Yes, they can. Copying someone else's story structure without permission can be considered copyright infringement, and the original creator can sue.
Imitating the structure of a novel to write a novel was not necessarily plagiarism. plagiarism refers to the use of another person's work, creativity, or structure to express one's own work without authorization. In this case, the author may directly copy or borrow elements or structures from other people's works and use them in his own work. However, if the author merely borrowed the structure or elements of another person's work without directly copying or borrowing the content or creativity, it did not necessarily constitute plagiarism. In this case, the author could construct his own work according to his own creativity and inspiration, and add his own thoughts and style to it. Therefore, copying the structure of a novel was not considered plagiarism as long as it followed the appropriate copyright law and expressed its creativity and style in its own work.
Yes, a reporter can be sued for a story. If the story has false information that harms someone's reputation, they can be sued for libel or slander. For example, if a reporter writes that a business owner is involved in illegal activities without any proof, the business owner may take legal action.
Imitating someone else's novel was not considered plagiarism. Imitation is a common way of writing in literature, and it can help. However, if the imitated work was exactly the same as the original author's work, or if the plot, characters, theme, etc. were exactly the same, it might be considered plagiarism. Although imitating other people's novels could be an effective way of writing, plagiarism should be avoided. Not only would it harm the rights of the original author, but it would also negatively affect the readers 'senses. Therefore, plagiarism was avoided.
Whether plagiarizing 100,000 words of another person's work or not could be considered a legal act of "plagiarism", it could be regarded as an act of copyright violation. Whether it was illegal or not depended on the actual situation. According to China's "copyright law" and other relevant laws and regulations, the copyright enjoyed by the copyright owner includes personal rights and property rights. Personal rights include the right to copy, distribution, exhibition, and so on, while property rights include copyright, royalties, adaptation rights, and so on. If you copy, distribute, exhibit, or perform another person's work without the authorization of the copyright owner (that is, violating the "right of reproduction" in the copyright), or adapt, translate, adapt, translate, edit, organize the work of another person (that is, violating the "right of adaptation","right of translation","right of editing" in the copyright), or violate the copyright of another person's work in other ways (that is, violating the "usage fee" in the copyright), it will constitute an act of copyright violation. The act of plagiarizing another person's work may not necessarily be considered as a "plagiarism" in the law, but regardless of whether it constituted plagiarism or not, it may be regarded as an act of violating the copyright of another person's work, and such an act is likely to be punished by the law. Therefore, if you plagiarized someone else's work of 100,000 words, regardless of whether it constituted legal "plagiarism", it may be regarded as a kind of copyright violation and you need to bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
Yes, in some cases. If the media has a legal obligation to report a story, such as under a contract or in certain situations where there is a public interest at stake, and they unjustly deny it, legal action may be possible. For example, if a journalist has promised to cover a story based on an agreement with you and then backs out without a valid reason, it could potentially be a breach of contract. However, the media also has editorial discretion, and they may choose not to run a story for various legitimate reasons like lack of newsworthiness or insufficient evidence.
It depends. If the story you are sharing is your own original creation and doesn't violate anyone's rights, then no, you probably won't get sued. However, if it involves defamation, which means you are spreading false information that harms someone's reputation, or if it's a trade secret that you are revealing, then you are at risk of being sued.
There's a chance you could get sued for sharing a story. It mainly hinges on whether the story is protected by law and if your sharing violates those protections.
It's possible, but it depends on a lot of factors. Like if there was a legal agreement or if your rights were violated in some way.
Yes, fiction can potentially be sued for libel if it contains false statements that harm someone's reputation.
Well, it's not an easy call. You need to look at things like if the main ideas, character developments, and key events are too close to another work. If there are just a few similarities, it might not be copying, but if there are many, it could be a problem.