After the novel was signed, the copyright usually belonged to the author himself or his authorized agent. On most online novel platforms, the author had to sign a contract with the platform to own the copyright and then license it to the platform for management, distribution, and promotion. However, the specific copyright ownership may vary depending on the platform, country or region. Therefore, when signing a contract for online novels, it was recommended to carefully read the relevant terms to ensure that the rights and interests were fully protected.
There were different situations regarding the ownership of the copyright after the novel was signed. According to the content of documents [2],[5], and [6], if the author signed a contract with the novel platform, the copyright of the novel would belong to the platform under normal circumstances. The author would only retain the right of signature. This meant that the platform had the right to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, while the author usually only received a certain percentage of the profits. However, according to the content of document [8], the specific copyright ownership still needs to be determined according to the specific provisions of the contract. There may be differences between different platforms and contracts. Therefore, the ownership of the copyright of the novel after signing the contract needed to be determined according to the specific content of the contract.
According to the provisions of China's copyright law, the copyright of the translation belongs to the translator. However, when the translator exercises the copyright in the translated work, he must not damage the copyright of the original author. In the case where the copyright owner of the original work translated the work himself, the copyright owner of the original work and the copyright owner of the translated work were the same person. Translated as: Palace of Pleasure, the novel is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
The copyright of Joy of Life was owned by Xin Li Media. To be more specific, the producer, Xin Li Media, owned the copyright of the novel.
The copyright of Joy of Life was owned by Xin Li Media. To be more specific, the producer, Xin Li Media, owned the copyright of the novel.
The copyright of a movie usually belonged to the author of the novel or the copyright owner, who was the author of the novel. If the author of the novel was independent, the copyright belonged to the author himself. If the novel was written by multiple authors, the copyright could be shared by all the authors or by some of the authors alone. If the novel was adapted into a movie or TV series, the copyright would usually be transferred along with it. However, during the filming of a movie or TV series, there may be some disputes over the ownership of the copyright. The specific situation needs to be judged according to the specific situation.
The copyright of a movie usually belonged to the author of the novel or the copyright owner, who was the author of the novel. If the author of the novel was an independent individual, then the copyright belonged to that individual. If a novel is authorized by a company, organization, or individual to a certain person, the copyright may belong to the authorized party, the author, or one or more of the co-authors. If a novel was used as a screenplay during the filming of a movie, the copyright may be transferred to the film production company or other copyright owners along with the copyright of the screenplay. If the film production company successfully adapted the novel into a movie and obtained the copyright, the copyright may belong to the film production company or other copyright owners. The specific situation may vary according to the laws and regulations of different countries and regions. Therefore, when adapting a novel into a movie, it was recommended to first understand the legal provisions of the relevant countries and regions to avoid copyright disputes.
If it was a novel created by Kimi-ai, since Kimi-ai was an artificial intelligence, it did not have the rights that human creators had. Therefore, the copyright of the novel created by Kimi-ai was more complicated. In China, according to the provisions of the copyright law, works created by natural people could become authors in the sense of copyright law and thus enjoy copyright. If the content was created by artificial intelligence, it was not considered a copyright-eligible work. However, if it was a novel that used Kimi-ai to assist human creation, then the copyright belonged to the human creator as long as the legal composition of the work was met. However, the specifics still depended on factors such as the agreement with the relevant platform or partner, because it might involve the relevant terms of the use of Kimi-ai, whether there were special usage restrictions or sharing copyrights.
At present, there was a dispute over the copyright of novels written by AI. In China, the copyright law has no clear provisions on the protection of AI products. If the content generated by AI was deemed to be original, and the subjective thoughts were artificially input to generate original content that reflected the subjective will of humans, it would belong to the works stipulated by the copyright law and should be protected by copyright. However, the specific copyright ownership and scope of protection still needed to be further clarified at the legal and policy level. From a different point of view, artificial intelligence products without deep human participation should not have copyright; if there was deep human participation, for example, in the creation process, there were humans who controlled the quality and integrity of the story, some people believed that the human creator was still the owner of the copyright. In a case in the United States, if the participation of humans in the AI creation process was below the standard, the overall work was not protected by copyright. The creativity of the work needed to be controlled by humans, and the human artist had to choose or arrange the materials generated by the AI in a creative way. In China, there have been cases where the court ruled that the article generated by AI constituted a work and was protected by copyright law. However, in general, the copyright of the novel written by AI was not completely clear. When the creator used AI to assist in the creation, he should keep a record of the process from creativity to writing and modification to avoid copyright disputes. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
At present, China's copyright law has no clear provisions on the protection of AI products. The copyright of AI generated content belongs to the developer of AI technology or the actual user. There is still a dispute, waiting for clear guidance from the legal and policy levels. Judging from the existing litigation cases at home and abroad, the most commonly thought of judgments had appeared. The copyright belonged to the creator, the big model (that is, the copyright could not be granted), and the party who trained the big model. The executive vice president and director general of the China Character copyright association believed that artificial intelligence products without deep human participation should not have copyright; if people input subjective ideas and generate original content that reflects the subjective will of humans, they belong to the works stipulated by the copyright law and should be protected by copyright. The U.S. copyright office clearly stated in its copyright registration manual that copyright law only protected human creations, not machines or products of natural processes. If the AI works were created independently by the AI system, then these works were not protected by copyright; if the AI works were created under the guidance and control of humans, then the copyright of these works should belong to humans. For example, in 2016, an artist used AI to create a novel. Because he guided and controlled the programming and operation of the AI system, the copyright of the novel belonged to him.
Other than Jinjiang, the copyrights of other well-known novel platforms might belong to the platform, but it might not necessarily be a lifetime ownership. It might be a ten or twenty year ownership system, and the copyright would return to the author once the time was over. Jinjiang's copyright would belong to the author for life. However, this depended on the specific content of the contract when the work was signed with the platform.