I think Salinger ended the novel that way to challenge conventional storytelling and force readers to think beyond the obvious. It might also be related to his personal style and the themes he wanted to convey throughout the book.
It could be that Chekhov wanted to create a certain impact or leave the readers with a lasting impression. Maybe it was his way of adding an element of surprise or mystery.
Orwell could have ended the novel that way to challenge conventional storytelling or to force the readers to question certain ideas. Maybe he wanted to spark discussions and interpretations.
Yeah, it did. I think the author laid out the clues throughout the story that pointed to this conclusion. The character developments and plot progressions made it logical.
The ending might involve the samurai sacrificing themselves for a greater cause. This could show their ultimate loyalty and honor. Or, they could retire and pass on their wisdom to the next generation.
Not really. The ending was quite a surprise and not at all what I had envisioned.
He weeps because of the trauma and disillusionment. The events of the novel have stripped away his childhood naivety and left him emotionally exhausted and heartbroken.
Maybe it's to give readers a pleasant and heartwarming feeling throughout the entire story.
The ending of '13 Reasons Why' is quite complex. It involves a series of events and resolutions for the main characters, but I don't want to spoil it for you.
It could be because he realizes the loss of innocence and the harshness of the world he's been through.
Well, Ralph cries due to multiple reasons. The chaos and violence he witnessed, the failure to maintain order, and the disillusionment with human nature all contribute to his breakdown.