From Confucius 'remarks, it could be seen that he emphasized the importance of learning knowledge, but there were also the following shortcomings: 1. Practicalism: Confucius's thoughts emphasize practicality. He believes that learning knowledge is to solve practical problems. However, in an agricultural society, how to farm was the key to solving practical problems, so Confucius 'answer may not be completely accurate. 2. The lack of practice: Confucius 'thought attached importance to practice, but his answer lacked specific guidance on practice. Without a good practical environment and practical skills, learning knowledge might not be able to really play a role. 3. Disdain emotion: In Confucius 'thought, emotion and morality were very important aspects. However, in an agricultural society, how to take care of the family and the land was also very important. Therefore, Confucius 'answer might not have taken these aspects into consideration. 4. Insufficient knowledge reserves: Although Confucius emphasized the importance of learning knowledge, his knowledge reserves may not be enough to solve the practical problems at that time. Therefore, his answer might lack the latest knowledge and technology. Confucius 'thought emphasized the importance of learning knowledge, but there were also some shortcomings. It needed to consider various factors in order to truly play a role.
This classical Chinese was a passage from Chen Yuanfang's "Book of Studies with Friends". The original text was: "The Duke of Zhou did not learn from Confucius, Confucius did not learn from the Duke of Zhou." It meant that the Duke of Zhou did not learn how to be a monarch from Confucius, and Confucius did not learn how to be a monarch from the Duke of Zhou. The subtlety of this sentence was that it expressed two different ways of learning. The Duke of Zhou and Confucius were both famous figures in history, but their learning methods were different. The Duke of Zhou learned through his own practice and experience, while Confucius learned through reading classics and thinking. This different way of learning allowed them to achieve different results. This sentence also tells us that everyone has a different way of learning. We need to find a suitable way of learning and constantly improve our quality and ability through reading, practice and thinking.
In the classical Chinese, Chen Yuanfang said: The Duke of Zhou did not learn from Confucius, Confucius did not learn from the Duke of Zhou. This meant that the Duke of Zhou (Ji Chang) would not learn from Confucius and Confucius would not learn from the Duke of Zhou. This sentence expressed the difference between the two great historical figures and also reflected the "dignity of teachers" emphasized in traditional Chinese culture. The subtlety of this sentence was that it emphasized the equality and dignity of the teacher-student relationship. Confucius, as a great teacher, emphasized that students should learn independently and not rely on their teachers. At the same time, he also believed that teachers should maintain their own lofty and noble dignity. They could not learn from anyone else and could only rely on their own wisdom to enlighten students. The Duke of Zhou and Confucius were both great figures in Chinese history. Their thoughts and ideas had a far-reaching impact on Chinese history. This sentence also reflected the view of the teacher-student relationship in Chinese traditional culture.
Because the author of Confucius and his student was unknown. Online literature knowledge referred to the various literary works circulating on the Internet, including novels, essays, poems, and so on. These works are usually written by different authors and may be published at different times and places.
This was an allusion to Confucius. The story went like this: One day, Zi Lu, a student of Confucius, saw an old man crying by the roadside because he had lost his cow. Zilu asked him what had happened. The old man told him that his cow had been stolen by a group of bad people. Zilu told the old man that he could help him find his cow. The old man was so grateful that he gave all his property to Zilu to express his gratitude. However, Zilu didn't give him the cow but told him that he should find her cow himself. After hearing this story, Confucius expressed his appreciation for Zilu's approach and educated him, saying,"What people should do is to lose and lose, so that they do nothing." For example, when the cow comes back and Zilu doesn't take it, it's one of the losses. If you don't take it and ask for it outside, it's one of the ways of inaction. Therefore, those who do it must do it because they do not do it." It means that we should do things that can reduce losses until we reach the state of inaction. Just like how Zilu didn't ask for help from others after his cow was stolen, he went to find it himself. This was an act to reduce losses. If he asked for help from others instead of seeking it himself, it would be an act of pursuing external objects. Therefore, to make the right choice, one had to make it themselves.
In the Analects of Confucius, Confucius answered three people's questions about filial piety. These three people were his parents, son, and brother. Here are Confucius 'answers to these three questions: Confucius replied to his parents 'question: "The filial piety is to serve their parents and raise their bodies for fear of humiliation. Being able to act externally and be benevolent internally is called filial piety." Filial piety referred to sacrificing one's actions and heart in order to take care of one's parents and make them happy. At the same time, he had to show his dignity and benevolence. That was the most important thing. Confucius replied to his son's question,"Filial piety makes parents not worry. If you don't go against your words and don't go against your actions, it's called filial piety." Filial piety meant that one had to obey their parents 'wishes verbally and at the same time, their behavior had to be in line with the norms so that their parents would not worry. Confucius replied to his brother's question,"Filial piety is to serve his elder brother. If there is something lacking, send someone to teach it. If you don't listen to something, you'll make others not listen. If the brothers are harmonious, the family will be harmonious, but if the brothers are not harmonious, the family will be broken." It meant that "filial piety" referred to showing one's ability and respect in order to take care of one's brother. If the elder brother is in trouble, try your best to help him; If the elder brother does not listen to the teachings, try to make him listen. Brothers should be harmonious so that the entire family could be more harmonious.
