Would Doujinshi, which wrote world famous works, violate copyright?
Doujinshi that wrote world-famous works might violate copyright because it was essentially a re-creation of a masterpiece. It would change the theme, plot, characters, and other elements of the masterpiece, causing it to lose the original copyright. Although the author of the famous works had passed away, their copyrights still belonged to the publishing house until the copyright expired. If you change elements of a famous book without permission when writing fanfiction, then this action may constitute copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, writers should respect the copyright of the original work as much as possible and not make unauthorized modifications or creations. At the same time, if you want to create fanfiction, you also need to consider the copyright issue. It's best to consult the copyright owner of the masterpiece and obtain permission.
Would Doujinshi, which wrote world famous works, violate copyright?
Whether or not a doujinshi that wrote a world-famous work would violate copyright depended on whether the doujinshi was based on elements or plots of the original work, and whether or not it had been modified or recreated in an original way. If the doujinshi you created simply quoted an element or plot from the original work without any original modification or re-creation, then this act of borrowing may not cause copyright issues. For example, it was legal to quote a character's lines or a certain plot segment instead of creating a new understanding of it. However, if the co-author made original modifications or recreations based on certain elements or plots of the original work, this behavior may violate the copyright of the original work. For example, if a certain plot or character in a doujinshi was similar to the original work and had been modified or recreated, then the doujinshi might violate the copyright of the original work. If you intend to create doujinshi, it's best to make sure that your actions do not violate the copyright of the original work. He could avoid the problem of copyright violation by understanding the copyright regulations of the original work and avoiding plagiarism when creating.
Would copying and selling a calligraphy work violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy work? If it was a violation, which article of the copyright law would it violate? what is the basis
The copying and selling of calligraphy works may violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works. The specific violation of the copyright law needs to be judged according to the specific circumstances. According to the third paragraph of article 10 of the copyright law, the right to reproduce a copy belongs to the author. Without the permission of the author, no one can create or publish a copy. If he copied the calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's right to copy. According to the first paragraph of article 2 of the copyright law, the creation of works, including modification, adaptation, translation, compilation, suppression, etc., should be negotiated and approved. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can do this. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. According to the first paragraph of article 21 of the copyright law, the use of works by means of reproduction, distribution, rental, exhibition, performance, screening, broadcasting, information network transmission, etc. shall be negotiated and permitted. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one shall carry out this act. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. Whether copying calligraphy works and selling them violates the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works requires specific analysis. If any of the rights in the copyright are violated, it may constitute a copyright violation.
Would continuing to write a work violate copyright?
As long as the continuation works did not belong to the category of "original works" as stipulated in the copyright law or did not violate the core rights of the author of the original works, such as the right of authorization, the right of modification, etc., it would not violate the copyright. What copyright protects is the author's creativity and independent thinking ability, while a continuation is a re-creation of part or all of the original work. Its creative ideas and artistic value are different from the original work. Therefore, the continuation of the work did not belong to the category of "original work" as stipulated in the copyright law. There was no need to pay the copyright fee to the author of the original work. Of course, if the continuation works were similar to the original works or even directly copied the contents of the original works, it might violate the copyright of the original works. Therefore, when continuing to write a work, it is necessary to avoid violating the rights of the original author. You can use your own creativity and ideas to create and express your own creative ideas and artistic value in the work.
Would changing a novel into a comic violate copyright?
