Most of Stephen King's works are fiction. He's famous for his horror and thriller novels that are often based on fictional stories and characters.
Stephen King is mostly associated with fiction. His extensive body of work includes tales of horror, suspense, and fantasy that are creations of his imagination. While he could have ventured into non-fiction on rare occasions, the majority of his output is firmly in the fiction realm.
No, it's not. Stephen King is known for various genres like horror and thriller, but not typically for science fiction.
Stephen King is often regarded as the king of fiction. His vast body of work, spanning various genres and captivating millions of readers, justifies this title. His ability to create suspense and memorable characters is remarkable.
Yes, it could be. Stephen King is well-known for his works of fiction.
The movie 'The Woman King' is based on historical events but also contains fictional elements. So, it can be considered a fictionalized account of history.
King Arthur is mostly considered fiction. There are many elements in the King Arthur stories that are clearly fictional, such as the magic sword Excalibur, the wizard Merlin, and the Lady of the Lake. These elements are part of the rich tapestry of Arthurian legend that has been passed down through the ages in literature and oral tradition.
Stephen King's 'It' is typically classified as horror rather than science fiction. It focuses on supernatural elements and the terror they bring rather than scientific concepts or technological advancements.
No, it's not. 'It' is more of a horror story rather than science fiction.
Stephen King is not primarily known as a science fiction writer. He's more renowned for his horror and thriller works.
Definitely not. Bridgerton is fictional. It creates a fictional world with fictional characters and storylines for entertainment purposes.
It depends. Sometimes a work labeled 'Smile' could be non-fiction, but it's not always the case. You'd need more context to be sure.