webnovel
Thumidu_Shenuka
Thumidu_ShenukaLv17mth
2024-09-23 16:42

It is not realistic to think that human even in the united navy will think equally about animal looking people. And the character development of the mc is unrealistic. In the war of liberation the team led by Campbell killed the war master one time but somehow he magically resurrected. And especially mc shouldn't teach people who living in this world their military knowledge(mc is dumb for doing that). They could realistically turn against him one day so he should have more cards up his sleeve. And what man doesn't like harem(bulls#it).

Liked it!

LIKE
Replies15
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

Im complety sure that most of men dont like harem, for one reason we are a monogamy society

Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

Trust me they all do. Loyalist men cab love one woman rest of his life and live happily and they won't go out of their way to pursue other women but if his first wide is okay fully with his taking another woman they will take other women. 2 is better than 1 anyway.

Andy_Torres_2396:Im complety sure that most of men dont like harem, for one reason we are a monogamy society
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

Believe you? Haha you are talking a lot of nonsense and you tell me that haha. How immature you have to be to say that, as well as illogical. If a person with the morals to go after other women depending on the situation, do you think he would care about someone's permission to do so? Do you think someone like that could be faithful? That is totally contradictory to the concept of fidelity. If a man is faithful to anything it is because he decides so himself. Most men like monogamy, there is a reason why the structure evolved and was established in such a way. It still doesn't change the fact that psychologically we feel much better having just one partner.

Thumiya:Trust me they all do. Loyalist men cab love one woman rest of his life and live happily and they won't go out of their way to pursue other women but if his first wide is okay fully with his taking another woman they will take other women. 2 is better than 1 anyway.
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

Are two wives better than one? Here we are not talking about group work but about another type of relationship, here it is not one plus one equals two, rather it is subtracted. It subtracts many things, trust, love, self-esteem, peace, most importantly: morality... Furthermore, for what or who is that better? Simply considering the amount for the object of satisfaction makes the issue superficial and therefore worse.

Thumiya:Trust me they all do. Loyalist men cab love one woman rest of his life and live happily and they won't go out of their way to pursue other women but if his first wide is okay fully with his taking another woman they will take other women. 2 is better than 1 anyway.
Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

you are delusional if you think most men like monogamy. Sure,there might be a like 5 percent of the whole population who likes monogamy but if every consequences is removed and they would definitely like polygamy. 90 percent of the men would like a polygamy relationship but if the person himself think that one woman he can live with that. I am not immature you a4e immature for thinking men don't like polygamy.

Andy_Torres_2396:Believe you? Haha you are talking a lot of nonsense and you tell me that haha. How immature you have to be to say that, as well as illogical. If a person with the morals to go after other women depending on the situation, do you think he would care about someone's permission to do so? Do you think someone like that could be faithful? That is totally contradictory to the concept of fidelity. If a man is faithful to anything it is because he decides so himself. Most men like monogamy, there is a reason why the structure evolved and was established in such a way. It still doesn't change the fact that psychologically we feel much better having just one partner.
Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

I am talking when both wives agree to the cause of polygamy. In reality it is impossible to have that kind of relationship without internal conflicts but that doesn't change the fact most men like polygamy relationship if there is no consequences.

Andy_Torres_2396:Are two wives better than one? Here we are not talking about group work but about another type of relationship, here it is not one plus one equals two, rather it is subtracted. It subtracts many things, trust, love, self-esteem, peace, most importantly: morality... Furthermore, for what or who is that better? Simply considering the amount for the object of satisfaction makes the issue superficial and therefore worse.
Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

I never said people can thrive when they are in a polygamy relationship. I said men like harem if they can get it.

Andy_Torres_2396:Are two wives better than one? Here we are not talking about group work but about another type of relationship, here it is not one plus one equals two, rather it is subtracted. It subtracts many things, trust, love, self-esteem, peace, most importantly: morality... Furthermore, for what or who is that better? Simply considering the amount for the object of satisfaction makes the issue superficial and therefore worse.
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

When did I say that you said that? I am responding to what you said: two wives or women are better than one.

Thumiya:I never said people can thrive when they are in a polygamy relationship. I said men like harem if they can get it.
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

I'm not assuming anything, you are, the majority like monogamous relationships that's why the majority of modern and even ancient society evolved in monogamous relationships. I speak of the fact that you speak with an authority that you do not have, assuming what men like and what would happen in x situation. Furthermore, precisely because of those consequences that you talk about, they would also be a reason why men like monogamous relationships. So I don't see logic, anyone likes many things because it can imply fewer consequences of something. Nor can it be said that if they are eliminated because it is inherent to the idea, otherwise it would not be as such.

