Lu Xun's literary criticism advocated against the criticism of facts and metaphysics. Fact-based criticism refers to a specific analysis and description of the shortcomings or shortcomings of a specific work or character, not involving the overall evaluation of the work or character. Metaphysical criticism, on the other hand, refers to the general evaluation of works or characters from one-sided and isolated problems without specific analysis and practical basis. Lu Xun believed that the matter-of-fact-style criticism was easy to fall into trivial details and could not dig into the inner meaning and value of the works; while the metaphysical criticism was easy to ignore the overall background and context of the works or characters, resulting in a one-sided understanding and evaluation of the works or characters. Therefore, Lu Xun advocated a comprehensive, comprehensive, and in-depth criticism of works or characters, opposing a single, partial criticism.
Lu Xun was one of the important representatives of modern Chinese literature. He fully realized the importance of literary criticism and vigorously emphasized literary form criticism. He believed that the form and structure of literary works were their essential characteristics and the embodiment of literary value. In Lu Xun's literary criticism, he emphasized the form and structure of the novel, such as the plot, the creation of characters, the use of language, etc. He believed that these form elements could affect the readers 'acceptance and feelings, thus determining the value and significance of the novel. Lu Xun's literary criticism played an important role in the development and promotion of modern Chinese literature.
Lu Xun (September 25, 1881-October 19, 1936) was one of the most important figures in modern Chinese literature and cultural history. His literary works and ideas had a profound impact on modern Chinese literature and culture. Lu Xun's literary criticism mainly included the following aspects: 1. Criticizing the novel: Lu Xun believed that the novel was a literary form that exposed the social reality. He criticized the eulogizing descriptions and false plots of some novels at that time, emphasizing that the novel should reveal the dark side of society with true and vivid descriptions. 2. Criticizing poetry: Lu Xun believed that poetry was a literary form that expressed emotions and thoughts. He criticized the mediocrity and lack of depth of some poems at that time, emphasizing that poetry should reveal social reality with profound thoughts and feelings. 3. Criticizing prose: Lu Xun believed that prose was a free and casual literary form. He criticized the standardized and stylized prose at that time, emphasizing that prose should express thoughts and emotions in a free and casual style. 4. Criticizing the theory of literature and art: Lu Xun advocated that literature and art should be a spirit of realism and humanism. He criticized the hypocrisy and narrow-mindedness of some literary theories at that time and emphasized that literature and art should pay attention to social reality and human destiny. Lu Xun's literary criticism reflected his deep understanding and concern for the form and spirit of literature and art, which had a profound impact on the development of modern Chinese literature and culture.
Literature criticism and literary criticism were both ways of evaluating and analyzing literary works, but the focus and perspective were slightly different. Literature criticism refers to the subjective evaluation and analysis of literary works, mainly focusing on the characteristics and contents of literary works in terms of ideology, art, culture, etc., emphasizing the interpretation and understanding of the works themselves. Critists would use various methods such as reading, thinking, discussion, and analysis to conduct in-depth exploration and evaluation of works. Literature criticism, on the other hand, paid more attention to the analysis of the social, historical, and cultural background of literary works, as well as the author's intention, purpose, and creative process. The criticism mainly focused on the meaning, value, and influence of the work, emphasizing the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the era, society, history, and culture. Critiques tended to focus on being objective and fair, avoiding the interference of subjective colors. Therefore, the main difference between literary criticism and literary criticism lies in the focus of evaluation and analysis. One is the interpretation and understanding of the work itself, and the other is the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the times, society, and culture.
Literature criticism is a literary activity that reviews and analyses literary works, usually including their content, form, style, theme, symbolism, and language techniques, and exploring the social, cultural, and political impacts of these works. The purpose of literary criticism is to help readers better understand literary works and to discover and appreciate the beauty and meaning in literary works.
A literary review was a type of literary criticism that was an analysis of literary works. Literature criticism would usually focus on a particular literary work or discuss its literary style, theme, structure, language, and other characteristics and advantages. The purpose of literary criticism is to let readers better understand literary works and promote the development and prosperity of literature.
