Should the successful work of the debate competition be made into a sequel?
2024-09-17 01:15
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:48
Whether or not they should make a sequel depended on the nature of the work itself and the audience's reaction. For some works such as movies, TV series, novels, etc., the audience might hope for a sequel to continue the story because they already had a good beginning and had high expectations for the subsequent plot. Under such circumstances, it might be a good choice to make a sequel to bring more surprises and satisfaction to the audience. However, there were also some works such as movies, TV series, novels, etc. The audience might not be willing to see the follow-up storyline because the storyline was already complete enough or inevitable changes had already taken place. Under such circumstances, making a sequel would waste resources, destroy the integrity of the story, and could lead to a loss of audience. Whether or not they should make a sequel should be decided based on the situation of the work itself and the audience's reaction. If the audience is full of expectations for the follow-up plot, then making a sequel may be a good choice. If the audience is not willing to see the follow-up plot, then making a sequel may waste resources, destroy the integrity of the story, and may lead to loss of audience.
Should the successful work of the debate competition be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:16
Whether or not they should make a sequel depended on the work itself and the audience's preferences and needs.
Some works were generally considered successful because of their attractive storyline, successful character creation, or unique artistic charm. Therefore, sequels might be made. For example, the Harry Potter series, the Lord of the Rings series, and the Twilight series.
Some works might not be considered sequels because the storyline was dull, the characters were not well portrayed, or the artistic quality was not high enough. For example,'Dream of the Red Chamber',' Water Margins 'and' Journey to the West'.
Whether or not they should make a sequel should be decided based on the situation of the work itself and the audience's reaction. If the audience liked the work very much and the sequels could better meet their needs, they might make sequels. However, if the audience's response was not good or the sequels could not achieve the expected effect, then the sequels might not be made.
The theme of the debate competition was " A successful work should be filmed as a sequel."
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:22
A successful work should be made into a sequela. The positive side can debate from the following aspects:
1. Sequels can increase the satisfaction and audience of a work: In a successful work, the audience can often get enough emotions and story clues from the first episode, hoping that the sequels will continue to push the story forward. By making sequels, the audience could better understand and experience the work, increasing their satisfaction and audience.
Sequels could expand the influence and popularity of a work. The first part of a successful work could often attract enough audiences and establish a certain reputation and influence. Sequels could further expand the influence and popularity of the work, attract more audiences and media attention, and make the work more popular as a classic.
3. Sequels could create more business opportunities and profits: The first film of a successful work could often create enough business opportunities and profits to provide the foundation for subsequent filming. Making sequels could create more business opportunities and profits, expand the industry chain of the work, and make the work more successful.
Sequels can improve the cohesiveness and integrity of the work: the first part of a successful work often has laid the foundation for the subsequent plot and development. Sequels can better maintain the cohesiveness and integrity of the work, allowing the audience to better understand and experience the story.
To sum up, sequels played an important role in the follow-up development of a successful work. It could increase the satisfaction and audience of the work, expand the influence and popularity of the work, create more business opportunities and profits, and maintain the continuity and integrity of the work. Therefore, we should actively support the production of sequels to provide more possibilities for the successful development of the work.
Should a classic (a successful work) be made into a sequel? affirmative debate
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:18
The issue of making a sequel to a classic (a successful work) was a topic worth discussing. I think it's acceptable to make a sequel to a classic because it can give the audience a better experience.
Sequels to classic works could give the audience a chance to see the ending of the story and enjoy the complete storyline. If a film only had one ending, the audience might be disappointed because they couldn't know the future of the story. However, if there was a sequel to this work, the audience could continue to appreciate the story and enjoy the subsequent development.
Sequels to classic works could also attract more audiences because sequels could bring new elements and plots to make the story more colorful. Some sequels to classic works were even more successful in attracting more viewers than the first.
Sequels to classic works could also maintain their status as classics. If a work only had one ending, it might be forgotten as time passed. However, if there was a sequel to this work, it could maintain its iconic status and continue to attract the interest of the audience.
To sum up, I think it's acceptable for a classic (successful work) to make a sequel. Not only could it bring a better experience to the audience, but it could also attract more viewers and maintain the iconic status of the work.
Should the successful work of the 1999 International College Debate Competition be filmed as a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:12
It shouldn't be.
Although the 1999 International College Debate Competition's finale might be popular with readers, it might not necessarily be a suitable work for a sequel. First of all, each work had its own unique characteristics and style. If a sequel was made, it might repeat or strengthen the characteristics of the previous one instead of creating a new story. Secondly, the classic works might be outdated or criticized for damaging the image and value of the previous works. Therefore, even though " 1999 International College Debate Final Success " might be a successful work, it might not be a good choice to make a sequel.
Debate Competition: "A good movie should be made into a sequel"
1 answer
2024-09-20 07:50
It was a very controversial topic in the production of movies whether or not sequels should be made. Some people think that a good movie should be made into a sequel because it allows the audience to enjoy the complete story of the movie and explore the plot more deeply. In addition, making sequels could also bring more business opportunities and profits to the film production company.
However, there were also some people who believed that making sequels would not necessarily lead to good film production because sequels might repeat the mistakes and shortcomings of the previous films or lack the unique charm of the previous films. In addition, too many sequels could lead to fierce competition in the film market and reduce the quality and appeal of the film.
