1. Writing quality is bearable. 2. Story development is very forced. Every passive skills become useful with no setup in the next sentence. He would be peaceful for 3 months, gain a battle skill, and a conflict will arrise out of nowhere in the next sentence. 3. The MC is dumb. Sometimes having a dumb MC can be fun in a comedy. The problem is that this story tries to be dark. This makes the MC just frustrating. The only reason he can survive even a single day is that he got lucky and has a system. Worst of all, the MC is arrogant and thinks that he is smart while making the dumbest actions and statements. 4. Not sure about stability so I gave it a 3 as a middle value. 5. The background is terrible. The sect makes no sense and the rules the author introduces gets broken in the next. He does try to think of a "fresh" twist to a sect so I give 2 stars for effort. The problem is that some archetypes are there for a reason. Sometimes that is just an inevitable outcome of logical progression. An example of this would be greedy and selfish people always being in power as the antagonist. This is inevitable when only those that are greefy and selfish can climb over others to gain the wealth and power they have. Once you try to subvert expectations and break archetypes, it instead just breaks logic. So good attempt but poor execution. Overall it was a poorly executed story with an interesting premise. I would not recommend.
Liked by 14 people
LIKENo offense, but you really need help. You saw someone post a very negative review about a book, and decided to tell them to reread it. When they ask why, you literally have no reason. I am just wondering how you function in the real world. To answer your question, no, there was nothing obvious about what you said. There was not even a hint of logic at all.
GrandVoid:Because we dont know, and you could find out. Seems pretty obvious to me.
Tell me. Which other reasons are there to reread a novel? And im doing fine irl thank you.
INnOUT:No offense, but you really need help. You saw someone post a very negative review about a book, and decided to tell them to reread it. When they ask why, you literally have no reason. I am just wondering how you function in the real world. To answer your question, no, there was nothing obvious about what you said. There was not even a hint of logic at all.