In the Analects of Confucius, Confucius answered three questions about filial piety: 1 Tsze-kung asked,"Is there a single word that can be carried out for the rest of your life?" The Master said,"How can I forgive? Don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you." (From the Analects of Confucius, Duke Ling of Wei) "Do you have a mother?" asked Mencius 'mother. The Master said,"Yes, my mother. It's the middle of the Meng family." (From The Analects of Confucius, Zi Han) 3 Yan Yuan asked,"Is it natural to be filial to the extreme?" The Master said,"Yes. Parents love and respect what they love and respect. Even if he's thousands of miles away, I still respect him." (From The Analects of Confucius, Xue Er) Confucius 'answers emphasized two aspects of filial piety: the love and respect of parents and self-cultivation and compliance. He emphasized that filial piety was not only an act towards parents, but also an attitude and values that required self-cultivation and practice. These answers also reflected Confucius 'understanding and promotion of filial piety.
Confucius was a great ancient Chinese ideologist and teacher. His thoughts had a far-reaching influence and was known as Confucianism. The Analects of Confucius was a record of the words and deeds of Confucius and his disciples. It was one of the Confucian classics that contained the essence of Confucius 'thoughts and educational concepts. The core of Confucius 'ideology was benevolence. He believed that human nature was good, but social environment and education could change a person's nature to become a better person. In order to realize benevolence, Confucius advocated respecting, caring and loving others, and taught people to live in harmony and help each other. Confucius emphasized on "propriety". He believed that etiquette was a symbol of social order and civilization, and should be respected and observed. Therefore, Confucius taught people to follow etiquette and respect others to maintain social stability and harmony. Confucius also emphasized learning. He believed that learning was an important way for human beings to make progress. They should keep learning, exploring, and making progress. For this reason, Confucius advocated that students should be modest, diligent, and loving to constantly improve their morality and wisdom. Confucius 'thoughts had a profound influence on ancient and modern China. Its educational philosophy emphasized respect for others, care for others, love for others, advocate learning, and live in harmony. These values are still of great significance today. The Analects of Confucius, as one of the Confucian classics, is also an important part of Chinese culture, which is worthy of our in-depth study and inheritance.
The works of Confucius referred to the Analects of Confucius. The Analects of Confucius was one of the ancient classics of China. It recorded the words and deeds of Confucius and his disciples. It was one of the most important documents of Confucianism and had a profound influence on politics, philosophy, morality, education and other fields in ancient China and later generations. The Analects of Confucius had a total of 20 articles, each consisting of multiple sentences, mostly involving life philosophy, moral education, political views and other aspects of content.
The Analects of Confucius was one of the ancient Chinese classics. It contained a lot of knowledge about morality, politics, philosophy, and other aspects. It was known as one of the Confucian classics. The following is the full text of the Analects of Confucius: The original text of the Analects of Confucius is as follows: Isn't it good to learn and practice from time to time? Isn't it a pleasure to have friends come from afar? Isn't it a gentleman not to be angry when others don't know? Translator: Isn't it fun to review often after studying? Isn't it nice to have friends from afar? Isn't it very gentlemanly not to be angry when others don't understand you? This was the most famous passage in the Analects of Confucius and was considered one of the core of Confucianism. This passage emphasized the importance of learning, as well as the importance of interpersonal relationships and gentlemanly demeanor. It tells us that constant learning and socializing with others is an indispensable part of life. Only in this way can we become gentlemen with character and grace.
The Analects of Confucius was one of the ancient classics of China. Its content covered many aspects such as morality, philosophy, politics, education, and so on. The following is the full text of the Analects of Confucius: The original text of the Analects of Confucius is as follows: Isn't it good to learn and practice from time to time? Isn't it a pleasure to have friends come from afar? Isn't it a gentleman not to be angry when others don't know? Learning without thinking is lost, thinking without learning is dangerous. To review the old and understand the new can be a teacher. The rise of poetry, the establishment of etiquette, the completion of music. The gentleman pursues the root, the root is established, and the Tao is born. Is filial piety the root of benevolence? It is not enough to observe the glory of the country and the glory of the family to observe its greatness. A gentleman is harmonious but not harmonious. A villain is harmonious but not harmonious. Do unto others what you would not have them do unto you. Let him speak first, and then let him act. He is faithful, studious, benevolent and observant. Love the people and love the people. If you have spare power, you can learn literature. That's all. It's a mistake to look back at yesterday. A gentleman can help others to do good things, but he can't help others to do bad things. The villain is the opposite. Raise the upright and correct the wronged, so that the wronged can be straightened out. If you don't know fate, you can't be a gentleman. If you don't know etiquette, you can't stand up. If you don't know what to say, you can't know what to say. A gentleman is harmonious but not harmonious. A villain is harmonious but not harmonious. A gentleman's way is expensive and difficult to mess up, so he loses what he has done, and what he has done is rich. The common people are easy to change, but they are confused and lose what they do, but they do not think it is wrong. The way of a gentleman is simple and clear. The way of a villain is dangerous and deceitful. A gentleman should attach importance to benevolence, save money and love others. The way of a gentleman hates all kinds of injustice and likes all kinds of righteousness. The way of the villain is to love injustice and hate righteousness. The gentleman is well-behaved and educated, and the villain is educated and confused. The way of a gentleman is different from that of a gentleman. The way of a villain is the same but not abandoned. A gentleman is harmonious but not harmonious. A villain is harmonious but not harmonious. The way of a gentleman is simple and beautiful, and the way of a villain is simple and harmonious. The way of a gentleman is pure, but the way of a villain is mixed and lacking. A gentleman should be faithful and thrifty, love people who are in chaos and do not go against the law. A gentleman is loyal to benevolence and hates all kinds of unjust and thrifty expenses. He loves people who are confused but not unreasonable. The gentleman's Tao is broad, but the villain's Tao is chaotic, but he loses what he does. A gentleman speaks of righteousness and a villain speaks of profit. A gentleman is harmonious but not harmonious. A villain is harmonious but not harmonious. A gentleman is honest and agile in his conduct and does not spread his reputation as a gentleman.