What are the similarities and differences between the image of "zero surplus" in Yu Dafu's novels and the image of "surplus" in Russian literature?The image of "zero surplus" in Yu Dafu's novels and the image of "surplus" in Russian literature were both describing the same kind of person. However, there were some differences in the setting of the characters, the description of the characteristics, and the handling of the plot.
similarities and differences:
1 was to describe the image of a certain type of person. The zeroes and the superfluous both described the image of loneliness, poverty, helplessness, superfluity, weirdness, unsociable personality, unhealthy mentality, and so on.
Both were describing social phenomena. In Yu Dafu's novels, the phenomenon of zero-surplus existed in the society at that time, while the phenomenon of "surplus" in Russian literature was the social reality of a specific historical period.
They were all images that were oppressed by society. In Yu Dafu's novels, the superfluous people were oppressed and exploited by society, and often lost their freedom and dignity. In Russian literature, the superfluous people were ostracized and isolated by society, and often felt pain and helplessness.
The difference:
1. Different cultural backgrounds. Yu Dafu's modern Chinese novels were inspired by his own experiences and feelings. His works reflected the reality of Chinese society and the sufferings of the people at that time. On the other hand, Russian literature was based on Russian traditional literature, reflecting the reality of Russian society and the sufferings of the people at that time.
2. The storyline was handled differently. In Yu Dafu's novels, the protagonist was often oppressed by society and struggled to survive in adversity. The plot was complicated and varied, with a certain degree of drama and twists. The "superfluous" in Russian literature was often isolated and rejected. The plot was relatively simple and mainly described the psychological changes of the protagonist.
3. Different characters. In Yu Dafu's novels, the "surplus" has the basic characteristics of simplicity, kindness and optimism, while the "surplus" in Russian literature has the characteristics of loneliness, helplessness, weirdness and inferiority. The characters are more distinctive and distinctive.
Yu Dafu's Literature KnowledgeYu Dafu was a famous modern Chinese writer. His works were full of personality and described real life and human nature. He was known as the pioneer of modern Chinese literature. The following is some general knowledge about Yu Dafu's literature:
Yu Dafu's literary style is mainly realism. His works mostly describe real life and human nature, especially the lives and fates of the people at the bottom of China. His novels often had a strong realism color, but also focused on the performance of human nature's good and evil, joys and sorrows, and the cycle of life and death.
Yu Dafu's works cover a wide range of topics, including novels, essays, essays, scripts, etc. Among them, novels are the most famous. His representative works included "Sinking,""Spring Silkworm,""Border Town,""Life and Death Field," and so on. These works were regarded as classics of modern Chinese literature.
3. Yu Dafu's works have a strong personality and style. His writing style is unique, and his language is concise and bright, full of expressiveness and appeal. His novels often used a large number of rhetorical devices and symbolism to express unique thoughts and emotions.
Yu Dafu was also a modern Chinese literary critic. His literary thoughts and theories had a profound impact on the development of modern Chinese literature. His Literature Magazine was one of the most important journals of modern Chinese literature. His literary theory and critical thoughts had played an important role in guiding the development of modern Chinese literature.
5 Yu Dafu's life experience is more complicated. He studied at Peking University, Tokyo Higher Normal School and Tokyo Imperial University in Japan. He has a multi-disciplinary background. His works and life experiences also reflected the development process and cultural background of modern Chinese literature.
What was the difference between the image of literature and the image of music?Literature and music are both art forms, but they have very different ways of shaping images.
Literature is to create images through language. Language is the main method of expression in literature. Through the use of language, literature can convey the emotions, thoughts, and behaviors of the characters, as well as the background and plot of the story. Images in literary works are abstract. They are not directly presented in the text, but expressed indirectly through language and rhetoric.
Music, on the other hand, used elements such as melody, harmony, and rhythm to create an image. The image of music was directly presented to the listener, who could feel the emotions, thoughts, and emotions in the music, and then understand and feel the information conveyed in the work. The image of music is concrete. It can be accurately described and expressed.
Therefore, literature and music had very different ways of creating images. Literature expressed images through language and rhetoric, while music expressed images through elements such as melody, harmony, and rhythm. Although they were expressed in different ways, the information and emotions they conveyed were similar. They all resonated and felt through these elements.
What are the characteristics of the image of the people in Yu Dafu's novels?In Yu Dafu's novels, the image of the people with more than one person has the following characteristics:
1. Loneliness and helplessness: Those who have nothing to do often live in poverty and loneliness without the company of relatives and friends, without any support and protection.
2. Floating and unpredictable: The fate of the people is often unstable. They often drift in different cities and regions for various reasons and are unable to live permanently.
3. The law of the jungle: The society where people live is often a society where the law of the jungle preys on them. They have to rely on their own strength to survive, and sometimes they have to rely on cruel struggles and violence.
4. Confusion of thoughts: Due to poverty and isolation, people often lack correct thoughts and values. Their thoughts sometimes fall into confusion and confusion.
5. Tragic fate: The fate of those who have no survivors is often tragic. They often encounter various diseases, natural and man-made disasters and man-made disasters, and even lose their lives.
Which friend can explain the difference between "people's literature" and "popular literature"?"People's literature" and "popular literature" were two different literary schools and concepts in the history of Chinese literature.