Thumiya:you are delusional if you think most men like monogamy. Sure,there might be a like 5 percent of the whole population who likes monogamy but if every consequences is removed and they would definitely like polygamy. 90 percent of the men would like a polygamy relationship but if the person himself think that one woman he can live with that. I am not immature you a4e immature for thinking men don't like polygamy.
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

You are committing a contradiction, in fact if you change the fact that because of the problems or anything "causal and inherent" to what a polygamous relationship implies, men do not like polygamous relationships. For those same reasons, someone may not like to eat a lot, because it makes them gain weight. And gaining weight is a fact of eating a lot for that person. Or a person who doesn't like football because it tires their legs. Let's now imagine something directly causal in consequences like the problems of polygamous relationships, of which there are many. So to eliminate the consequences, then we would no longer be talking about polygamous relationships. Because to eliminate the consequences you have to remove the cause and the cause is the polygamous relationships themselves.

Thumiya:I am talking when both wives agree to the cause of polygamy. In reality it is impossible to have that kind of relationship without internal conflicts but that doesn't change the fact most men like polygamy relationship if there is no consequences.
Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

no they don't like it. From the ancient times they didn't like they had to do it only men or women with certain high status and power over the tradition or people who were never under that kinds of traditio could manipulate it to having more partners. They didn't like it especially men otherwise there won't be so many cheating on the side from both partners. Men had to do it because that was the law and culture and defying things like that had severe punishments throught the times and women had to do it because of safety and survival especially when they are pregnant. Polygamy relationship is very hard to manage and it is full of problems but majority of men will like a polygamy relationship when there are no problems.

Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

Bro, didn't you read anything I wrote to you? It doesn't make sense to say that you like it but if it were without problems. Because those problems are what make them not exactly like it, I already explained this to you... These problems are inherent, they are not causes that can be separated from the fact, the problems cannot be removed because it would have to stop being what the issue is then. As I already told you, someone doesn't like something precisely because of the problems with that something. And infidelity is not the same as polygamous relationships, a man who is unfaithful does not mean that he likes polygamy at all. On the other hand, why do you talk about culture and society as if they had been configured from nothing? That's why I tell you that people don't like polygamous relationships, that's why we configure society and maintain it that way. That's why society (we) live in such a way. It is the morality that we have engraved in our minds and that is why we move forward to adjust a society with monogamous relationships and in that way it becomes more prosperous. On a psychological level we are also much better that way.

Thumiya:no they don't like it. From the ancient times they didn't like they had to do it only men or women with certain high status and power over the tradition or people who were never under that kinds of traditio could manipulate it to having more partners. They didn't like it especially men otherwise there won't be so many cheating on the side from both partners. Men had to do it because that was the law and culture and defying things like that had severe punishments throught the times and women had to do it because of safety and survival especially when they are pregnant. Polygamy relationship is very hard to manage and it is full of problems but majority of men will like a polygamy relationship when there are no problems.
Thumiya
ThumiyaLv3

no It is not the same thing it is two different things. For example,someone stopped eating fast food(after a long time) because he wants to lose weight. Does that mean he doesn't like fast food? He does that out of necessity and because he wants a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean they don't like fastfood that m that ans because of the conseque, ces they are rejecting the food. Same can be applied to here. most of the men would love to have a harem but risks are high for that kind of relationship. But when people started to use that kind of morals in novels, it irritates me when people use these morals here because entertainment are supposed give you an escape from the reality( even now that is the main purpose eventhough Some value realism now).

Andy_Torres_2396:You are committing a contradiction, in fact if you change the fact that because of the problems or anything "causal and inherent" to what a polygamous relationship implies, men do not like polygamous relationships. For those same reasons, someone may not like to eat a lot, because it makes them gain weight. And gaining weight is a fact of eating a lot for that person. Or a person who doesn't like football because it tires their legs. Let's now imagine something directly causal in consequences like the problems of polygamous relationships, of which there are many. So to eliminate the consequences, then we would no longer be talking about polygamous relationships. Because to eliminate the consequences you have to remove the cause and the cause is the polygamous relationships themselves.
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

Let's see, I used examples linked to the cause and I even told you that the consequences and problems are inherent to the fact in polygamous relationships. You are using a fallacy of example and association. Here we are talking from the perspective that someone does not like something because of its causes and consequences, that is why I said that someone cannot like to eat a lot because it can make them gain weight. Not the other way around. That is for even those examples that, as you see, are not necessarily inherent issues like your example of hamburgers, but as I said, what I said is already something inherent to the cause. Furthermore, someone cannot precisely like eating hamburgers because it can make them gain weight, it is not the same as liking hamburgers. I may like to eat vegetables because they improve my condition but I may not like vegetables. The fact is that you may or may not like something for reasons. That's for non-inherent causes. Now with polygamous relationships, if you remove the problem of polygamous relationships, they would have to stop being polygamous. Polygamous relationships are the problem and the consequence of monogamous relationships. Its consequences are inherent.

