Latest Author's Announcement Contains Spoilers. Read at your discretion. A lot of readers, especially during the first few chapters in the first volume have all valid criticism about plot holes and characters that are doing or acting in ways that are not in ‘character’ for good example: a korpsman that is not silent and too suicidal. But the thing is that Masha’s character has been explained why she acts and thinks in such an unorthodox way compared to her peers, and it is because in her flashback that happened very far down into the story that she had an encounter with an Inquisitor and was inducted to the Inquisition’s party - although temporarily - the readers can then assume and fill in the gaps that she learned or was taught stuff during her time with the Inquisitor. Following such an event possibly happening, it is only reasonable to think that Masha has learned things or been taught things only to a certain degree and does not know all of it, and basically just the gist of it. So any mistakes that she carelessly and recklessly did such as speak of the names of the Chaos Gods, you can say it was a poor decision on her part. I like to tell my story without dropping their backstory in just a single chapter, I drop it like crumbs and use it to angle their character to the current. I mean, they had lives before the story began so it is logical to think that something at least surprising or out of place happened in their life.
Liked it!
LIKE
No replies. Be the first!