"People's literature" refers to novels, poems, essays, and other literary works that reflect the lives, thoughts, feelings, and cultural needs of the people with the purpose of serving the people. It emphasized the social responsibility and aesthetic value of literature and aimed to provide spiritual food and cultural heritage for the people. In Chinese history, the representative figures of "people's literature" were Lu Xun, Lao She, Ba Jin, etc.
" Popular literature " referred to literary works that aimed to meet the needs of the masses and the pursuit of economic benefits and commercial success for the market and readers. It emphasized the commercial and utility of literature, pursued the recognition and acceptance of the market and readers, and aimed to provide entertainment and consumption for the public. In the history of China, the representative figures of "popular literature" were Jin Yong, Gu Long, Qiong Yao, etc.
Although "people's literature" and "popular literature" both referred to literary works, there were obvious differences in their purposes, objectives, audiences, and aesthetic standards.
The difference between youth literature and literatureYouth literature usually refers to the literature works that describe young people's growth, self-exploration, and the difficulties of puberty. The topics often include love, friendship, self-awareness, and growth. Youth literature tended to pay more attention to emotional descriptions and psychological explorations, as well as social reality and growing environment.
In contrast to youth literature, literature usually referred to various types of literary works, including novels, poems, essays, plays, and so on. The topics and content of literature were very broad, covering readers of all ages and cultures. The creation of literature usually paid more attention to ideology and artistry, hoping to convey human experience and wisdom.
The difference between literature and non-literatureLiterature and non-literature were two different concepts. The specific differences were as follows:
Literature is a form of art that uses language, literary style, images, emotions, and other means to express human life, social history, cultural values, and other topics. The creation of literature required a certain level of literary attainment and language ability, including the standard, artistic, and expressive use of language. Literature has a unique aesthetic value and cultural significance that can influence human thoughts, emotions, and behavior.
Non-literature is a broader concept that includes various art forms such as painting, sculpture, music, dance, drama, film, etc. Non-literary creation mainly focused on the object and method of expression rather than the value and meaning of literature. Non-literary works can also have a strong cultural influence, but they usually do not have the literary characteristics and aesthetic value of literary works.
Therefore, the main difference between literature and non-literature lies in the purpose of creation, the way of creation, and the characteristics of literature. Literature had a unique aesthetic and cultural value, while non-literature paid more attention to artistic forms and objects of expression.
The difference between Xiao Hong and Yu Dafu's autobiographical novelsXiao Hong and Yu Dafu were both modern Chinese, but their autobiographies had some significant differences.
Xiao Hong's novels usually revolved around her personal experiences. She used her childhood, youth, and middle-aged experiences as clues to describe her growth in society, family, love, and literature. Her novels were often filled with feminism, focusing on the life experience and fate of individuals, as well as the difficulties and challenges of women in Chinese society.
In contrast, Yu Dafu's novels focused more on the description of modern Chinese history and political changes. His novels usually covered the social life of China from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the middle of the 20th century, depicting the fate of people of different social classes, different regions, and different historical periods. His novels were also often patriotic and nationalistic, focusing on China's national rejuvenation and the process of its modernisation.
Therefore, Xiao Hong's novels paid more attention to individual life experience and feminism while Yu Dafu's novels paid more attention to modern Chinese history and political changes, as well as the fate of people of different social classes, different regions and different historical periods.
Yu Dafu's artistic style and its place in the history of literature?Yu Dafu's novels had a unique artistic style, which described the urban and rural life in China, reflected social reality and explored human nature. At the same time, it also integrated elements of Japanese literature and Western realism. His novel was concise in language, vivid in plot, and detailed in character, which was deeply loved by readers.
In the history of literature, Yu Dafu was one of the important representatives of modern Chinese literature and was hailed as the pioneer of modern Chinese novels. His works had a profound impact on the development of modern Chinese novels and was hailed as "one of the founders of modern Chinese literature". His novels were not only widely spread in China, but also well received by foreign readers, contributing to the process of China's modernisation.
What's the difference between foreign literature and Chinese literature?There are many differences between foreign literature and Chinese literature.
1. Literature style: The literary styles of foreign literature and Chinese literature have their own characteristics. Foreign literature usually focuses on describing the inner world and emotional experience of the characters in the main styles of realism, romanticism, symbolism, etc., while Chinese literature focuses on describing social reality and life philosophy in the main styles of realism, realism, expressionism, etc.
2. Genre of literary works: Both foreign literature and Chinese literature have different types of literary works such as novels, poems, plays, essays, etc. However, the types of literary works in Chinese literature were more diverse. In addition to novels, poems, plays, and essays, there were also notes, novels, legends, history, myths, and so on.
3. History of literary development: The history of Chinese literature is longer than that of foreign literature, with rich cultural heritage and traditions. In the course of the development of Chinese literature, many important literary schools appeared, such as Tang poetry, Song poetry, Yuan opera, Ming and Qing novels, etc. On the other hand, the development of foreign literature was relatively fast. Starting with modernist literature, it experienced the development of realism, romanticism, symbolism, expressionism and many other literary schools.
4. Literature evaluation standards: The evaluation standards of Chinese literature tend to pay more attention to the ideology and artistic value of the works, while foreign literature pays more attention to the literary skills and language arts of the works, as well as the psychological influence and enlightenment of the works on the readers.
Foreign literature and Chinese literature are very different in literary style, literary work type, literary development process and literary evaluation standards, but they are both excellent literary heritages with their own unique charm and value.