Would Doujinshi, which wrote world famous works, violate copyright?
Doujinshi that wrote world-famous works might violate copyright because it was essentially a re-creation of a masterpiece. It would change the theme, plot, characters, and other elements of the masterpiece, causing it to lose the original copyright. Although the author of the famous works had passed away, their copyrights still belonged to the publishing house until the copyright expired. If you change elements of a famous book without permission when writing fanfiction, then this action may constitute copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, writers should respect the copyright of the original work as much as possible and not make unauthorized modifications or creations. At the same time, if you want to create fanfiction, you also need to consider the copyright issue. It's best to consult the copyright owner of the masterpiece and obtain permission.
Would copying and selling a calligraphy work violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy work? If it was a violation, which article of the copyright law would it violate? what is the basis
The copying and selling of calligraphy works may violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works. The specific violation of the copyright law needs to be judged according to the specific circumstances. According to the third paragraph of article 10 of the copyright law, the right to reproduce a copy belongs to the author. Without the permission of the author, no one can create or publish a copy. If he copied the calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's right to copy. According to the first paragraph of article 2 of the copyright law, the creation of works, including modification, adaptation, translation, compilation, suppression, etc., should be negotiated and approved. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can do this. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. According to the first paragraph of article 21 of the copyright law, the use of works by means of reproduction, distribution, rental, exhibition, performance, screening, broadcasting, information network transmission, etc. shall be negotiated and permitted. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one shall carry out this act. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. Whether copying calligraphy works and selling them violates the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works requires specific analysis. If any of the rights in the copyright are violated, it may constitute a copyright violation.
Would changing a novel into a comic violate copyright?
The adaptation of a novel into a comic book does not necessarily violate copyright, depending on the method and content of the adaptation. If the manga is an independent work and its creation method, content, and style are not directly related to the original novel, the creator can create it according to his own creativity and have the right to adapt it into a manga or other forms of work. However, if the author copied, adapted, or modified the content of the original novel to adapt a comic or other works, or used the content of the original novel as the basis to construct a story with the same theme as the original novel, the author might violate the copyright of the original novel. Therefore, when adapting a novel into a manga, the author had to be careful not to violate the copyright of the original novel and ensure that his adaptation was legal.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
Sequel novels did not violate copyright because they were a form of doujinshi creation. Doujinshi referred to derivative works based on the original work. They could be a continuation, adaptation, translation, continuation, rewrite, and other forms of work. In this case, the author's copyright still applied to the original work and the continuation work was a legal derivative work. However, if the author used the characters, storyline, settings, and other elements of the original work in the process of writing a continuation of the novel, or maliciously tampered with or distorted the original work, then it might violate the copyright of the original work. In this case, the author who continued to write the novel had to bear the risk of copyright violation. Therefore, if you want to continue writing a novel, it's best to understand the relevant laws and regulations first to ensure that your creation conforms to the law and avoid copyright infringement.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
The continuation of a novel did not violate copyright, but if the content of the previous novel was re-created and published without authorization, it might violate the copyright of the author of the previous novel. This was because copyright protected the author's creativity and ideas, not the specific content of the story. If you continue to write on the basis of the previous novel and maintain the basic elements of the story structure, characters, and plot, and only use it as a source of creation, it may not violate copyright. However, if the continuation works went beyond the scope of the previous novel or greatly adapted the previous novel or used a large number of original characters and plots, it might violate copyright. Therefore, a continuation novel should be written after obtaining the authorization of the author of the previous novel to avoid possible legal risks.
Does imitating other people's works violate copyright?
Imitation of another person's work does not violate copyright, but copying, copying, adapting, or translating another person's work without identifying the author or copyright owner may constitute an act of copyright violation. In the process of imitating other people's works, if there are original elements such as new storylines, character creation, worldview, etc., then this imitation can be regarded as a creative act that does not violate copyright. However, if you simply copy, paste, adapt, or translate someone else's work without any original creation, then this behavior may constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the copyrights of the imitated work have been obtained by others, then copying, adapting, or translating the work again will also constitute copyright violation. Therefore, when imitating other people's works, one should pay attention to whether there are original elements and strictly abide by the relevant provisions of the copyright law.
Using a famous comic as a prototype, drawing it yourself and then publishing it, will it violate copyright?
Using a famous manga as a prototype for creation and distribution may violate copyright. This was because, according to the copyright law, without the permission of the copyright owner, no one could copy, distribute, display, perform, play, adapt, translate, or use the content of a famous comic to create. If you use a famous comic as a prototype and do not obtain the permission of the copyright owner, it may constitute a copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, it is recommended to understand the relevant copyright laws before creating and try to obtain the permission of the copyright owner or use the content of famous comics in other legal ways.
Will the article that references other people's works violate the copyright of others?
Generally speaking, the use of other people's works in an article would not violate the copyright of others. However, if the cited works have been granted public copyright or have become public knowledge resources, then the use of works may constitute an act of copyright violation. In addition, if you modify, translate, or continue to write other people's works when you quote them, it may also lead to copyright issues. In order to avoid the problem of copyright, it is recommended to ensure that the source of the cited content is legal and the source is indicated. In addition, the relevant provisions of the copyright law should also be strictly adhered to in the creative process to avoid any acts of copyright violation.
Does fan fiction violate copyright?
It depends. In some cases, if the fan fiction uses copyrighted characters or settings without permission, it can violate copyright. But if it's transformative and doesn't harm the original work's market, it might be okay.
Did the article "Falling" violate the copyright?
He wasn't sure if the article " Falling " was a copyright violation because he wasn't sure if it was an original. If the article was originally written by an author and it did not violate anyone's copyright, then it would not violate. To determine whether an article was an copyright violation, one needed to determine whether it was an original work or whether it violated someone else's copyright. If you are not sure if this article is an copyright violation, please consult a professional lawyer or copyright expert.
Does Doujin novel violate copyright?
Doujinshi referred to works that created their own stories and characters based on existing literary works. Normally, Doujinshi novels would involve the copyright of the original work because the creation of Doujinshi novels was similar to adaptation and re-creation. There were different opinions on whether doujinshi novels violated copyright. Some people believe that doujinshi itself does not violate copyright because the form of creation of doujinshi novels is legal. It is just that when borrowing the characters, plot, and other elements of the original work, you need to abide by the relevant rules of the original work's copyright. There were also some who believed that doujin novels would violate the copyright of the original works because the creation of doujin novels could affect the image and plot of the original works to varying degrees, or even completely replace the original works. Regardless of the point of view, the creation of doujin novels had to abide by the relevant provisions of the copyright law, such as the public distribution of their works without the authorization of the copyright owner. At the same time, when creating Doujinshi novels, one had to respect the copyright of the original work and avoid violating the rights of others.