to be engaging. It shows that games can be successful and enjoyable without the added layer of a story.
Ian Bogost claims 'Games are better without stories'. What are the possible reasons for this statement?
Another aspect could be that some players might find stories in games to be a distraction. They might be more interested in the strategic or skill - based aspects of the game. For example, in a competitive multiplayer game like Counter - Strike, players are mainly focused on their shooting skills, teamwork, and strategies. A story in this context might not add much value and could even take away from the intense, fast - paced action. Games without stories can be more about the moment - to - moment gameplay and the interaction with the game's systems, which can be a more appealing experience for certain types of gamers.
Do you agree that games are better without stories?
Yes, I do. Some games focus on pure gameplay mechanics like Tetris. The simplicity of just arranging blocks without a story is very engaging. It allows players to fully concentrate on the task at hand, improving their skills and reflexes without the distraction of a narrative.
Do You Agree That Far Cry Games Would Be Better Without a Story?
Yes. The open - world nature of Far Cry games is already very appealing. Without a story, it could be more like a virtual playground where players can do whatever they want, whenever they want, without having to follow a linear plot.
Why do Bethesda games need better main stories?
Well, one reason is that often the main stories can be a bit convoluted. They start off strong but then get lost in side quests and open - world distractions. For example, in some of their RPGs, the main plotline seems to take a backseat to all the other things you can do in the game world.
Why do you have to agree with Persona 5 beginning fiction?
You might have to agree with the Persona 5 beginning fiction because it establishes the world, rules, and initial conflicts that shape the rest of the story. Sometimes, it gives you an initial impression that influences your perception of the entire fictional universe.
Barry Diller stated 'There is no future in science fiction'. Do you agree with him? Why or why not?
I completely disagree. Science fiction is not just about entertainment. It's a genre that encourages us to think outside the box and dream big. It has the power to shape our future by inspiring new ideas and inventions. Moreover, new generations are constantly getting interested in science fiction, whether it's through the latest superhero movies or classic sci - fi novels. So, it has a lot of potential for growth and development in the future.
Do you agree that mario games have no story?
I don't really agree. Mario games do have a story, albeit a simple one. Mario is often on a quest to rescue Princess Peach from the villain Bowser. There are also different worlds and levels that he has to traverse through, which are part of the overall story arc. The story might not be as complex as some other games, but it's still there.
Do you agree that games don't need story?
Well, in my opinion, it depends on the type of game. Arcade games often don't need a story. They are designed for quick, repetitive gameplay. But for role - playing games or adventure games, a story is usually crucial. However, for games like simple mobile casual games that are meant to be played in short bursts, a story may not be necessary at all. These games are more about instant fun and distraction from daily routines.
Why do fighting games have terrible stories?
One reason could be that coming up with a great story for a fighting game is challenging. There's a lot of pressure to make the combat exciting, and sometimes the story gets overlooked. Another factor could be that developers assume players are mainly there for the fights and don't invest much in a complex story.
Why do Bethesda games have bad stories?
Could be that Bethesda games prioritize the sandbox experience and exploration, leaving the story aspect less refined. Or perhaps they struggle to balance multiple storylines and characters effectively.