Is it necessary to cater to others to fit in?There was no need to pander to others to fit in.
From a psychological perspective, many people felt that they had to integrate into the team and get along with everyone in the workplace to work smoothly, but giving up their principles in order to get along with others would make them tired and even tired. For example, some colleagues didn't like a certain project, but because everyone was working on it, they had to join. This kind of teamwork would only bring negative effects.
From the perspective of social pressure, if you meet colleagues with different interests and values in the office, if you force yourself to participate in activities in order to get along, it will only be more and more awkward. You will also be forced by social pressure to cater to others. Moreover, the price to pay for getting along with others was not small. Always pandering would be seen as a " nice guy ", and one's own opinions would be easily ignored.
In terms of the nature of gregariousness, the standards of gregariousness were set by others, and people had the right to choose not to follow them. Groups were often not good at reasoning and did not like to seek the truth. They were only eager to achieve results. If they wanted to get along with the outside world, they would unconsciously change themselves and lose their independence. For example, a miser would become a spendthrift in order to fit in, and a coward would become a superhero in order to fit in. These were all unreasonable changes. Moreover, pandering to one party in the group might offend the other party, and pandering to the left and right would make people feel at a loss.
In addition, being social was sometimes just an illusory feeling. Some people were social in order to obtain an illusory " sense of security," but truly capable people would not give up their own values to cater to them. They could maintain their independent personality and opinions, and maintain independent thinking without hurting others. Moreover, from the perspective of interests, there was a " value " relationship in the group. If there was no value in the group or the price paid was greater than the benefits gained, they would be excluded or voluntarily withdraw.
Therefore, he didn't need to pander to others to fit in. He just needed to be himself.
The story of one person and a group of people is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
She began to slowly cater to the childShe began to slow down, accompany the child gently, communicate with the child in a gentle tone, and not be in a hurry for the child to respond immediately. She patiently hummed a song and slowly shook the child to calm him down. When feeding, she also learned to gently stroke the child's hair to let the child feel love. This method could make the child feel at ease and happy.
She began to slowly cater to the childShe began to slowly cater to the child. It meant that a mother adopted a gentle and patient way to accompany her child in the process of raising the child. She found that if she slowed down and gently communicated with the child, she would not be in a hurry for the child to respond immediately. The child would be more at ease and happy. She learned to patiently hum a song and slowly shake the child until the child quieted down. When feeding, she also learned to gently stroke the child's hair to make the child feel warm and safe. This gentle and patient way of raising children was very important for their growth and development.
Nice story. Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song Lyrics of a song