Well, it's kind of a mixed bag. The comic might have great characters but a weak storyline, or vice versa. So, it can be good or suck depending on what aspects you focus on.
It's hard to say. Some comics are amazing with detailed illustrations and exciting adventures, but others might lack depth or originality. It all comes down to personal preferences.
The Marmaduke comic could suck due to a variety of reasons. Maybe the humor is outdated, the art style isn't appealing, or the storylines are too repetitive.
Maybe it has a weak plot or poor character development. That could be why people think it sucks.
CGC might mention if a comic is a newsstand edition, but it depends on various factors such as the availability of clear indicators and the specific criteria for assessment.
A direct edition comic book is typically a special version that is released without going through traditional distribution channels. It often has better print quality and maybe some exclusive content.
In comic books, a 'direct edition' usually refers to a version that's sold directly to comic book stores or specialty retailers without going through traditional distribution channels. It might have some special features or be more collector-friendly.
A direct edition in comic books typically refers to a version that's sold directly to comic book stores and specialty shops, bypassing the traditional distribution channels.
It sucks because you get so invested in the characters and the plot that you don't want to say goodbye. You want the adventure to continue.
It's hard to say. Maybe some people don't like it, but others might find it interesting. A lot depends on personal preferences and expectations.
Well, it could be that some people find the content too explicit or lacking in depth. Maybe the storylines are weak or the characters aren't well-developed.
I think the reason could be that the plotlines in some science fiction works are confusing or lack depth. Also, the special effects might not always live up to expectations.