Thumiya:no It is not the same thing it is two different things. For example,someone stopped eating fast food(after a long time) because he wants to lose weight. Does that mean he doesn't like fast food? He does that out of necessity and because he wants a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean they don't like fastfood that m that ans because of the conseque, ces they are rejecting the food. Same can be applied to here. most of the men would love to have a harem but risks are high for that kind of relationship. But when people started to use that kind of morals in novels, it irritates me when people use these morals here because entertainment are supposed give you an escape from the reality( even now that is the main purpose eventhough Some value realism now).
Andy_Torres_2396
Andy_Torres_2396Lv1

An important fact to re-emphasize is that you may like things or not follow their reasons or consequences. What I was saying is not supported by anything, I said that man does not like polygamous relationships precisely because of how society (us) evolves, also because of the inherent problems that polygamous relationships imply. Which means that when you don't like polygamous relationships it is necessarily because of their problems. And you can't say that you like polygamous relationships if it weren't for the problems because it would have to stop being polygamous relationships since its problems are the natural fact in itself of polygamous relationships over monogamous relationships.

Thumiya:no It is not the same thing it is two different things. For example,someone stopped eating fast food(after a long time) because he wants to lose weight. Does that mean he doesn't like fast food? He does that out of necessity and because he wants a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean they don't like fastfood that m that ans because of the conseque, ces they are rejecting the food. Same can be applied to here. most of the men would love to have a harem but risks are high for that kind of relationship. But when people started to use that kind of morals in novels, it irritates me when people use these morals here because entertainment are supposed give you an escape from the reality( even now that is the main purpose eventhough Some value realism now).
Other Reviews
Sean_Morabito
Sean_MorabitoLv14

XBVoid
XBVoidLv15
Related Stories

Re: Evolution Online

On just another normal Monday, a new virtual reality game called "Evolution Online" launched out of nowhere and took the world by storm. People were blown away by the game’s hyper-realistic features and endless adventures. Everyone from small companies to big corporations and governments scrambled to get a foothold on this mysterious video game. But what they didn't know was that this game was actually a tutorial for the upcoming apocalypse that was about to hit the planet! The game was a precursor to the Earth's first evolution, where mana was going to be unleashed into the real world! Liam, a high school student who had faced numerous setbacks in his life, turned to 'Evolution Online' in the hope of changing his fate, but instead, he got trapped in the game's twisted world, and things went from bad to worse. When the apocalypse finally arrived, Liam barely managed to escape, but his situation didn't improve. Along with millions of others, he died a miserable death, unable to fight back and filled with regret. However, Liam's story didn't end there. He found himself inexplicably transported back in time before everything started! Armed with the knowledge of what was to come, Liam was determined to become the strongest and most powerful player, unleashing destruction upon the world that had ruined him before! This time, things were going to be different! ******************* Discord Link for chatting with author and character art https://discord.gg/XS7gWScKn8

