Our limited human experience. We are bound by a finite lifespan and a finite view of the universe. Forever time is beyond our scope, so knowledge of it is more like fiction. It's like trying to describe a color we've never seen.
The fact that forever time defies our normal understanding of time. Time as we know it is measured and has boundaries in our daily lives. But forever time has no such boundaries. Since we can't really grasp it in a practical sense, any knowledge associated with it is more fictional. For example, we can't conduct experiments to prove things about forever time, so it remains in the realm of speculation and fiction.
Lack of evidence. We have no real proof of what forever time would be like, so knowledge about it is fictional.
Yes. Forever time is an abstract concept that is difficult to define or measure in reality. Knowledge about it often involves a lot of speculation and imagination, so it can be considered fictional to some extent.
It's fiction because it was created by Shakespeare. He made up the story.
A fiction can be deemed fantastic when it offers a break from reality. It could have time travel, supernatural abilities, or complex fantasy systems. The key is to transport the reader to a place where the impossible becomes possible and keeps them engaged and enthralled.
A dangerous fiction might have extreme violence, false information that can mislead people, or ideas that go against moral and ethical standards. These elements can make it dangerous.
Well, a fiction can be deemed fatal when it has elements like a global catastrophe that has no hope of being resolved or when the protagonist's actions result in their own downfall with no way out. Also, if the story ends in a way that completely destroys the values and beliefs it initially presented, that could make it fatal.
It could be when the plot or characters have extreme and morally questionable actions without any redemption or consequence.
Not really. Although historical fiction can introduce readers to different historical periods and settings, it is mainly for entertainment purposes. The authors might take creative liberties to make the story more interesting, so it can't be fully trusted as a historical source. For example, a historical fiction novel might change the sequence of real events to fit the plot.
Shallow character development is another sign. In junk fiction, characters might be one - dimensional, only existing to move the plot forward. Take some action - packed but poorly written novels where the hero is just a tough guy with no real emotional depth or growth throughout the story. Moreover, if the writing is full of errors and the language is not well - crafted, it's likely to be junk fiction as well. However, we should also remember that the definition of junk fiction can be subjective, and some works that seem like junk at first might have hidden value upon closer inspection.
Well, the whole concept of memory transfer in 'The Giver' is very science - fictional. It's not something that exists in our current world, and it's used to explore deep themes like knowledge, freedom, and the human experience, which is a common approach in science fiction.
Limetown is fiction because it involves fictional characters and a made - up town with a fictional mystery. There's no real - life Limetown with such events.