After the novel was signed, the copyright usually belonged to the author himself or his authorized agent. On most online novel platforms, the author had to sign a contract with the platform to own the copyright and then license it to the platform for management, distribution, and promotion. However, the specific copyright ownership may vary depending on the platform, country or region. Therefore, when signing a contract for online novels, it was recommended to carefully read the relevant terms to ensure that the rights and interests were fully protected.
There were different situations regarding the ownership of the copyright after the novel was signed. According to the content of documents [2],[5], and [6], if the author signed a contract with the novel platform, the copyright of the novel would belong to the platform under normal circumstances. The author would only retain the right of signature. This meant that the platform had the right to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, while the author usually only received a certain percentage of the profits. However, according to the content of document [8], the specific copyright ownership still needs to be determined according to the specific provisions of the contract. There may be differences between different platforms and contracts. Therefore, the ownership of the copyright of the novel after signing the contract needed to be determined according to the specific content of the contract.
The ownership of the copyright of Qidian's contracted works couldn't be treated as the same. It depended on the specific contents of the contract. Under normal circumstances, according to the laws of our country, the author automatically obtained copyright protection from the date of completion of the creation of the work. If an author signed a contract with Qidian, the copyright might be split equally with the website. For example, there might be a 50 - 50 split. There were also cases where the website signed a contract with the author. Most of the copyright would belong to the author, and the website would obtain exclusive rights for a certain period of time (such as five years, ten years, or even twenty years). However, in the past, Qidian Chinese Network had signed a contract with the author and the copyright belonged to Qidian. Therefore, the specific copyright ownership depended on the terms of the contract.
This statement was not accurate. Other than Jinjiang, when other well-known novel platforms signed contracts, the copyright might belong to the platform, but not for life. It might be a ten or twenty year ownership system. After the period, the copyright would return to the author. After Jinjiang signed the contract, the copyright would belong to the author for life. Therefore, it couldn't be said that a novel had no copyright after signing a contract. The ownership of the copyright mainly depended on the specific content of the contract signed with the platform.
According to the provisions of China's copyright law, the copyright of the translation belongs to the translator. However, when the translator exercises the copyright in the translated work, he must not damage the copyright of the original author. In the case where the copyright owner of the original work translated the work himself, the copyright owner of the original work and the copyright owner of the translated work were the same person. Translated as: Palace of Pleasure, the novel is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
The copyright of Joy of Life was owned by Xin Li Media. To be more specific, the producer, Xin Li Media, owned the copyright of the novel.
The copyright of Joy of Life was owned by Xin Li Media. To be more specific, the producer, Xin Li Media, owned the copyright of the novel.
The copyright of a movie usually belonged to the author of the novel or the copyright owner, who was the author of the novel. If the author of the novel was independent, the copyright belonged to the author himself. If the novel was written by multiple authors, the copyright could be shared by all the authors or by some of the authors alone. If the novel was adapted into a movie or TV series, the copyright would usually be transferred along with it. However, during the filming of a movie or TV series, there may be some disputes over the ownership of the copyright. The specific situation needs to be judged according to the specific situation.
The copyright of a movie usually belonged to the author of the novel or the copyright owner, who was the author of the novel. If the author of the novel was an independent individual, then the copyright belonged to that individual. If a novel is authorized by a company, organization, or individual to a certain person, the copyright may belong to the authorized party, the author, or one or more of the co-authors. If a novel was used as a screenplay during the filming of a movie, the copyright may be transferred to the film production company or other copyright owners along with the copyright of the screenplay. If the film production company successfully adapted the novel into a movie and obtained the copyright, the copyright may belong to the film production company or other copyright owners. The specific situation may vary according to the laws and regulations of different countries and regions. Therefore, when adapting a novel into a movie, it was recommended to first understand the legal provisions of the relevant countries and regions to avoid copyright disputes.
Other than Jinjiang, the copyrights of other well-known novel platforms might belong to the platform, but it might not necessarily be a lifetime ownership. It might be a ten or twenty year ownership system, and the copyright would return to the author once the time was over. Jinjiang's copyright would belong to the author for life. However, this depended on the specific content of the contract when the work was signed with the platform.
At present, China's copyright law has no clear provisions on the protection of AI products. The copyright of AI generated content belongs to the developer of AI technology or the actual user. There is still a dispute, waiting for clear guidance from the legal and policy levels. Judging from the existing litigation cases at home and abroad, the most commonly thought of judgments had appeared. The copyright belonged to the creator, the big model (that is, the copyright could not be granted), and the party who trained the big model. The executive vice president and director general of the China Character copyright association believed that artificial intelligence products without deep human participation should not have copyright; if people input subjective ideas and generate original content that reflects the subjective will of humans, they belong to the works stipulated by the copyright law and should be protected by copyright. The U.S. copyright office clearly stated in its copyright registration manual that copyright law only protected human creations, not machines or products of natural processes. If the AI works were created independently by the AI system, then these works were not protected by copyright; if the AI works were created under the guidance and control of humans, then the copyright of these works should belong to humans. For example, in 2016, an artist used AI to create a novel. Because he guided and controlled the programming and operation of the AI system, the copyright of the novel belonged to him.