Yolohy · Fantasy
4.8
1429 Chs

Young Master's PoV: Woke Up As A Villain In A Game One Day

"Now you see?" she shouted in a tone that was somewhere between annoyance and disappointment. "You can’t outsmart Scrients! They’re the most intelligent beings across the two realms!" "You’re right," I muttered, averting my gaze with a solemn sigh. "I made a mistake. I was arrogant to think a mere human like me could fool them." —BOOM!! "...Wh-What was that?" "Hmm? I’m not sure. Maybe you should go and ask the most intelligent beings across the two realms. Oh wait! You can’t. I killed them all." --- My name is Samael Kaizer Theosbane. On the last day of high school, I got into a fight with a kid I used to bully. It was a stupid and pointless scuffle. And in the middle of it, I tripped and smacked my head on a rock. That’s when the memories came flooding in… Memories of a different life. Memories of another world. Suddenly, everything made a twisted kind of sense. I realized two things. First: I was inside a game I used to play in my past life. Second: I was a villain. A villain! Not the cool, mysterious, tragic kind either! No, I was the worst kind of cliché — a spoiled, insufferable, and arrogant young master. The sort you'd find in those poorly written fantasy stories. You know the type! The one everyone hates. The one the hero would beat into the ground to show everyone just how strong and righteous he is. Yeah. I was that guy! My fate was to be a stepping stone for the main characters, be manipulated by a Demon Prince, and die a dog's death. And the hero? The hero was the same kid I’d been bullying all this time. The one I just got into a fight with. He was supposed to be the savior of this damned world. A world teetering on the edge of destruction, beset by wars, calamities, and a grim future that only I knew. And waiting at the end of it all was the final antagonist. The unbeatable nightmare. …The Spirit King. But could I even make it to the end? Could I really survive in a game where defeat was the only certainty? A game that had now become my reality? “Ah, fuck it.” I had no idea if I could. But I sure as hell was going to try. Extorting extras, manipulating main characters, altering the story to my advantage, stealing the hero’s cheat items, killing villains long before they could become threats — nothing was beneath me. Would the main characters be affected by my actions? Excellent! Would the story change? Even better! All I cared about was me. My survival. My life. My choices. “I’ll live this life with no regrets.” ...But as I soon discovered, fate wasn't so easily changed. And the price of rewriting your destiny was steep. ========== Discord Server: https://discord.gg/VjFQtDUaTR

The_One_Who_Was · Fantasy
4.7
199 Chs

Armipotent

This is a work of fiction, any names, characters, stories or events, are fictitious! (Even the country in the story is just the author's fantasy as the author never visited those countries in the story) Armipotent is an archaic adjective meaning "strong in battle." Basically, it refers to someone who is physically tough in war. Originally, it was used to refer to the Roman god of war, Mars. ===================== Tang Shaoyang, an orphan who dropped out of the middle school to fight on the street as he found out school was useless for a penniless orphan like him. Tang Shaoyang dropped out of his school, fighting on the street, and made a name for himself. Berserker Tang from Youyouliucun. Afterward, Dragon Wing triad recruited him and everything was good for him. Even though the public deemed him as a tumor of society, Tang Shaoyang was having a decent life. Until one day, everything changed as an absurd and strange game started. "... Game starts! Stage one: Survival for The Fittest!" After the game started, zombies appeared out of nowhere. ... Ding! "You have killed 1000 zombies less than 24 hours since the game started! You gained 3 Talents!" Dong! "You may choose 3 Talents! please choose carefully!" Tang Shaoyang held his chin and mused what Talent he had to choose. "With Zombies appear everywhere, I need an infinite strength... this is one, I still need to choose 2 Talents more..." Then a lewd smile formed on his lips. "I want an infinite strength, charm and charisma to conquer women, and the last one, I want to upgrade my **** so I can please my women!" After saying this, Tang Shaoyang laughed aloud. "Hahaha, there's no way such talent exists... ehhhhh?!!!" Ding! Dong! "3 Talents are consumed! You have been granted Divine Body! Good Luck, Gamer Tang Shaoyang!" Tang Shaoyang immediately checked the detail of Divine Body. After a brief silence, he muttered unbelievably. "Such Talents really exist..." Note: I don't own the cover. If the creator wants me to take down the cover or put credit, please notify me by replying to my review at the Review section.

HotIce · Fantasy
4.4
1934 Chs

Hunter Academy: Revenge of the Weakest

What do the words Third-Rate Villain mean? Doesn't every human being possess their own background story? Just because a game hadn't explored one's background story, does it mean those characters are irrelevant? In a world where video games come to life, Astron Natusalune is introduced as a seemingly insignificant character—a third-rate villain with a minor role. However, this ordinary facade belies a haunting past that has shaped Astron into the vengeful soul he has become. Someone who would do everything for his vengeance. What will occur if Astron's soul combines with one from Earth? Will he relinquish his position as a third-rate villain, or will he forge a new path? Driven by a singular purpose—to avenge his sister's tragic death and bring justice to a cruel world—Astron embarks on a transformative journey. Witness the journey of the Astron as the young boy experiences a profound shift in his own values as he witnesses firsthand the consequences of unchecked vengeance and the true complexities of morality. -----------------------------------0------------------------------------ Chapter length 1750-2500 At least one chapter a day. You can check my discord if you want. You will be able to see the illustrations here and engage in a conversation with me if I am available. https://discord.gg/qRknX5hTur ---------------------------0------------------------------ Business E-mail: yusuftalhayasar@outlook.com Discord: _yty_

Darkness_Enjoyer · Fantasy
4.3
1040 Chs