For non-profit purposes, would it be a violation of copyright if a copyright-protected work was read aloud and disseminated?
The act of reading and spreading a copyrighteously written work for non-profit purposes does not necessarily constitute an act of copyright violation. According to the copyright law, reading, translating, adapting, performing, and spreading copyright-protected works required the authorization of the copyright owner. If the work is read aloud or transmitted without the permission of the copyright owner, it may constitute an copyright violation. However, if it is for non-profit purposes, that is, not for commercial purposes or personal interests, but for personal hobbies or public welfare purposes, it is legal to read and spread copyrighteously. In this case, the reader does not need to obtain the copyright owner's permission because his actions are not considered an act of copyright violation. It should be noted that even if it is for non-profit purposes, if the works are read aloud or disseminated, it may still damage the legal rights and interests of the copyright owner if it violates the intellectual property rights of the copyright owner. Therefore, it was best to obtain the explicit permission of the copyright owner when reading a copyright-bound work to avoid possible legal risks.
Non-copyright protected object
According to the copyright law, the creation of a work itself is not protected as long as the work conforms to the provisions of the copyright law. His works include: 1. Works in the fields of literature, art, and science, such as poetry, prose, novels, plays, movies, music, fine arts, photography, sculpture, architecture, etc.; 2. Computer software, network information, and other digitized works. Therefore, the objects that are not protected by copyright include: 1. Natural language expressions such as spoken language, written language, idioms, proverb, etc. 2. Music works can be protected by copyright as long as their expression is digitized; 3. Computer programs, algorithms, and other mathematical results; 4. Other works that do not require copyright protection, such as scripts, novel plots, etc.
Are works that are prohibited from being published or disseminated in China protected by the copyright law?
The scope of protection of China's copyright law includes: 1 Music 2 Film works and works created in a similar way to film production 3 Photographic Works 4. Engineering design drawings, product design drawings, maps, schematics, and other visual works 5. Other circumstances that may be regarded as works as stipulated by laws and administrative regulations. Therefore, works that are prohibited from being published and disseminated in China are not protected by the "copyright law" if they meet any of the above types of works. For example, the laws and regulations that prohibit publication and transmission include, but are not limited to, the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors, the Labor Law of the People's Republic of China, and the Anti-terrorism Law of the People's Republic of China.
Without permission, reprinting someone else's article for non-profit purposes without identifying the original author was considered copyright violation?
Generally speaking, reprinting someone else's article for non-profit purposes without permission and without indicating the original author was considered copyright violation. This was because, according to the provisions of the " copyright law," no one was allowed to copy, distribute, rent, display, perform, show, broadcast, or spread the works of others without authorization. Reprinting someone else's article for non-profit purposes generally wouldn't violate the author's copyright, but if it was used for commercial or profit-making purposes, it would be regarded as copyright violation. In addition, if the original author was not identified, it would be considered as violating the author's copyright. This was because the copyright law stipulated that authors had the right to protect their intellectual property rights, including copyrights and trademark rights. If the original author was not identified, it would be regarded as violating the author's intellectual property rights, which could lead to other serious consequences such as legal responsibility, compensation, etc. Therefore, in order to avoid any form of copyright violation, it is recommended that you must obtain the author's permission or indicate the source and respect the author's intellectual property rights when reprinting other people's articles.
It was a non-profit re-creation, but with the purpose of gaining fame, was there any legal copyright for a doujinshi work created in this way? Or legal copyright?
Non-profit second creations referred to creations based on the original work, not pursuing commercial interests, but only for personal interests, hobbies, or creative inspiration. However, copyright issues might be involved if he made a non-profit re-creation for the purpose of gaining fame. According to the relevant laws and regulations, if a doujinshi work is original and has not been authorized by the original owner, the copyright of the doujinshi work belongs to the creator himself. However, if a doujinshi work has a certain impact, that is, it is widely distributed, shared, or used, the owner of the original work may think that it has been violated and may sue the creator for copyright violation. Therefore, it is recommended to understand the relevant laws and regulations first and avoid violating the copyright of the original work as much as possible when doing non-profit second creations. At the same time, he could also expand his influence and increase his popularity through legal channels such as publishing on forums and social media.
What kind of work was published on the Internet? Was it protected by copyright?
