It's hard to predict exactly. So many factors could influence the outcome.
The first BuzzFeed Trump - Russia story was mainly about alleged connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. It claimed there were various improper interactions. However, this story was highly controversial as some of the information was unsubstantiated at the time, leading to a lot of debate about the reliability of the media reporting in such politically charged situations.
It was The New York Times that initially broke the story.
It's hard to predict exactly how it ends. Politics is full of surprises and can change in unexpected ways.
The first BuzzFeed Trump - Russia story had a profound impact on the political climate. It was like a stone thrown into a pond, creating ripples that spread far and wide. Politicians on both sides of the aisle had to take a stance. Trump's team had to constantly defend against the implications of the story. It led to a greater focus on issues of foreign interference in US elections. The public was also more divided, with some believing every word of the story and others dismissing it completely. This division spilled over into other aspects of the political discourse, making it even more difficult to find common ground on various issues.
Some say it's about geopolitical interests, but that's a complex issue.
It's hard to say for sure. Some stories might be based on speculation or misinformation, while others could have some elements of truth. It depends on the specific details and sources.
The 'New York Times Feb 15 Trump Russia Story' is likely to be a complex narrative. It could involve investigations into whether there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia in the 2016 election. There might be details about meetings, communications, or financial transactions between Trump associates and Russian entities. It could also explore how this alleged relationship affected US - Russia relations during Trump's presidency, such as in areas like international security, trade, and diplomatic negotiations.
It's not common in everyday conversation. It seems more like a slogan - like statement that those closely following Trump or his policies might use to emphasize his importance or the finality of his actions in a particular context.
It could have had a political impact. It might have influenced public perception of Trump and his relationship with Russia, either positively or negatively depending on one's political stance.
It could imply that Trump is the final or conclusive factor in a situation. For example, in a political discussion about a certain policy change, if someone says 'trump end of story', they might be suggesting that Trump's stance or action on it is the ultimate determinant, without any further debate.