I don't think it's necessary. Usually, underlining isn't a common way to mark a collection of short stories.
It depends. Usually, you don't have to underline short stories. But if it's for a specific style guide or assignment instructions that say so, then yes.
Typically, you quote short stories. Underlining is not a common way to indicate them.
It depends. Usually, italicizing is more common for titles of short stories. But in some cases, underlining can also be used, especially in handwritten work.
It depends. Usually, you quote short stories when referring to specific passages or quotes within the story. Underlining is less common in this context.
Most of the time, short stories are italicized. It's a standard practice that helps distinguish the title from the main text. But there can be exceptions based on the requirements of a particular publication or writing guideline.
It depends. Usually, italicizing is more common for titles of short stories.
Typically, you quote short stories. Underlining is not the standard way. Quotes help clearly indicate that you're referring to the specific story. However, in some specific formatting styles or instructions, underlining might be specified.
It depends. Usually, you don't have to underline short stories. But if it's for a specific style guide or assignment that requires it, then yes.
No, we usually don't underline short stories. It's not a common practice.
You shouldn't underline short stories when using MLA format. The convention is to use italics for titles like these. It's a standard rule followed in many academic and literary contexts.