Red Fox Scholar's Douban rating was too low, so why did the netizens recommend it instead?
'Red Fox Scholar' was an online literary work created in 2016. The work told a fantasy story with a scholar as the protagonist, which involved many elements of myths and legends. Douban's low rating may be due to some users posting low-quality comments before the rating. These comments may affect the accuracy of the entire rating system. However, even though Douban's rating system was flawed, Red Fox Scholar was still widely praised by some netizens, so there might be a drop in ratings but an increase in user recommendations. The readers 'comments and recommendations would also have a certain impact on the overall quality of the work. If the readers thought that the plot, character creation, writing, and other aspects of the work were outstanding, they might give the work a higher score. On the contrary, if readers thought that the work had some flaws, they might give a lower rating.
Why was the Douban rating of 'Shanghai Fortress' so low?
The main reason why 'Shanghai Fortress' had a low Douban rating was that its performance in the market was not as good as expected. The novel was set in a futuristic world, where an Earthling and an alien lived. Although this story had a high literary value, after it was adapted into a movie, the plot was too complicated and lacked attractive special effects and visual effects. As a result, the audience's reputation was not good, and the Douban rating was affected accordingly. In addition, some plots of the novel have also caused controversy, such as the relationship between humans and aliens and the ethics of science and technology, which may also affect Douban's rating.
Flying Life 2's Douban rating is so low
The Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was not low. According to the information in document [1] and document [6], the Douban score of Flying Life 2 was 8.1. Although the document [1] mentioned that the initial score was as high as 8.2, it had now dropped to 7.9, but this did not mean that the score was low. In addition, according to the document [7], the Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was 8.1, and 94% of the audience thought it was better than the average rating of the comedy. Therefore, the Douban rating of Flying Life 2 was not low.
Flying Life's Douban rating is so low
It could be seen that the performance of "Flying Life" on Douban was not low. According to the information in document [5], the movie's Douban score was 6.9, which was better than 84% of comedy films. Although the score was not particularly high, it was not considered low either. In addition, the document [4] also mentioned that Douban's rating of 7.0 was not low. Han Han's movie had people who liked it and people who didn't, so the rating was relatively fair. Therefore, it could be said that the Douban rating of " Flying Life " was not low.
Is the Douban rating of Flying Life so low?
It could be seen that the rating of Flying Life on Douban was 6.9, which could be said to be relatively low. However, the rating was only a reference indicator. It could be affected by the number of fans and the crowd effect. Some celebrities 'movies were generally rated higher because they had a huge fan base. Therefore, even though the rating of " Flying Life " was low, it didn't mean that it was a bad movie. The ratings were only the audience's personal opinions on the movie. Everyone's preferences were different, so the ratings might vary.
"Unrequited Love for Orange Born in Huainan" had a Douban rating of 5.3. Why was this drama's rating so low?
" Unrequited Love for Orange Born in Huainan " was an online novel written by August Chang 'an. It was about the love story between a high school girl, Luo Zhi, and a boy, Sheng Huainan. After the drama was broadcast in mainland China, it received widespread attention and love from the audience. However, the Douban rating of the drama was only 53, which caused a heated discussion. As far as I know, the main reasons for the low ratings of the play are as follows: 1. The plot rating is not high: the plot of the play is relatively dull, lacking surprise and tension. Moreover, the plot turns and the relationship between the characters are not handled properly, which is easy to cause dissatisfaction and disappointment among the audience. 2. The character image is not well portrayed: Although the play tells an emotional story, the character image is not deeply portrayed. Some characters 'personalities and characteristics are too superficial and exaggerated, lacking realism and three-dimensional sense. 3. The production quality is not high: the quality of the play and special effects are not good enough, making the audience feel a little rough and not delicate when watching. In addition, there were some flaws in the music and sound effects of the play. All of these reasons caused the rating of " Unrequited Love for Tangerines Born in Huainan " to be limited. However, as an online novel, its storyline and character image were still of a high standard, worthy of the audience's attention and love.
Flying Life's Douban rating is low
[The rating of Flying Life on Douban is not low.] Although some people didn't have a high evaluation of this movie, a Douban rating of 7.0 wasn't considered low. Han Han was a cross-industry director. Although his works had some shortcomings, they were also qualified and thoughtful. Grading was just a reflection of one's personal opinion. Those who liked him would give him a high score, while those who disliked him would give him a low score. Therefore, it could be said that the Douban rating of " Flying Life " was not low.
Why is Celestial Bane's rating so low?
There were a few reasons why Celestial Bane's ratings were so low. First of all, some comments pointed out that the plot was too fast, that the character of the main character, Zhang Xiaofan, was not well portrayed, and that the description of Big Bamboo Peak was not detailed enough. Secondly, some viewers felt that the degree of adaptation of the play was too high, resulting in a lower rating for the original work. In addition, some viewers questioned the scene of the show and the looks of the male and female leads. However, despite the low ratings, the show did well at the box office. This may be because the audience was not satisfied with the plot, but they were still interested in the film itself. In summary, the above is based on the search results provided.
Why was Ma Xiangyang's Douban rating so high?
Ma Xiangyang's Journey to the Villages was a famous story about a Chinese farmer who returned to the countryside from the city and led the local farmers to change the fate of the village. The reason why the novel had such a high rating on Douban was mainly because of the following points: 1. The plot is attractive: Ma Xiangyang's Journey to the Village tells the story of a Chinese farmer returning to the countryside and leading the local farmers to change the fate of the village. The plot is full of dramatic and complicated, which can arouse the interest and resonance of readers. 2. Vivid characters: The characters in Ma Xiangyang's Journey to the Villages are vivid and distinct. Each character has a unique personality and experience that allows readers to deeply feel their emotions and thoughts. At the same time, the description in the novel was also meticulous, allowing the readers to feel the complexity of rural life and human nature. 3. Profound theme: Ma Xiangyang's Journey to the Villages, by describing the interaction between Ma Xiangyang and the local farmers, explored the gap between urban and rural areas, class contradictions, human nature and emotions, and other profound topics that could arouse readers 'thoughts and resonance, allowing them to understand this work more deeply. In summary, Ma Xiangyang's story, character image, and theme were all outstanding. These factors together made the work popular with readers and gave it a relatively high rating.
Why is the rating of the Flying Life so low?
It could be seen that the rating of Flying Life on Douban was 6.9, which could be said to be relatively low. However, the rating was only a reference indicator. It could be affected by the number of fans and the crowd effect. Some celebrities 'movies were generally rated higher because they had a huge fan base. In addition, some people thought that " Flying Life " was a failure as a commercial film, so the rating did not exceed 8.0. Generally speaking, the ratings were determined by the audience's different views and preferences for the movie. The ratings were only a relatively subjective indicator and could not fully represent the quality of the movie.
Busan is so bad, why is Douban's rating still so high?
I don't know what kind of movie 'Journey to Busan' is, so I can't give a rating for it. However, generally speaking, the rating of a movie was jointly decided by the audience and the critics, and it would be affected by many factors such as the quality of the movie, the plot, the performance of the characters, the visual effects, and so on. Therefore, the rating of a movie might vary due to different factors.