Character analysis can be regarded as a method of literary criticism. In literary works, the image of a character is one of the most important factors that make up a work. It plays a vital role in readers 'understanding and experience of the work. Therefore, the analysis and study of the characters can help us better understand the content and characteristics of the works, and then carry out more in-depth criticism and analysis of the works. The analysis of character image was a kind of image criticism. Image criticism is a kind of criticism method that focuses on the image and reveals the theme, emotion and ideology of the work through the study and analysis of the image. In image criticism, the analysis of the characters is an important part. Through the analysis of the characters in the works, we can better understand the theme and emotions of the works and reveal the internal logic and structural relationship of the works. The analysis of character images can be regarded as an important part of image criticism, which can help us better understand literary works. However, it should be noted that character image analysis is not an omnipotent criticism method. It is only an auxiliary means that needs to be combined with other criticism methods to carry out comprehensive analysis and evaluation.
A literary review was an article that commented and evaluated literary works. Literature criticism usually analyzed and discussed specific works from multiple perspectives to help readers better understand and appreciate the meaning and extension of the works. The main purpose of literary criticism is to provide readers with useful information and enlightenment and to promote the understanding and appreciation of literary works. That's right. The reviews would usually discuss the background, style, theme, and plot of the work to understand it. The comments could also be used to judge the pros and cons and value. Both literary criticism and criticism are used to analyze and discuss literary works and to provide readers with useful information and enlightenment to promote the understanding and appreciation of literary works.
Literature criticism referred to the process of evaluating and criticizing literary works. The standards mainly include the following aspects: 1. aesthetic standards: literary critics need to evaluate and criticize the artistic value and aesthetic value of literary works according to the readers 'aesthetic tastes and cultural background. 2. Depth of Thought: A literary critic needs to make an in-depth evaluation and criticism of the thoughts, emotions, and values expressed in a literary work to judge the meaning and extension of the work. 3. Language skills: A literary critic needs to evaluate and criticize the language, rhetorical devices, and style of a literary work to judge the literary level and artistic value of the work. 4. Achievement and influence: literary critics need to evaluate and criticize the historical status and influence of literary works to judge the status and value of works in the history of literature. 5. Reader's response: A literary critic needs to evaluate and criticize the reader's response and acceptance of a literary work to determine the value and status of the work in the reader's heart. The standard of literary criticism was multi-dimensional. It needed to consider the internal and external factors of the work to judge the artistic value and literary value of the work.
The thinking of literary criticism refers to the way of thinking and analytical methods used by literary critics to evaluate literary works. The following are some of the characteristics of literary criticism: 1. System: When literary critics criticize, they usually evaluate the whole work and analyze it from multiple angles to form a systematic analysis framework. 2. Criticality: When evaluating a work, literary critics must not only affirm its merits but also point out its shortcomings and shortcomings, and analyze and criticize them. 3. Historicity: When literary critics criticized, they would usually consider the background of the era and social background of the work and analyze its influence on later generations. 4. Culturality: When evaluating a work, literary critics should not only take into account the content of the work itself, but also take into account the cultural environment and cultural background reflected by the work and carry out cultural thinking and evaluation. 5. Pluralism: When literary critics criticize, they usually use a variety of analytical methods and perspectives to broaden their vision of the work. 6. Subjectivity: When literary critics criticize, they usually have a certain degree of subjective evaluation based on personal preferences and aesthetic concepts. The thinking of literary criticism is systematic, critical, historical, cultural, pluralistic, subjective and so on. It can help readers better understand the meaning and extension of literary works and promote the development and progress of literature.
The Corner of Altay was a collection of essays by Li Juan, first published in June 2010. This book recorded the life story of the author's family who ran a grocery store and tailor shop in the Altay Mountains in a natural tone. The author used simple and rustic language to describe the simple and natural scenery and human feelings of the Altay Prefecture in the northern border. Through reading this book, readers could feel the author's love for Altay and his unique views on life. This book won the praise of readers with its beautiful writing and realistic descriptions.