If you publish your own works on the Internet, be it novels, essays, poems, comics, music, videos, etc., as long as these works exist on the Internet and are accessed, shared, or disseminated by others, they will be protected by copyright. The term of copyright protection was 50 years after the author's death, but if the copyright owner's permission was obtained before the author's death, the copyright could be extended. Therefore, if one wanted to publish a work on the Internet, one had to first determine whether the copyright of the work had expired or whether it had been obtained by others to avoid violating the rights of others. Even if the works have not obtained the permission of the copyright owner, if these works are publicly published, distributed or shared on the Internet, copyright disputes will arise. Therefore, in order to avoid unnecessary trouble, it is recommended to consult the copyright owner before publishing the work and abide by relevant laws and regulations.
Would doujinshi or manga be considered copyright violation?
Doujinshi or manga, if the inspiration for the creation comes from the original work and it is a new creation, including the characters, plot, worldview, etc., it may be regarded as an violation of the copyright of the original work. This was because copyright protected the author's imagination and creativity. If a work of art or manga was merely an imitation or adaptation of the original work and added its own elements, it would not be considered a copyright violation. However, this situation could also change due to the revision and change of the law. At present, the standards for determining whether works of the same genre or manga violated copyright were also different in different countries. Therefore, when creating works such as doujinshi or manga, you need to carefully understand the local laws and regulations to avoid being deemed as copyright violation.
Would it be an copyright violation to make a song into a novel?
Changing a song into a novel involves copyright issues. If a song is adapted into a novel without the authorization of the copyright owner and published publicly, it may constitute an act of copyright violation. When writing a novel, you should respect the intellectual property rights of the copyright owners of the songs and not violate their copyrights. If a song was used as material for a novel, it should be approved by the copyright owner of the song or the copyright information of the song should be indicated when using it. If you plan to adapt a song into a novel and publish it publicly, it's best to consult the copyright owner first to ensure that the action is legal.
Would doujin novels be considered as an copyright violation?
Doujin novels were usually based on the storyline, characters, and scenes of other works (such as comics, novels, games, etc.). Doujinshi novels may be considered as copycat works under certain circumstances. There were two main aspects of copyright and intellectual property in Doujin novels. If a doujin novel is based on a copyright-protected work, then it may be considered an copyright violation. On the other hand, if a doujinshi novel uses creative ideas or elements that are protected by intellectual property rights in the creation process, it may also constitute an copyright violation. There were many factors to consider when determining whether a doujin novel was an copyright violation, such as the source of the work, the similarity of the storyline, the similarity of creativity or elements, and so on. In addition, the laws of different regions or countries may also be different, so the specific situation needs to be analyzed in detail. Although Doujinshi novels could protect the intellectual property rights of the authors to a certain extent, the problem of copyright violation still existed in practice. Therefore, when writing Doujinshi novels, it is recommended to follow the relevant laws and regulations to avoid copyright violation.
In the Name of the People was sued for copyright violation. Why was it that every popular TV series would be sued for copyright violation?
In the Name of the People was a Chinese TV series that debuted in 2017. It was popular because of its profound anti-corruption drama and outstanding cast. However, the production process of the TV series caused some controversy, including the issue of copyright. In fact, every popular TV series could be involved in copyright litigation because the producer might violate the copyright of other companies during the production process. In the Name of the People was no exception. Its production company, China Vision Media, was awarded 1 million yuan in 2019 for violating the copyright of Zhou Meisen, the original author of In the Name of the People. In addition to copyright violation, the producers of TV series might also be involved in copyright violation in terms of editing, soundtracks, special effects, and so on. Therefore, producers needed to ensure that the works they produced complied with the requirements of copyright law in order to avoid the occurrence of copyright litigation. Although every TV series involved copyright issues, it was not unique to In the Name of the People. In order to avoid copyright issues, the producers had to strictly abide by the requirements of the copyright law during the production process to ensure that their works met the legal requirements.
Would copying and selling a calligraphy work violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy work? If it was a violation, which article of the copyright law would it violate? what is the basis
The copying and selling of calligraphy works may violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works. The specific violation of the copyright law needs to be judged according to the specific circumstances. According to the third paragraph of article 10 of the copyright law, the right to reproduce a copy belongs to the author. Without the permission of the author, no one can create or publish a copy. If he copied the calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's right to copy. According to the first paragraph of article 2 of the copyright law, the creation of works, including modification, adaptation, translation, compilation, suppression, etc., should be negotiated and approved. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can do this. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. According to the first paragraph of article 21 of the copyright law, the use of works by means of reproduction, distribution, rental, exhibition, performance, screening, broadcasting, information network transmission, etc. shall be negotiated and permitted. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one shall carry out this act. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. Whether copying calligraphy works and selling them violates the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works requires specific analysis. If any of the rights in the copyright are violated, it may constitute a copyright violation.