Of course there is the obligatory self serving author review. Let me know what you think in your own review if you feel like it or not if you don't.
Liked by 8 people
LIKENo he is an anti-villain, but there is no such tag available so it ended up with anti-villain since it’s closest.
Classified:Hey, you mixed up the definitions of anti-hero and anti-villian. An anti-hero is someone who does that "good" thing for a villinous reason, however is ultimately seen as a hero. An anti-villian is someone that does the "bad" for what is a heroic goal, but is still seen as the villian.
Dude im not here to fight about it as it basically has nothing to do with the book, but just look up anti-hero vs anti-villian on google you should get a response saying, "Ultimately, the anti-hero does the right thing, but not necessarily for the right reasons. Whereas the anti-villain does the wrong thing, but their reasons are often understandable" (got this straight from google)
Prognastat:Oh if that’s what you’re saying thenbyou are just wrong.
I agree with that interpretation of the anti-hero. However an anti-villain should be a mirror to the anti-hero. So where an anti-hero despite not seeming like a hero has noble goals deep downs. So to mirror one that seems heroic on the surface, but has villainous goals is an anti-villain. Whatever your source for the term is I’ll just disagree with that reasoning for the term.
Classified:Dude im not here to fight about it as it basically has nothing to do with the book, but just look up anti-hero vs anti-villian on google you should get a response saying, "Ultimately, the anti-hero does the right thing, but not necessarily for the right reasons. Whereas the anti-villain does the wrong thing, but their reasons are often understandable" (got this straight from google)