Which normal, non-brainless, and truly beautiful romance novels could he recommend?

Recently, she had started reading romance novels. After watching a few movies, he felt that the difference between good and bad was too big. Let's talk about the bad first (good later):
1.She was delicate, pretentious, and extremely childish.
2.Too much. What I meant was that the character had gone overboard. In order to highlight the domineering character of the male or female lead (including being two-faced and being "clever"), the main character would bully the supporting character or bully the other party. He even treated this act of ignoring the feelings of others as a manifestation of the protagonist's black-bellied and naivety. As for those who were bullied, they didn't complain. They even said that "love must learn to be tolerant." Please, love is to tolerate and let go of ridiculous self-esteem, but please don't create a soft egg without dignity, bones, and flesh. Dignity only yielded to love, not submission. Could it be that the author was provoked in reality and wrote such things to entertain himself? Don't send me words of self-entertainment. This is a blasphemy against true love and a blasphemy against personality.
(At first, I thought I was being too radical. But after reading the real beautiful article, I realized that there was a world of difference between the good and bad descriptions of the same character.)
3.It was inexplicably strange. That's right, it was inexplicable! There was a book in which the female protagonist got engaged less than a second after meeting the male protagonist. The funny thing was that she was still very persistent about this engagement. Ridiculous. Love could burst out in an instant. However, since it was a romance novel, it needed details, psychology, and the environment. Your love burst forth, but our readers didn't. Without enough support, how could we capture the moment of love and show it to the readers? Most of the messy and inexplicable things were without details and abrupt.
The difference was really bad. Some people said that romance novels were real. He understood.
Apart from the bad ones, those were really beautiful.
1.It was like a flash in the pan. Love was vigorous and vigorous, and when this kind of love was written on paper, it was truly touching. Often, a few short sentences combined into a few short sentences could hold people's hearts for a long time. The author's grasp of emotion and scenery had reached the extreme. When the water was ripe, feelings would naturally drive it.
2.A faint eternity. These kinds of articles were all about the trivial things in life. There was no storm. When he saw the ending, a feeling of beauty and love rose leisurely. He had a feeling even without watching it once. She felt that there was a faint but long-lasting warm love everywhere. The male and female protagonists were not the kind who loved each other to the point of death. Basically, the man did not dominate the woman, and the woman did not abuse the man. It was all heartwarming. This kind of article is really beautiful. Some of the little white articles that are despised on the Internet are written by authors who want to write this but fail. I'm looking forward to the birth of beautiful articles. Male. I haven't been able to find many books like this so far. I looked for articles about the male protagonist's gentleness on the Internet and found that the female protagonist was a bully. On the contrary, the male protagonist was so cold that I wanted to beat him up. Anger! Even if they tried their best to find it, they would still be so angry that they would vomit blood. So I request to recommend a few of these types of books. It doesn't matter if they are famous works in the early days. Please tell me.
3."Sadistic text." I'm not talking about the story where the female protagonist abuses the male protagonist or the male protagonist abuses the female protagonist, and then the two of them inexplicably fall in love with each other. I'm talking about the kind that has true love, the kind that has twists and turns. The ending might not be good. It was very piercing. It was not as simple as trying to trick her tears. She clearly had the thought of 'if only...' However, he felt that the ending of the original text could not be changed. Changing it would be a flaw.
In conclusion, I recommend a good article.
PS: I will wait for the full 15 days. So don't answer randomly.
It seems like I've been misunderstood. I don't hate the female lead for being brainless, I just hate the phenomenon of brainlessness. Some male protagonists were also brainless (I want to slap him to death after watching it>,<). I definitely don't object to the female protagonist being strong, but the character must have flesh and blood and principles. Being strong doesn't mean being arrogant. I think being strong, tenacious, principled, and neither arrogant nor humble can be said to be strong. I'll go and take a look at what everyone recommended. thanks

Answer 1

I recommend the two ancient romance novels, Dream of the Jade Lake and The Way of the Official Concubine. "The Dream of the Jade Lake" was a love story about a woman who had transmigrated to a virtual dynasty. It involved characters of different identities and forces, and the plot was rigorous and compact. "The Way of the Official Concubine" focused on a couple in the struggle of the official world. The man and the woman were strong and had a deep relationship. They fought against villains and evil officials together and went through all kinds of emotional and secular tests. I hope you like this fairy's recommendation. Muah ~😗