Whether or not a movie should be made depended on the personal preferences and needs of each film production company and audience. If a good film could attract the interest of the audience and bring commercial success, then making a sequel might be a good choice. However, if the sequels couldn't surpass the quality and charm of the previous one, then too many sequels might reduce the overall quality of the movie.
Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-20 07:12
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be made into a sequel was a topic worth discussing. Here are some ideas that might help answer this question:
Supporting the view of making a sequel:
The sequels of classic movies and TV series could once again attract the audience to bring new experiences and surprises.
2. The sequels of classic movies and TV series could maintain the style and theme of the original works and carry out innovation and development on this basis.
Three sequels could bring more commercial benefits because they could attract more audiences and investments.
Opposition to the sequels:
The sequels of classic movies and TV series may destroy the image and meaning of the original work and repeat and extend it.
2. The classic works have already been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Making sequels may disappoint and tire the audience.
The three-shot sequels might distract the fans and audience of the original work and lead to a decline in the evaluation of the original work.
To sum up, there is no absolute answer to this question because whether or not to make a sequel depends on the decision of the audience and the film producers. If the audience was interested in the sequels of classic movies and television dramas and were willing to support the film producers, as well as the confidence and resources to create new and valuable content, then the sequels might be successful. However, if the audience was unwilling or unable to accept the sequels, the film producers could not guarantee their success. Therefore, it was important to find a balance so that the sequels could not only satisfy the needs of the audience, but also bring commercial and reputational benefits to the film producers.
Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-20 07:10
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be filmed was a more complicated question. For details, one could refer to the following points:
1. Sequels to classic movies and TV shows may exist because people are still interested in the previous work or some plot or theme of the previous work needs further exploration or development. In addition, sequels could also provide the audience with a sense of freshness and surprise, allowing them to continue to enjoy the story and performance of the work.
Two sequels might also have a negative impact on the original works of classic movies and television dramas. If the quality of the sequels was not as good as the previous one, the audience might lose interest in the sequels and have a negative impact on the original. In addition, if the sequel completely plagiarized or plagiarized the content of the original work, it might also damage the reputation and influence of the original work.
Therefore, making a sequel to a classic film and television drama was a possible choice, but it needed to be carefully considered to avoid negatively affecting the original work. Most importantly, sequels should be based on sufficient research and consideration to ensure that they faithfully present the theme and plot of the original work.
Debate competition, should a successful work make a sequel? We are the affirmative side, so we should make a sequel. Ask questions from the opposing side, the more the better.
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:34
Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions.
1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work?
Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work?
Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit?
Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work?
Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened?
I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.
A successful work should not be remade. The second debate is a problem.
1 answer
2024-09-05 07:22
This view was correct. Successful literary works were usually time-tested, with unique styles and profound thoughts, which made them difficult to remake.
A remake might try to imitate their style and ideas, but it often failed to reach the level of the original and might even lose the original's characteristics and depth. In addition, the original works usually have a large number of readers and fans, while the remakes may not be able to obtain these support, making it difficult for them to succeed.
Therefore, successful works should not be remade. Of course, this does not mean that all literary works should not be remade as long as they can maintain their own characteristics and depth and obtain the recognition and support of readers.
Competition and Cooperation Debate
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:31
Positive point of view:
Competition is an important driving force for social progress and development. It can promote the innovation and competitiveness of individuals and organizations, and promote economic development and scientific and technological progress. Competition in the business field can promote the difference and innovation between enterprises, improve the quality and efficiency of products and services, and bring more business opportunities and profits. Competition in the field of science and technology could promote technological innovation and development, improve technological standards and competitiveness, and bring more business opportunities and market share.
However, competition can also lead to negative consequences such as market failure, monopoly, and unfair competition. Monopolists could gain unfair advantages through pricing and controlling resources, affecting consumer welfare and market competition. In addition, monopolies may gain market share and profits through improper means, causing adverse effects on society and the economy.
Therefore, competition should be conducted under the premise of law and morality. All parties should abide by the principle of fair competition and avoid unfair means and unfair competition. In the field of business and technology, the government should formulate relevant policies and regulations to promote market competition and cooperation to ensure consumer welfare and market order.
Opposite point of view:
Cooperation is an important force to promote social progress and development. It can promote the coordination and cooperation of individuals and organizations, enhance creativity and innovation, and improve the overall efficiency and welfare of society. Cooperation in the business field could achieve better results through joint innovation and resource sharing to improve the quality and efficiency of products and services. Cooperation in the field of science and technology could promote academic research and technological innovation, improve technological standards and competitiveness, and bring more business opportunities and market share.
However, there were also some problems in cooperation, such as lack of competitiveness, insufficient innovation, waste of resources, and so on. Cooperation may lead to the alienation or neglect of some individuals or organizations, resulting in a lack of competitiveness and innovation. In addition, cooperation may also lead to some immoral behavior and monopolistic behavior, which will have a negative impact on society and the economy.
Therefore, cooperation should be conducted legally and ethically. All parties should abide by the principles of honesty and sharing to strengthen cooperation and innovation. In the fields of business and technology, the government should formulate relevant policies and regulations to promote cooperation and innovation to ensure consumer welfare and market order.
Popular Searches
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z