The adaptation of a novel into a comic book does not necessarily violate copyright, depending on the method and content of the adaptation. If the manga is an independent work and its creation method, content, and style are not directly related to the original novel, the creator can create it according to his own creativity and have the right to adapt it into a manga or other forms of work. However, if the author copied, adapted, or modified the content of the original novel to adapt a comic or other works, or used the content of the original novel as the basis to construct a story with the same theme as the original novel, the author might violate the copyright of the original novel. Therefore, when adapting a novel into a manga, the author had to be careful not to violate the copyright of the original novel and ensure that his adaptation was legal.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
Sequel novels did not violate copyright because they were a form of doujinshi creation. Doujinshi referred to derivative works based on the original work. They could be a continuation, adaptation, translation, continuation, rewrite, and other forms of work. In this case, the author's copyright still applied to the original work and the continuation work was a legal derivative work. However, if the author used the characters, storyline, settings, and other elements of the original work in the process of writing a continuation of the novel, or maliciously tampered with or distorted the original work, then it might violate the copyright of the original work. In this case, the author who continued to write the novel had to bear the risk of copyright violation. Therefore, if you want to continue writing a novel, it's best to understand the relevant laws and regulations first to ensure that your creation conforms to the law and avoid copyright infringement.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
The continuation of a novel did not violate copyright, but if the content of the previous novel was re-created and published without authorization, it might violate the copyright of the author of the previous novel. This was because copyright protected the author's creativity and ideas, not the specific content of the story. If you continue to write on the basis of the previous novel and maintain the basic elements of the story structure, characters, and plot, and only use it as a source of creation, it may not violate copyright. However, if the continuation works went beyond the scope of the previous novel or greatly adapted the previous novel or used a large number of original characters and plots, it might violate copyright. Therefore, a continuation novel should be written after obtaining the authorization of the author of the previous novel to avoid possible legal risks.
Does imitating other people's works violate copyright?
Imitation of another person's work does not violate copyright, but copying, copying, adapting, or translating another person's work without identifying the author or copyright owner may constitute an act of copyright violation. In the process of imitating other people's works, if there are original elements such as new storylines, character creation, worldview, etc., then this imitation can be regarded as a creative act that does not violate copyright. However, if you simply copy, paste, adapt, or translate someone else's work without any original creation, then this behavior may constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the copyrights of the imitated work have been obtained by others, then copying, adapting, or translating the work again will also constitute copyright violation. Therefore, when imitating other people's works, one should pay attention to whether there are original elements and strictly abide by the relevant provisions of the copyright law.
Using a famous comic as a prototype, drawing it yourself and then publishing it, will it violate copyright?
Using a famous manga as a prototype for creation and distribution may violate copyright. This was because, according to the copyright law, without the permission of the copyright owner, no one could copy, distribute, display, perform, play, adapt, translate, or use the content of a famous comic to create. If you use a famous comic as a prototype and do not obtain the permission of the copyright owner, it may constitute a copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, it is recommended to understand the relevant copyright laws before creating and try to obtain the permission of the copyright owner or use the content of famous comics in other legal ways.
Will the article that references other people's works violate the copyright of others?
Generally speaking, the use of other people's works in an article would not violate the copyright of others. However, if the cited works have been granted public copyright or have become public knowledge resources, then the use of works may constitute an act of copyright violation. In addition, if you modify, translate, or continue to write other people's works when you quote them, it may also lead to copyright issues. In order to avoid the problem of copyright, it is recommended to ensure that the source of the cited content is legal and the source is indicated. In addition, the relevant provisions of the copyright law should also be strictly adhered to in the creative process to avoid any acts of copyright violation.
If he wrote some doujinshi, such as Luo Tianyi's doujinshi, would it cause copyright plagiarism?
Writing doujinshi involves copyright issues. If you convert other people's music works, characters, storylines, etc. into your own creation without authorization, it may cause copyright theft. In order to prevent this from happening, you need to pay attention to the following things when writing doujinshi: 1. Respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not convert without authorization. 2. When creating, you need to indicate the source, including the author, the title of the work, etc. to avoid confusion. 3. To avoid using other people's characters, musical works, and other elements, you need to create and adapt them yourself. If you need to use other people's music works and other elements, you need to obtain authorization and pay the copyright fee. 5. Do not violate other people's personal rights, reputation rights, and other rights during the creation process. If you are worried about copyright issues, it is recommended to consult professionals before creating and abide by relevant laws and regulations.