Review Detail of Pythia in Phoenix In DXD
Review detail
The love interest is actually her r*pist, who abused her and locked her away for 7 months... Makes sense right? Not. It's not a harem but apparently it's one of those disturbing polyamorous relationships, where they all cheat on each other but it's okay because we call ourselves polyamorous. I'd much rather her and the r*pist stay loyal to each other and you continue writing the narrative instead of the constant s*x. Just my opinion though, I expected a DxD story with a Yuri setting and was provided with... This. You have to be some sick and twisted person to think that was a 'soul mate' or 'love'
Phoenix In DXD
Chaotic_Phoenix
Liked by 19 people
LIKEReplies25
they don't really cheat on one another since they are all in one relationship and it still took Luna a few hundred years for her to forgive her. Tatyana only raped her because she lost control of her emotions due to the influence of their soul energies and did whatever she could to make it up to her. The sex scenes are only because they had nothing to do due to being in the divine realm and not having a job but now that she has been reborn they wont be that often. Sorry if it's not to your liking though, hope you find a better book with a more experienced author.
Her 'harem members wont be sleeping with others, They will be sleeping with Luna and Luna's wife's. so like threesomes and such. They will not be sleeping with people outside of Luna's harem.
Pythia:I'm gonna clarify because i can see how it can be confusing. It's not a harem because they all love and are intimate with each other. So for example, her 'harem' members will go and sleep with other people including and excluding Luna's wife and other lovers... So yeah, cheating with extra steps.
So harem member 3 will sleep with her wife when she’s not there kinda thing? Urgh what a way to ruin a story.
Chaotic_Phoenix:Her 'harem members wont be sleeping with others, They will be sleeping with Luna and Luna's wife's. so like threesomes and such. They will not be sleeping with people outside of Luna's harem.
Then Ill change it to just harem. So they all belong to Luna. They will have 3 somes and such but only with Luna present.
SwanDive:So harem member 3 will sleep with her wife when she’s not there kinda thing? Urgh what a way to ruin a story.
Don’t change it just for me. But you will likely get a lot of people with mine and this guys preference on Webnovel. I also suggest following him. He’s hilarious when reading his feed can’t lie.
Chaotic_Phoenix:Then Ill change it to just harem. So they all belong to Luna. They will have 3 somes and such but only with Luna present.
SwanDive:Don’t change it just for me. But you will likely get a lot of people with mine and this guys preference on Webnovel. I also suggest following him. He’s hilarious when reading his feed can’t lie.
Just search up the definition of a traditional harem. Polyamory is they all love each other. Harem is one person, multiple partners. Also known as polygamy . "noun, the separate part of a Muslim household reserved for wives, concubines, and female servants." That's the official Oxford definition of a harem. "adjective, 1st person. Characterised by or involved in the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically s*xual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved." See, theres a very clear defining difference. I don't understand why you are trying to say i'm wrong when the definition is less than a 5 minute search away... And before you say anything. Notice it says first person definition, meaning, all members of the relation love and are intimate. Whereas, harems do not function under the same dynamic. Comprende señor?
Nervo:“polymorous relationship” is an umbrella term, wich by its defition includes haremsimage
We are not using the traditional definiton of harem here. So i dont get why you are trying to bring it up when its not being used in that context. And the defition you are using is ”polyamorous” wich is used to describe people. The word your meant to use to describe that type of relationship is “polyamory” wich is a noun. Comprende señor?
Pythia:Just search up the definition of a traditional harem. Polyamory is they all love each other. Harem is one person, multiple partners. Also known as polygamy . "noun, the separate part of a Muslim household reserved for wives, concubines, and female servants." That's the official Oxford definition of a harem. "adjective, 1st person. Characterised by or involved in the practice of engaging in multiple romantic (and typically s*xual) relationships, with the consent of all the people involved." See, theres a very clear defining difference. I don't understand why you are trying to say i'm wrong when the definition is less than a 5 minute search away... And before you say anything. Notice it says first person definition, meaning, all members of the relation love and are intimate. Whereas, harems do not function under the same dynamic. Comprende señor?
You know what. You're just one of those people that even when shown facts needs to be correct. So whatever, have a good life. If the Oxford dictionary definition is 'wrong' to you then can i start calling you all the insults under the sun? It's fine though, my definition is different than yours ;)
Nervo:We are not using the traditional definiton of harem here. So i dont get why you are trying to bring it up when its not being used in that context. And the defition you are using is ”polyamorous” wich is used to describe people. The word your meant to use to describe that type of relationship is “polyamory” wich is a noun. Comprende señor?
Wait a minute you just tried correcting the terminology again and still failed... How in all that's holy is that possible. I literally copy and pasted them from a dictionary thats universally used for the English language. That is not a noun when what's laid out before you in the subjective definition of the term used in a descriptive or characterising sense. "They are in a polyamorous relationship." And "He is polygamous." How can you not see the difference?
Nervo:We are not using the traditional definiton of harem here. So i dont get why you are trying to bring it up when its not being used in that context. And the defition you are using is ”polyamorous” wich is used to describe people. The word your meant to use to describe that type of relationship is “polyamory” wich is a noun. Comprende señor?
They are different terms for different things. Harem is not a polyamorous relation. Very simple. Yes? I seriously don't understand how this is hard for you to understand. Just search it up and shush.
Pythia:Wait a minute you just tried correcting the terminology again and still failed... How in all that's holy is that possible. I literally copy and pasted them from a dictionary thats universally used for the English language. That is not a noun when what's laid out before you in the subjective definition of the term used in a descriptive or characterising sense. "They are in a polyamorous relationship." And "He is polygamous." How can you not see the difference?
Nervo:We are not using the traditional definiton of harem here. So i dont get why you are trying to bring it up when its not being used in that context. And the defition you are using is ”polyamorous” wich is used to describe people. The word your meant to use to describe that type of relationship is “polyamory” wich is a noun. Comprende señor?
??? Polyamory is noun, again you used the definition of the word “polyamorous” to say that people in that everyone in those relationship all love and are intimate wich each other wich is just wrong. For example a type of polyamory is when a person is romantically involved the other two partners, but they are not sexually and romantically involved with one another.
Pythia:Wait a minute you just tried correcting the terminology again and still failed... How in all that's holy is that possible. I literally copy and pasted them from a dictionary thats universally used for the English language. That is not a noun when what's laid out before you in the subjective definition of the term used in a descriptive or characterising sense. "They are in a polyamorous relationship." And "He is polygamous." How can you not see the difference?
I used the singular when making the point that they are not the same. The definitions are of subjective context to the scenario present. Either way, it still has no relevance to the discussion. Harem is not polyamorous. OR as you wish to say it. A harem member is not a subject of polyamory. The 'centre' would be because, as you said, it's an umbrella term for someone with more than one intimate partners... God this is not hard to understand. Should i draw a diagram for you so you can understand the difference between the concepts?
Nervo:??? Polyamory is noun, again you used the definition of the word “polyamorous” to say that people in that everyone in those relationship all love and are intimate wich each other wich is just wrong. For example a type of polyamory is when a person is romantically involved the other two partners, but they are not sexually and romantically involved with one another.
Pythia:I used the singular when making the point that they are not the same. The definitions are of subjective context to the scenario present. Either way, it still has no relevance to the discussion. Harem is not polyamorous. OR as you wish to say it. A harem member is not a subject of polyamory. The 'centre' would be because, as you said, it's an umbrella term for someone with more than one intimate partners... God this is not hard to understand. Should i draw a diagram for you so you can understand the difference between the concepts?